PANGERAN BANDAR BAKAL DIPECAT ATAS PERINTAH AMERIKA
http://cahyono-adi.blogspot.com/2013/10/pangeran-bandar-bakal-dipecat-atas.html#more
(TERLIBAT SERANGAN SENJATA KIMIA DI SYRIA)
Keterangan gambar: Pangeran Bandar (kiri) berbincang dengan menlu AS Condoleeza Rice sementara Raja Saudi berpelukan dengan Presiden Bush.
Kegagalan proyek Syria kembali bakal menelan korban. Setelah Emir Qatar
dan Presiden Mesir (Mohammad Moersi) yang terjungkal dari kekuasaan
karena peran Amerika, kini giliran kepala inteligen Saudi, Pangeran
Bandar bin Sultan, yang bakal menjadi korbannya. Tersudutkan oleh isu
senjata kimia Syria yang bukti-buktinya semakin mengarah pada peran
Amerika dan sekutu-sekutunya, membuat Amerika memutuskan untuk "cuci
tangan" dengan melengserkan Bandar dari jabatan strategisnya. Demikian
laporan yang beredar di kalangan awak media yang konsern dengan masalah
Timur Tengah, baru-baru ini.
Menurut laporan-laporan itu keputusan pemecatan Bandar "Bush" (ia diberi julukan nama "Bush" karena kedekatannya dengan keluarga George W. Bush) akan dikeluarkan raja Abdullah bin Abdulaziz akhir November mendatang. Sama seperti "rumor" tentang pelengseran Emir Qatar oleh Amerika yang terbukti benar, rumor kali inipun dianggap sangat valid.
Pada tgl 29 Agustus sebuah laporan dari Mint Press News menyebutkan keterangan para saksi mata di Ghouta, Damaskus, tentang keterlibatan Saudi Arabia dalam menyediakan senjata-senjata kimia yang digunakan para mujahilin Syria. Laporan yang sebagiannya melibatkan koresponsen kantor berita Amerika Associated Press di Timur Tengah Dale Gavlak itu mencakup wawancara dengan para dokter yang menangani korban serangan kimia, penduduk, mujahilin serta keluarga korban itu dengan jelas merujuk pada keterlibatan Bandar Bush.
Setelah munculnya laporan itu Dale Gavlak pun menerima ancaman pembunuhan dari kelompok-kelompok mujahilin yang diketahui sebagai "operator"-nya Bandar.
Segera setelah terjadinya insiden serangan senjata kimia di Ghouta Damaskus, 21 Agustus lalu yang dituduhkan dilakukan oleh pasukan pemerintah Syria, Amerika dan negara-negara barat pun meningkatkan retorika perangnya dengan mengancam menyerang Syria. Namun ancaman tersebut digagalkan oleh sikap tegas sekutu-sekutu Syria terutama Rusia, Iran dan Hizbollah yang bertekad membantu Syria mati-matian dari serangan barat.
Hingga saat ini kepastian tentang siapa pelaku serangan senjata kimia tersebut masih simpang siur. PBB sendiri dalam laporan penyelidikannya tentang insiden tersebut tidak menunjukkan dengan pasti siapa pelaku serangan. Namun Rusia dan Iran, para analis independen dan termasuk para blog dan situs-situs independenden ramai-ramai menuduh pemberontak Syria sebagai pelaku serangan dengan motif untuk memprovokasi intervensi Amerika.
Tahun lalu muncul rumor tentang tewasnya Bandar bin Sultan oleh serangan bom di kantor dinas inteligen Saudi yang menewaskan juga wakil kepala dinas inteligen Saudi. Bandar pun tiba-tiba menghilang selama berbulan-bulan dari peredaran setelah serangan itu. Diduga kuat ia mengalami cedera serius meski nasibnya masih lebih baik daripada wakilnya. Awal Agustus lalu atau beberapa hari sebelum terjadinya serangan senjata kimia, Bandar juga dikabarkan telah berusaha membujuk Rusia untuk menghentikan dukungannya kepada pemerintah Syria, namun ditolak Presiden Rusia Vladimir Putin.
Menurut laporan-laporan itu keputusan pemecatan Bandar "Bush" (ia diberi julukan nama "Bush" karena kedekatannya dengan keluarga George W. Bush) akan dikeluarkan raja Abdullah bin Abdulaziz akhir November mendatang. Sama seperti "rumor" tentang pelengseran Emir Qatar oleh Amerika yang terbukti benar, rumor kali inipun dianggap sangat valid.
Pada tgl 29 Agustus sebuah laporan dari Mint Press News menyebutkan keterangan para saksi mata di Ghouta, Damaskus, tentang keterlibatan Saudi Arabia dalam menyediakan senjata-senjata kimia yang digunakan para mujahilin Syria. Laporan yang sebagiannya melibatkan koresponsen kantor berita Amerika Associated Press di Timur Tengah Dale Gavlak itu mencakup wawancara dengan para dokter yang menangani korban serangan kimia, penduduk, mujahilin serta keluarga korban itu dengan jelas merujuk pada keterlibatan Bandar Bush.
Setelah munculnya laporan itu Dale Gavlak pun menerima ancaman pembunuhan dari kelompok-kelompok mujahilin yang diketahui sebagai "operator"-nya Bandar.
Segera setelah terjadinya insiden serangan senjata kimia di Ghouta Damaskus, 21 Agustus lalu yang dituduhkan dilakukan oleh pasukan pemerintah Syria, Amerika dan negara-negara barat pun meningkatkan retorika perangnya dengan mengancam menyerang Syria. Namun ancaman tersebut digagalkan oleh sikap tegas sekutu-sekutu Syria terutama Rusia, Iran dan Hizbollah yang bertekad membantu Syria mati-matian dari serangan barat.
Hingga saat ini kepastian tentang siapa pelaku serangan senjata kimia tersebut masih simpang siur. PBB sendiri dalam laporan penyelidikannya tentang insiden tersebut tidak menunjukkan dengan pasti siapa pelaku serangan. Namun Rusia dan Iran, para analis independen dan termasuk para blog dan situs-situs independenden ramai-ramai menuduh pemberontak Syria sebagai pelaku serangan dengan motif untuk memprovokasi intervensi Amerika.
Tahun lalu muncul rumor tentang tewasnya Bandar bin Sultan oleh serangan bom di kantor dinas inteligen Saudi yang menewaskan juga wakil kepala dinas inteligen Saudi. Bandar pun tiba-tiba menghilang selama berbulan-bulan dari peredaran setelah serangan itu. Diduga kuat ia mengalami cedera serius meski nasibnya masih lebih baik daripada wakilnya. Awal Agustus lalu atau beberapa hari sebelum terjadinya serangan senjata kimia, Bandar juga dikabarkan telah berusaha membujuk Rusia untuk menghentikan dukungannya kepada pemerintah Syria, namun ditolak Presiden Rusia Vladimir Putin.
REF:
"US may ask Saudi to fire Bandar over Syria: Report"; Press TV; 9 Oktober 2013
3 komentar:
-
abu bakar mengatakan...
- Komentar ini telah dihapus oleh penulis.
-
abu bakar mengatakan...
-
terlalu awal untuk mengatakan demikian,sang putera jihadis yang memimpin
perjuangan menewaskan russia di afghan sedang memimpin kumpulan yang
terpecah di suriah, sepatutnya mereka membuat amukan oktober serentak
dengan serangan nato-us yang hampir terjadi tetapi di gagalkan oleh kgb
putin lavrov,
peperangan lama sedang kembali,aktor-aktor lama masih ada-namun dia tidak akan dibiarkan,kita akan melihat bagaimana beruang-beruang akan bertindak setelah kejayaan diplomasi lavrov
bandar lebih tangguh dari sangkaan sesiapa..dia seolah ditakdirkan hidup lama...dia amru al ash zaman ini -
cahyono adi mengatakan...
- Sy setuju tentang Amr bin Ash. O ya, ia khan putra dari seorang budak, sama seperti Amr bin Ash sang "manusia yang terputus". Dan sama seperti Amr, ia akan mati dalam keadaan nista. Insya Allah.
'S Arabia signs deal with Israeli army to buy weapons for militants fighting Syria govt.'http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/27/315771/s-arabia-israel-army-sign-arms-deal/
Israeli soldiers sit atop a tank as they watch the Syrian border in the Golan Heights July 3, 2013.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:30AM GMTThe Syrian government says the West and its regional allies - especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey - are supporting the militants."Saudi Arabia reportedly reaches a deal with Israeli army to buy Israeli weapons for militants fighting against the government of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
Israeli Radio reported that Saudi Arabia signed a 50-million-dollar deal with Israeli army to supply the foreign-backed militants with old Israeli military equipment and arms.
The reports added that the weapons include different kinds of anti-tank missiles, military vehicles, artillery equipment, and night vision devices.
Other sources have quoted Takfiri sources as saying that the Israeli weapons will be used to maintain control over Aleppo and its surrounding areas in northern Syria.
The report came as The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported last month that Saudi Arabia has provided the Takfiri militants with Russian-made Konkurs anti-tank missiles.
It quoted militant sources as saying that they had received the first batch of the heavy weaponry from Saudi Arabia in northern city of Aleppo.
On June 14, US President Barack Obama ordered his administration to provide the militants with weapons, claiming that the Syrian government had used “chemical weapons” against the militants and thus crossed Washington’s “red line.” Damascus has rejected the allegation as “lies.”
Israeli President Shimon Peres voiced support for Washington’s arming of the Takfiri militants in Syria. Takfiris accuse most Islamic sects of being infidels.
However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned other states against providing weapons to the militants in Syria, saying that the arms could end up in Europe one day.
The Syrian government says the West and its regional allies - especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey - are supporting the militants.
Syria has been gripped by deadly unrest since 2011. According to the United Nations, more than 100,000 people have been killed and millions of others displaced in the violence.
DB/HNThe Syrian government says the West and its regional allies - especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey - are supporting the militants."Dogs of war seek instability in Syria: AnalystSun Jul 14, 2013 6:38AM GMTInterview with Sara Floundershttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/14/313714/dogs-of-war-seek-unstable-syria/They have no leadership, even. The leadership outside the country of a hodgepodge of exiles themselves cannot meet or agree. The forces on the ground, they’re killing each other, and robbing equipment from each other, and setting up bank accounts in other countries outside. You really see an assortment of some of the ugliest dogs of war, as they’re called, who have no interest in a new Syria.”Press TV has conducted an interview with Sara Flounders, with International Action Center, from New York, to discuss the situation in Syria.
The following is an approximate transcript of the interview.
Press TV: What is going on now between these groups of fighters, the ones who are fighting the Syrian government, as we see more and more of this infighting taking place and turning their guns on each other. Why are we seeing this at this time?
Flounders: This has from the very beginning been an assortment of thugs, mercenaries, religious fanatic forces that are based on sectarian hatred, armed and financed outside of Syria, whether from US and NATO countries - we could look at Saudi Arabia, Jordan, bases in Turkey.
All of this is an international effort to pull down Syria and do so with a whole collection of mercenaries who have no program. They don’t even have a unified command. Now they are fighting each other for resources. They have no ability to provide for the population and have no interest in providing the simplest things like bread or medicine.
They are up against a cohesive Syrian army that has shown the ability to survive and sustain itself and change, adapt its tactics and measures to meet this outside army.
The most important thing about this army, this military force is that now they are fighting each other because they lack any cohesion even of purpose. So, they’re fighting each other over resources, over booty, over equipment. They’re really connected as death-squad groups, used to only military means, unable to even come together in any political form.
You can see why the US, Israel and also the monarchies of the region would want to destroy Syria and pull it down without any plan on what would come next.
But now, the very forces that are all in different patchwork arming are at each other’s throats. That’s what happens when you have a collection who has no program.
Press TV: A very interesting analysis by Mr. Mouracadeh, of groups that have been supported all by the United States. Now he’s basically saying that perhaps it’s something that the Syrian government is involved in. Your take on his comments, ma’am.
Flounders: Well, I couldn’t disagree more. His whole commentary is based on an absolute illusion.
This is not a revolutionary upheaval. From the very beginning, this is a whole collection of forces who lack any legitimacy whatsoever. It’s an artificial construct. It’s groups pumped into the country from outside, mercenaries who are paid, and sectarian religious forces that have no interest in the people of Syria, who have existed in unity and in great cohesion for generations. They want to break all that up.
Why is the US, why is NATO, why is Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, all these countries that have no interest in democracy funding these groups? They thought it would be easy. They predicted this would be over in a month. That was two years ago, more than two years ago - actually, almost two-and-a-half years ago now.
With every month they predicted that the end was near, that they would succeed, that they would prevail, all without any program whatsoever.
They have no leadership, even. The leadership outside the country of a hodgepodge of exiles themselves cannot meet or agree. The forces on the ground, they’re killing each other, and robbing equipment from each other, and setting up bank accounts in other countries outside. You really see an assortment of some of the ugliest dogs of war, as they’re called, who have no interest in a new Syria.
It’s become clear to the population now that these forces have nothing to offer them except executions on the spot, without any legitimacy, without any legality, without any appeal.
The other speaker, I think, is existing on the page of US press releases but certainly not in the realm of reality.
Press TV: Basically what our guest in Beirut is saying is that this group knows more about democracy than anybody else. Your take, overall, on his comments.
Flounders: Well, first of all it’s up to the Syrian people to decide how to deal with all of the questions internally in Syria.
The real problem and the war itself - all war is an atrocity. All the forms and tactics used in war are an atrocity. The outside forces were funded from the US Special Forces based in Jordan, NATO bases in Turkey, arms flooding in from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. That’s the outside intervention, not the Syrian people having discussion and debate.
Yes, there is opposition as there is in every country but that is not the armed forces of thugs and mercenaries who were paid also from outside. That is not a legitimate opposition. This is an artificial construct.
There were Syrian people who have not completely separated themselves from these mercenaries and executors. The reason that they have is because it’s become clear to them that these mercenaries have nothing to offer, are not part of the Syrian debate whatsoever, and instead want to destroyed everything Syria is based on and create sectarian hatred.
Are there any differences in Syria? Of course there is in every single country and it’s up to the Syrian people to have a right to decide that without outside intervention, without an invasion of forces, without Israeli bombardment, without US Special Forces in Jordan, without arms flooding in from Saudi Arabia, without mercenaries on the ground, without backside bases in Turkey. That is what exists today in Syria.
Nevertheless, those forces are losing. They’re completely losing. They’re in disarray. They’re killing each other and they’re looting from each other. That in every sense shows they have nothing progressive to offer. They will lose and they are losing.
Press TV: [In reply to Mr. Mouracadeh’s comments,] Ms. Flounders.
Flounders: The other speaker seems to have absolutely no interest in democracy when he wants to ally himself with absolute, feudal, corrupt monarchies in Saudi Arabia, and in Qatar who don’t have any elections what-so-ever there. You think the Special Forces in the Jordanian monarchy are democratic forces?
It’s up to the Syrian people without outside intervention, which is exactly what he is supporting: the outside, mercenary forces who have flooded into the country, who have set off bombs in every crowded market place, in schools, destroyed hospitals. These are the forces he’s aligned with.
Press TV: Ms. Flounders, I want to pick up on a point you just mentioned. You talked about the other entities that are involved. I want to look at Saudi Arabia’s role in this because many experts are now saying that what we’re looking at as far as this in-fighting is actually something being encouraged by Saudi Arabia as it is trying to purge these groups of the Muslim Brotherhood because actually there is a power struggle between these countries who have allied these insurgents - we know that it’s involving Saudi Arabia, it’s involving Qatar and it’s involving Turkey besides the Western countries, your take ma’am.
Flounders: Yes, a lot is being fought out within Syria that are proxy wars in terms of Saudi Arabia supporting some of the most fanatical forces. Then you also have Qatar and Turkey supporting Muslim Brotherhood forces, who are fighting with each other against the Free Syrian Army. Then you have lots of just mercenary forces, who come in wherever there is war who will fight for pay - forces shipped in from Libya, from all over the region. They’re being recruited to fight in Syria without any program, without any understanding of what they’re doing.
So, you have countries fighting each other, you have US Special Forces in there and you have, at the very same time, Israel bombing both weapons centers, military centers. How about that?
Is this other speaker who’s on today, where does he stand about the Israeli bombardment, about the US intervention, about the Special Forces when he’s talking about a democratic opposition in Syria? People of Syria have a right and an ability to decide this themselves.
GMA/HSN- US may ask Saudi to fire Bandar over Syria: Reporthttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/10/09/328375/saudi-may-fire-bandar-over-syria-report/
Saudi spy chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al SaudWed Oct 9, 2013 12:42AM GMT
731Saudi Arabia may sack spy chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud at the request of Washington for entangling the United States in the Syrian crisis, a report says.
The decision to remove the chief of the Saudi intelligence services could come in an unexpected royal decree by Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud by the end of November, the report quoted unnamed political sources in the kingdom.
The House of Saud despises the spymaster and has been skeptical of his policies on many occasions.
On August 29, a Mint Press News report quoted Syrians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta as saying that Saudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for an al-Qaeda linked terrorist group, which they blame for an August chemical attack in the region.
The report, co-authored by Associated Press correspondent in the Middle East Dale Gavlak, said interviews with doctors, residents, anti-government forces and their families in Ghouta suggest the terrorists in question received chemical weapons via the Saudi spy chief.
Gavlak received threats 48 hours after revealing the story. She said that the “threats came from a third party who was most likely acting on behalf of” Bandar.
Following the August 21 chemical attack, US stepped up its war rhetoric against the Syrian government and called for punitive military action against Damascus, after the militants operating inside Syria and the foreign-backed Syrian opposition accused the army of being behind the attack.
Damascus, however, has strongly denied the accusation, saying the attack was a false-flag operation carried out by Takfiri groups in a bid to draw in foreign military intervention.
Syria has been gripped by deadly unrest since 2011. According to reports, the Western powers and their regional allies -- especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey -- are supporting the militants operating inside Syria.
According to the United Nations, more than 100,000 people have been killed and millions of others displaced in the violence.
PG/MHB/MAMUS general in charge of nuclear missiles firedFri Oct 11, 2013 5:59PM GMTEmbed ..http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/10/11/328880/us-general-fired-nuclear-missiles/..A two-star US general in charge of the Air Force's nuclear intercontinental missiles was fired on Friday due to personal misbehavior, the second firing this week of a senior commander of nuclear forces.
Maj. Gen. Michael Carey was removed from command of the 20th Air Force, which is responsible for maintaining a total of 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) at three bases across the US, according to an Air Force spokesman, Brig. Gen. Les Kodlick, AP reports.
Lt. Gen. James Kowalski, commander of Air Force Global Strike Command made the decision to fire Carey.
The exact reason for the removal of Maj. Gen. Carey was not immediately clear, but a Pentagon official who spoke on condition of anonymity, said it was due to "a loss of trust and confidence.”
The 20th Air Force is a unit of Air Force Global Strike Command, which is in charge of all Air Force nuclear weapons, including bombers.
It is one of two Air Force component commands reporting to US Strategic Command, which oversees everything from America's land-based nuclear missiles to space operations and military intelligence.
On Wednesday, another high-ranking US military commander responsible for the country’s nuclear arsenal was fired for illegal gambling activities.
Navy Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, the deputy commander of US Strategic Command, was already suspended from his post on September 3 and notified on Wednesday that he was formally relieved.
The suspension of the three-star general was highly unusual and unprecedented in the history of the US Strategic Command.
AHT/HJ
Perlahan tapi pasti, semua Wahabis Boneka Israel dan Amerika akan terjungkal dari Tanah Haram sesuai dengan janji Nabi SAWW. Kebrutalan mereka dengan mengorbankan nyawa sesama Muslim tak mungkin bisa diampuni. Untunglah di Mesir mereka GAGAL TOTAL. Alhamdulillah... Mereka coba mengusik SURIAH dan mereka kena batunya.
BalasHapus