Surat Terbuka Moore kepada Obama
Michael Moore dulu (saat kampanye pemilu) mendukung Obama. Kini dia
masuk ke barisan sakit hati karena ternyata Obama meneruskan kebijakan
perang. Diapun menulis surat terbuka pada Obama. Surat ini ditulis
ketika Obama berencana mengambil keputusan penambahan pasukan ke
Afghanistan. Surat Moore sia-sia, Obama tak peduli suratnya dan tetap
menambah 30.000 pasukan ke Afghan.
Tapi surat ini tetap menarik utk dibaca.
Salah satu poin menarik: pertanyaan ‘buat apa menambah pasukan ke
Afghan padahal intelijen menyebutkan sesungguhnya jumlah Taliban hanya
kurang dari 100 orang saja.?’
Maaf sedang ga punya waktu utk menerjemahkannya:)
http://dinasulaeman.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/surat-terbuka-moore-kepada-obama/
——————–
Dear President Obama,
Do you really want to be the new “war president”? If you go to West
Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are
increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are
the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the
worst possible thing you could do — destroy the hopes and dreams so many
millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you
will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your
campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they’ve
always heard is true — that all politicians are alike. I simply can’t
believe you’re about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say
it isn’t so.
It is not your job to do what the generals tell you to do. We are a
civilian-run government. WE tell the Joint Chiefs what to do, not the
other way around. That’s the way General Washington insisted it must be.
That’s what President Truman told General MacArthur when MacArthur
wanted to invade China. “You’re fired!,” said Truman, and that was that.
And you should have fired Gen. McChrystal when he went to the press to
preempt you, telling the press what YOU had to do. Let me be blunt: We
love our kids in the armed services, but we f*#&in’ hate these
generals, from Westmoreland in Vietnam to, yes, even Colin Powell for
lying to the UN with his made-up drawings of WMD (he has since sought
redemption).
So now you feel backed into a corner. 30 years ago this past Thursday
(Thanksgiving) the Soviet generals had a cool idea — “Let’s invade
Afghanistan!” Well, that turned out to be the final nail in the USSR
coffin.
There’s a reason they don’t call Afghanistan the “Garden State”
(though they probably should, seeing how the corrupt President Karzai,
whom we back, has
Surat Terbuka Moore kepada Obama
Michael Moore dulu (saat kampanye pemilu) mendukung Obama. Kini dia
masuk ke barisan sakit hati karena ternyata Obama meneruskan kebijakan
perang. Diapun menulis surat terbuka pada Obama. Surat ini ditulis
ketika Obama berencana mengambil keputusan penambahan pasukan ke
Afghanistan. Surat Moore sia-sia, Obama tak peduli suratnya dan tetap
menambah 30.000 pasukan ke Afghan.
Tapi surat ini tetap menarik utk dibaca.
Salah satu poin menarik: pertanyaan ‘buat apa menambah pasukan ke
Afghan padahal intelijen menyebutkan sesungguhnya jumlah Taliban hanya
kurang dari 100 orang saja.?’
Maaf sedang ga punya waktu utk menerjemahkannya:)
——————–Dear President Obama,
Do you really want to be the new “war president”? If you go to West
Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are
increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are
the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the
worst possible thing you could do — destroy the hopes and dreams so many
millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you
will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your
campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they’ve
always heard is true — that all politicians are alike. I simply can’t
believe you’re about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say
it isn’t so.
It is not your job to do what the generals tell you to do. We are a
civilian-run government. WE tell the Joint Chiefs what to do, not the
other way around. That’s the way General Washington insisted it must be.
That’s what President Truman told General MacArthur when MacArthur
wanted to invade China. “You’re fired!,” said Truman, and that was that.
And you should have fired Gen. McChrystal when he went to the press to
preempt you, telling the press what YOU had to do. Let me be blunt: We
love our kids in the armed services, but we f*#&in’ hate these
generals, from Westmoreland in Vietnam to, yes, even Colin Powell for
lying to the UN with his made-up drawings of WMD (he has since sought
redemption).
So now you feel backed into a corner. 30 years ago this past Thursday
(Thanksgiving) the Soviet generals had a cool idea — “Let’s invade
Afghanistan!” Well, that turned out to be the final nail in the USSR
coffin.
There’s a reason they don’t call Afghanistan the “Garden State”
(though they probably should, seeing how the corrupt President Karzai,
whom we back, has his brother in the heroin trade
raising poppies). Afghanistan’s nickname is the “Graveyard of Empires.”
If you don’t believe it, give the British a call. I’d have you call
Genghis Khan but I lost his number. I do have Gorbachev’s number though.
It’s + 41 22 789 1662. I’m sure he could give you an earful about the historic blunder you’re about to commit.
With our economic collapse still in full swing and our precious young
men and women being sacrificed on the altar of arrogance and greed, the
breakdown of this great civilization we call America will head, full
throttle, into oblivion if you become the “war president.” Empires never
think the end is near, until the end is here. Empires think that more
evil will force the heathens to toe the line — and yet it never works.
The heathens usually tear them to shreds.
Choose carefully, President Obama. You of all people know that it
doesn’t have to be this way. You still have a few hours to listen to
your heart, and your own clear thinking. You know that nothing good can
come from sending more troops halfway around the world to a place
neither you nor they understand, to achieve an objective that neither
you nor they understand, in a country that does not want us there. You
can feel it in your bones.
I know you know that there are LESS than a hundred al-Qaeda left in
Afghanistan! A hundred thousand troops trying to crush a hundred guys
living in caves? Are you serious? Have you drunk Bush’s Kool-Aid? I
refuse to believe it.
Your potential decision to expand the war (while saying that you’re
doing it so you can “end the war”) will do more to set your legacy in
stone than any of the great things you’ve said and done in your first
year. One more throwing a bone from you to the Republicans and the
coalition of the hopeful and the hopeless may be gone — and this nation
will be back in the hands of the haters quicker than you can shout “tea
bag!”
Choose carefully, Mr. President. Your corporate backers are going to
abandon you as soon as it is clear you are a one-term president and that
the nation will be safely back in the hands of the usual idiots who do
their bidding. That could be Wednesday morning.
We the people still love you. We the people still have a sliver of
hope. But we the people can’t take it anymore. We can’t take your caving
in, over and over, when we elected you by a big, wide margin of
millions to get in there and get the job done. What part of “landslide
victory” don’t you understand?
Don’t be deceived into thinking that sending a few more troops into
Afghanistan will make a difference, or earn you the respect of the
haters. They will not stop until this country is torn asunder and every
last dollar is extracted from the poor and soon-to-be poor. You could
send a million troops over there and the crazy Right still wouldn’t be
happy. You would still be the victim of their incessant venom on hate
radio and television because no matter what you do, you can’t change the
one thing about yourself that sends them over the edge.
The haters were not the ones who elected you, and they can’t be won over by abandoning the rest of us.
President Obama, it’s time to come home. Ask your neighbors in
Chicago and the parents of the young men and women doing the fighting
and dying if they want more billions and more troops sent to
Afghanistan. Do you think they will say, “No, we don’t need health care,
we don’t need jobs, we don’t need homes. You go on ahead, Mr.
President, and send our wealth and our sons and daughters overseas,
’cause we don’t need them, either.”
What would Martin Luther King, Jr. do? What would your grandmother
do? Not send more poor people to kill other poor people who pose no
threat to them, that’s what they’d do. Not spend billions and trillions
to wage war while American children are sleeping on the streets and
standing in bread lines.
All of us that voted and prayed for you and cried the night of your
victory have endured an Orwellian hell of eight years of crimes
committed in our name: torture, rendition, suspension of the bill of
rights, invading nations who had not attacked us, blowing up
neighborhoods that Saddam “might” be in (but never was), slaughtering
wedding parties in Afghanistan. We watched as hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi civilians were slaughtered and tens of thousands of our brave
young men and women were killed, maimed, or endured mental anguish — the
full terror of which we scarcely know.
When we elected you we didn’t expect miracles. We didn’t even expect
much change. But we expected some. We thought you would stop the
madness. Stop the killing. Stop the insane idea that men with guns can
reorganize a nation that doesn’t even function as a nation and never,
ever has.
Stop, stop, stop! For the sake of the lives of young Americans and
Afghan civilians, stop. For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the
future of our nation, stop. For God’s sake, stop.
Tonight we still have hope.
Tomorrow, we shall see. The ball is in your court. You DON’T have to
do this. You can be a profile in courage. You can be your mother’s son.
We’re counting on you.
Yours,Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com
Afghanistan’s nickname is the “Graveyard of Empires.”
If you don’t believe it, give the British a call. I’d have you call
Genghis Khan but I lost his number. I do have Gorbachev’s number though.
It’s + 41 22 789 1662. I’m sure he could give you an earful about the historic blunder you’re about to commit.
With our economic collapse still in full swing and our precious young
men and women being sacrificed on the altar of arrogance and greed, the
breakdown of this great civilization we call America will head, full
throttle, into oblivion if you become the “war president.” Empires never
think the end is near, until the end is here. Empires think that more
evil will force the heathens to toe the line — and yet it never works.
The heathens usually tear them to shreds.
Choose carefully, President Obama. You of all people know that it
doesn’t have to be this way. You still have a few hours to listen to
your heart, and your own clear thinking. You know that nothing good can
come from sending more troops halfway around the world to a place
neither you nor they understand, to achieve an objective that neither
you nor they understand, in a country that does not want us there. You
can feel it in your bones.
I know you know that there are LESS than a hundred al-Qaeda left in
Afghanistan! A hundred thousand troops trying to crush a hundred guys
living in caves? Are you serious? Have you drunk Bush’s Kool-Aid? I
refuse to believe it.
Your potential decision to expand the war (while saying that you’re
doing it so you can “end the war”) will do more to set your legacy in
stone than any of the great things you’ve said and done in your first
year. One more throwing a bone from you to the Republicans and the
coalition of the hopeful and the hopeless may be gone — and this nation
will be back in the hands of the haters quicker than you can shout “tea
bag!”
Choose carefully, Mr. President. Your corporate backers are going to
abandon you as soon as it is clear you are a one-term president and that
the nation will be safely back in the hands of the usual idiots who do
their bidding. That could be Wednesday morning.
We the people still love you. We the people still have a sliver of
hope. But we the people can’t take it anymore. We can’t take your caving
in, over and over, when we elected you by a big, wide margin of
millions to get in there and get the job done. What part of “landslide
victory” don’t you understand?
Don’t be deceived into thinking that sending a few more troops into
Afghanistan will make a difference, or earn you the respect of the
haters. They will not stop until this country is torn asunder and every
last dollar is extracted from the poor and soon-to-be poor. You could
send a million troops over there and the crazy Right still wouldn’t be
happy. You would still be the victim of their incessant venom on hate
radio and television because no matter what you do, you can’t change the
one thing about yourself that sends them over the edge.
The haters were not the ones who elected you, and they can’t be won over by abandoning the rest of us.
President Obama, it’s time to come home. Ask your neighbors in
Chicago and the parents of the young men and women doing the fighting
and dying if they want more billions and more troops sent to
Afghanistan. Do you think they will say, “No, we don’t need health care,
we don’t need jobs, we don’t need homes. You go on ahead, Mr.
President, and send our wealth and our sons and daughters overseas,
’cause we don’t need them, either.”
What would Martin Luther King, Jr. do? What would your grandmother
do? Not send more poor people to kill other poor people who pose no
threat to them, that’s what they’d do. Not spend billions and trillions
to wage war while American children are sleeping on the streets and
standing in bread lines.
All of us that voted and prayed for you and cried the night of your
victory have endured an Orwellian hell of eight years of crimes
committed in our name: torture, rendition, suspension of the bill of
rights, invading nations who had not attacked us, blowing up
neighborhoods that Saddam “might” be in (but never was), slaughtering
wedding parties in Afghanistan. We watched as hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi civilians were slaughtered and tens of thousands of our brave
young men and women were killed, maimed, or endured mental anguish — the
full terror of which we scarcely know.
When we elected you we didn’t expect miracles. We didn’t even expect
much change. But we expected some. We thought you would stop the
madness. Stop the killing. Stop the insane idea that men with guns can
reorganize a nation that doesn’t even function as a nation and never,
ever has.
Stop, stop, stop! For the sake of the lives of young Americans and
Afghan civilians, stop. For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the
future of our nation, stop. For God’s sake, stop.
Tonight we still have hope.
Tomorrow, we shall see. The ball is in your court. You DON’T have to
do this. You can be a profile in courage. You can be your mother’s son.
We’re counting on you.
Yours,Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com
Afghanistan's Poppy Problem: Karzai's Brother Under Drug Suspicion
Afghanistan's President Hamid
Karzai is facing hard times. As his brother fights accusations that he's
involved in the country's rampant drug trade, an increasing number of
Afghans are disappointed by their government. Many are starting to think
about potential presidential successors.
REUTERS
An Afghan laborerdestroys poppies
http://www.spiegel.de/international/grossbild-434523-692722.html
ANZEIGE
DER SPIEGEL
Graphic: The Heroin Roads
Washington is still supporting Karzai, but the United States is having
its own problems in Afghanistan at the moment. The US high command has
called on soldiers to use more reserve in their dealings with Afghan
civilians. Aggressive driving and behavior, obscene gestures and
threatening people with weapons just serves to provide ammunition to the
enemy, stated an e-mail sent by an lower-ranking officer that was later
distributed by Peter Schoomaker, the Army's chief of staff. In May,
incidents that led to the deaths of civilians in Afhganistan triggered
spontaneous anti-American protests. Crowds at the protest also burned
images of their president in effigy and chanted: "Death to Karzai!"
dsl/spiegelPrahara Suriah, Perang Dunia Tiga yang Terselubung
http://hankam.kompasiana.com/2013/05/23/prahara-suriah-perang-dunia-3-yang-terselubung-562475.html#
Fenomena Arab spring
yang dimulai dari Tunisia kemudian menjalar ke Libya dan Mesir ternyata
terhenti dan berkecamuk di Suriah. Cara-cara yang digunakan seperti di
Libya atau Tunisia terbukti tak berhasil menundukan pemerintahan Bashar
Al Assad yang tengah berkuasa. Upaya menggulingkan kekuasaan Bashar Al
Assad awalnya dilakukan oleh pihak oposisi melalui demonstrasi dan
tuntutan reformasi politik namun sayangnya fakta dilapangan berbanding
terbalik. Pemerintaahan Assad masih didukung oleh sebagian besar rakyat,
tokoh2 agama dan kekuatan militer sehingga masih terlalu dini untuk
digulingkan .
Kegagalan Oposisi mengganti kekuasaan Suriah melalui jalan
damai akhirnya mendorong banyak pihak yang bersekutu dengan oposisi
untuk melancarkan pemberontakan bersenjata. Hanya dalam hitungan hari,
Pasukan Pemerintah dan Pemberontak terlibat perterungan sengit yang
berdarah-darah, suriah berkecamuk hebat, ribuan manusia meregang nyawa
dan jutaan lainnya terpaksa menjadi pengungsi.
Perang Suriah yang
awalnya dilakoni oleh 2 pihak saja yakni Pemerintah dan Oposisi
Pemberontak mulai merembet kemana-mana, pasukan pemberontak mulai
dijejali berbagai macam pasukan asing yang di deploy dari negara2
tetangga seperti jordania dan Turki. Pihak yang terlibat perang makin
carut marut, ambigiu bahkan banyak juga segerombolan teroris yang
memanfaatkan kerusuhan ini untuk ambil bagian dengan tujuan gak jelas.
Dilain pihak, Negara tetangga suriah seperti Lebanon dan Turki kena
cipatran perang suriah juga, 2 negara ini bersama jordania dituduh
sebagai jalur penyuplai senjata dan logistik bagi kelompok pemberontak.
Sekutu Suriah, Rusia yang memiliki banyak kepentingan strategis dengan
Suriah juga merasa terganggu akibat perang Suriah ini dan sampe sekarang
secara konsisten terus mendukung Bashar Al Assad. Sama
Seperti Rusia, Iran juga turut mendukung secara politis terhadap Bashar
Al Assad, China pun demikian meski tak terlalu terlihat seperti Rusia
dan Iran.
Di pihak pemberontak,
dukungan kuat mengalir dari Liga Arab, Dewan Kerjasama Negara Teluk
(Gulf Cooperation Council) ,Inggris, Perancis, Turki, dan tentu saja
Amerika serikat serta Israel. Banyak tangan asing yang turut bermain di
Suriah semakin memanaskan situasi, saling tuduh sudah menjadi menu
harian, PBB melalui Dewan Keamanan gagal meloloskan resolusi karena di
veto Rusia dan China, Bila PBB meloloskan resolusi ini maka bakal
menjadi alat legalitas bagi Amerika dan NATO untuk melakukan invasi
terbuka seperti kasus Libya. Solusi damai yang ditawarkan Bashar Al
Assad tern yata juga ditolak oleh pihak oposisi begitu juga sebaliknya
tuntutan Oposisi juga ditolak keras oleh Assad. Nah, mengamati dinamika
yang berkembang di Suriah, sepertinya tak ada salahnya klo Prahara di
Suriah bisa disebut sebagai Perang Dunia ke 3 yang terselubung. Banyak
Negara yang terlibat meski secara tak langsung atau bahasanya gaulnya
“Nabok Nyilih Tangan”.
Perang Dunia 3 di suriah ini terbagi dalam 2 poros, Yakni :
1. Aliansi Bumi (Earth Alliance) aka E.F.S.F
Pihak yang berada di
kubu ini antara lain Suriah, Rusia, Iran, Hizbullah, dan China. Rusia
yang memiliki pangkalang angkatan laut di tartus memindahkan sebagian
armada laut hitam dan pasifiknya ke pangkalan ini, tak tanggung2 kapal2
penghancur, pendarat dan kapal selam disiagakan di pangkalan ini guna
mencegah campur tangan langsung Negara lain. Rusia juga serius membantuk
menyokong persenjataan rusia, dari klas bawah sampai atas seperti
mengirim sistem pertahanan udara S300 , Rudal anti kapal Yakhont dan
Pantsyr S-1, menyebar radar canggih serta melatih pasukan suriah untuk
mengoperasikan alutsista canggih tersebut.
Kekuatan militer suriah yang
didukung persenjataan canggih membuat pihak Barat seperti NATO tak
berani melakukan serangan langsung, hanya Israel yang berani mengirim
jet tempurnya untuk menghancurkan tempat strategis di Suriah yang
langsung dikecam oleh banyak pihak. Iran kabarnya mengirimkan pasukan
khususnya untuk bertempur bersama pasukan pemerintah serta mengirimkan
pasokan senjata. Iran dan suriah sering bekerja sama menyalurkan senjata
bagi pasukan Hizbullah dalam kampanye anti Israel dan pembebasan
Palestina, Hizbullah sendiri juga turut mengirimkan pasukan terbaiknya
untuk bertempur di Suriah. China yang sebelum dibuat jengkel karena
ekspansi ekonominya yang strategis di Libya di hancurkan oleh Barat,
bakal memperjuangkan kepentingan ekonomis yang berharga di Suriah agar
tak kembali kecolongan seperti kejadian di Libya.
2. Federasi Bintang (Star Federation) aka ZEON
Kubu
ini di isi oleh Negara-negara teluk ato liga arab pro oposisi, Turki,
Israel, Amerika dan NATO. Secara militer jelas kubu ini jauh lebih
unggul ketimbang pihak Suriah, hanya masalah legitimasilah yang membuat
kekuatan militer kubu ini tak dikeluarkan secara langsung. Poros ini
memilih menggunakan tangan orang lain yakni para pemberontak dengan
memberikan dukungan dana, logistic, senjata, alat komunikasi dan
pelatihan militer. Sayangnya dukungan luar biasa poros ini terhadap
pemberontak ternyata tak memberikan hasil yang memuaskan.
Berkali-kali
pasukan pemberontak terpojok dan hampir binasa oleh serangan Pasukan
pemerintah suriah. Kubu ini juga didukung penuh oleh kekuatan media di
seluruh dunia, guna mengpropagandakan masyarakat internasional untuk
turut mendukung penggulihan rezim Assad. Bila pertempuran terus
berlanjut tanpa ada tanda –tanda kapan bisa berakhir, bisa jadi dengan
berbagai alasan, pasukan militer dari kubu ini akan memaksa untuk meng
intervensi secara langsung yang diperkirakan akan terjadi head to head
dengan kekuatan Rusia dan Iran di Suriah. Di dalam tubuh NATO pun hanya
Perancis dan Inggris yang masih bersedia mendukung penggulingan Assad,
Negara anggota NATO lain lebih memilih untuk menangani krisis yang
tengah melanda seluruh eropa.
Ada pihak yang percaya
bahwa upaya mengporak porandakan Suriah lebih disebabkan karena alasan
ekonomi, Suriah merupakan simpul dari jalur ekonomi paling legendaries
di dunia yakni Jalur Sutra. Jalur sutra melewati banyak Negara sehingga
tak mudah bagi satu pihak untuk menguasainya sekaligus, Pihak yang
berhasil menguasai simpul jalur sutra maka dia menguasai separuh jalur
sutra ! Rencana pembangunan pipa2 minyak dan gas yang melewati jalur
sutra sangat bernilai ekonomis tinggi, bagi pihak barat yang tengah
dilanda krisis ekonomi parah tentu saja proyek pipa2 ini membuatnya
tergiur. Selain masalah ekonomi, konon kabarnya Bila Suriah berhasil
ditundukan dan dikuasai barat maka gerbang utama untuk menyerang Iran
akan terbuka lebar.
Hanya suriahlah titik strategis untuk memasuki
wilayah Iran, Irak yang tadinya bisa digunakan sebagai gerbang menyerang
Iran ternyata justru berbalik merapat dan menjadi sekutu Iran. Sekarang
kondisi dilematis menggerogoti Suriah, bila pemerintahan Assad jatuh ke
pemberontak belum tentu kondisi Suriah akan lebih baik, Libya dan
Afghanistan sudah membukti hal itu, bukanya damai malah terjadi perang
sipil tak berkesudahan. Sedang bila Pemerintahan Assad tetap utuh maka
pemberontakan juga akan terus berkobar dimana rakyat Suriah bakal
semakin lama menderita.
At least, perang dunia
ini baru bisa berhenti bila pihak yang berseteru mau menahan diri dan
memilih menhentikan aksinya, duduk bersama dalam perundingan damai yang
mampu mengakomodir keinginan semua pihak. Perang hanya akan meninggalkan
bekas luka yang perih, memelihara kebencian, dendam yang tak berujung.
Sudah banyak korban tak berdosa dan kehilangan orang2 terkasih akibat
perang ini, siapapun yang menang dan kalah tak akan mampu mengembalikan
apa yang hilang sebelum perang ini terjadi. Peace for Suriah..
Korosareta kara
koroshite, koroshita kara korasarete.. Sore de saigo wa hontouni heiwa
ni narunokayo?! (Membunuh karena ada yang dibunuh.. dibunuh Karena
membunuh, kau pikir yang seperti itu akan bisa jadi kedamaian pada
akhirnya?!) – Gundam Seed
The top secret rules that allow NSA to use US data without a warrant
Fisa court submissions show broad scope of procedures governing NSA's surveillance of Americans' communication
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant
• Document one: procedures used by NSA to target non-US persons
• Document two: procedures used by NSA to minimise data collected from US persons
• Document one: procedures used by NSA to target non-US persons
• Document two: procedures used by NSA to minimise data collected from US persons
Top secret documents submitted to the court that oversees surveillance by US intelligence agencies show the judges have signed off on broad orders which allow the NSA to make use of information "inadvertently" collected from domestic US communications without a warrant.
The Guardian is publishing in full two documents submitted to the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (known as the Fisa court), signed by Attorney General Eric Holder and stamped 29 July 2009. They detail the procedures the NSA
is required to follow to target "non-US persons" under its foreign
intelligence powers and what the agency does to minimize data collected
on US citizens and residents in the course of that surveillance.
The
documents show that even under authorities governing the collection of
foreign intelligence from foreign targets, US communications can still
be collected, retained and used.
The procedures cover only part of the NSA's surveillance of domestic US communications. The bulk collection of domestic call records, as first revealed by the Guardian
earlier this month, takes place under rolling court orders issued on
the basis of a legal interpretation of a different authority, section 215 of the Patriot Act.
The Fisa court's oversight role has been referenced
many times by Barack Obama and senior intelligence officials as they
have sought to reassure the public about surveillance, but the
procedures approved by the court have never before been publicly
disclosed.
The top secret documents published today detail the
circumstances in which data collected on US persons under the foreign
intelligence authority must be destroyed, extensive steps analysts must
take to try to check targets are outside the US, and reveals how US call
records are used to help remove US citizens and residents from data
collection.
However, alongside those provisions, the Fisa court-approved policies allow the NSA to:
• Keep data that could potentially contain details of US persons for up to five years;
•
Retain and make use of "inadvertently acquired" domestic communications
if they contain usable intelligence, information on criminal activity,
threat of harm to people or property, are encrypted, or are believed to
contain any information relevant to cybersecurity;
• Preserve "foreign intelligence information" contained within attorney-client communications;
•
Access the content of communications gathered from "U.S. based
machine[s]" or phone numbers in order to establish if targets are
located in the US, for the purposes of ceasing further surveillance.
The
broad scope of the court orders, and the nature of the procedures set
out in the documents, appear to clash with assurances from President
Obama and senior intelligence officials that the NSA could not access Americans' call or email information without warrants.
The documents also show that discretion as to who is actually targeted under the NSA's
foreign surveillance powers lies directly with its own analysts,
without recourse to courts or superiors – though a percentage of
targeting decisions are reviewed by internal audit teams on a regular
basis.
Since the Guardian first revealed the extent of the NSA's
collection of US communications, there have been repeated calls for the
legal basis of the programs to be released. On Thursday, two US
congressmen introduced a bill compelling the Obama administration to declassify the secret legal justifications for NSA surveillance.
The
disclosure bill, sponsored by Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, and
Todd Rokita, an Indiana Republican, is a complement to one proposed in
the Senate last week. It would "increase the transparency of the Fisa
Court and the state of the law in this area," Schiff told the Guardian.
"It would give the public a better understanding of the safeguards, as
well as the scope of these programs."
Section 702 of the Fisa Amendments Act (FAA), which was renewed for five years last December, is the authority under which the NSA
is allowed to collect large-scale data, including foreign
communications and also communications between the US and other
countries, provided the target is overseas.
FAA warrants are issued by the Fisa
court for up to 12 months at a time, and authorise the collection of
bulk information – some of which can include communications of US
citizens, or people inside the US. To intentionally target either of
those groups requires an individual warrant.
One-paragraph order
One such warrant seen by the Guardian shows that they do not contain detailed legal rulings or explanation. Instead, the one-paragraph order, signed by a Fisa court judge in 2010, declares that the procedures submitted by the attorney general on behalf of the NSA are consistent with US law and the fourth amendment.
Those procedures state that the "NSA
determines whether a person is a non-United States person reasonably
believed to be outside the United States in light of the totality of the
circumstances based on the information available with respect to that
person, including information concerning the communications facility or
facilities used by that person".
It includes information that the NSA
analyst uses to make this determination – including IP addresses,
statements made by the potential target, and other information in the
NSA databases, which can include public information and data collected
by other agencies.
Where the NSA has no specific information on a person's location, analysts are free to presume they are overseas, the document continues.
"In
the absence of specific information regarding whether a target is a
United States person," it states "a person reasonably believed to be
located outside the United States or whose location is not known will be
presumed to be a non-United States person unless such person can be
positively identified as a United States person."
If it later
appears that a target is in fact located in the US, analysts are
permitted to look at the content of messages, or listen to phone calls,
to establish if this is indeed the case.
Referring to steps taken to prevent intentional collection of telephone content of those inside the US, the document states: "NSA
analysts may analyze content for indications that a foreign target has
entered or intends to enter the United States. Such content analysis
will be conducted according to analytic and intelligence requirements
and priorities."
Details set out in the "minimization procedures", regularly referred to in House and Senate hearings,
as well as public statements in recent weeks, also raise questions as
to the extent of monitoring of US citizens and residents.
NSA
minimization procedures signed by Holder in 2009 set out that once a
target is confirmed to be within the US, interception must stop
immediately. However, these circumstances do not apply to large-scale
data where the NSA claims it is unable to filter US communications from
non-US ones.
The NSA
is empowered to retain data for up to five years and the policy states
"communications which may be retained include electronic communications
acquired because of limitations on the NSA's ability to filter
communications".
Even if upon examination a communication is found to be domestic – entirely within the US – the NSA
can appeal to its director to keep what it has found if it contains
"significant foreign intelligence information", "evidence of a crime",
"technical data base information" (such as encrypted communications), or
"information pertaining to a threat of serious harm to life or
property".
Domestic communications containing none of the above
must be destroyed. Communications in which one party was outside the US,
but the other is a US-person, are permitted for retention under FAA rules.
The minimization procedure adds that these can be disseminated to other agencies or friendly governments if the US person is anonymised, or including the US person's identity under certain criteria.
A separate section of the same document notes that as soon as any
intercepted communications are determined to have been between someone
under US criminal indictment and their attorney, surveillance must stop.
However, the material collected can be retained, if it is useful,
though in a segregated database:
"The relevant portion of the
communication containing that conversation will be segregated and the
National Security Division of the Department of Justice will be notified
so that appropriate procedures may be established to protect such
communications from review or use in any criminal prosecution, while
preserving foreign intelligence information contained therein," the
document states.
In practice, much of the decision-making appears to lie with NSA analysts, rather than the Fisa court or senior officials.
A transcript of a 2008 briefing on FAA from the NSA's
general counsel sets out how much discretion NSA analysts possess when
it comes to the specifics of targeting, and making decisions on who they
believe is a non-US person. Referring to a situation where there has been a suggestion a target is within the US.
"Once
again, the standard here is a reasonable belief that your target is
outside the United States. What does that mean when you get information
that might lead you to believe the contrary? It means you can't ignore
it. You can't turn a blind eye to somebody saying: 'Hey, I think so and
so is in the United States.' You can't ignore that. Does it mean you
have to completely turn off collection the minute you hear that? No, it
means you have to do some sort of investigation: 'Is that guy right? Is
my target here?" he says.
"But, if everything else you have says
'no' (he talked yesterday, I saw him on TV yesterday, even, depending on
the target, he was in Baghdad) you can still continue targeting but you
have to keep that in mind. You can't put it aside. You have to
investigate it and, once again, with that new information in mind, what
is your reasonable belief about your target's location?"
The broad nature of the court's oversight role, and the discretion given to NSA analysts, sheds light on responses from the administration and internet companies to the Guardian's disclosure of the PRISM
program. They have stated that the content of online communications is
turned over to the NSA only pursuant to a court order. But except when a
US citizen is specifically targeted, the court orders used by the NSA
to obtain that information as part of Prism are these general FAA orders, not individualized warrants specific to any individual.
Once armed with these general orders, the NSA
is empowered to compel telephone and internet companies to turn over to
it the communications of any individual identified by the NSA. The Fisa court plays no role in the selection of those individuals, nor does it monitor who is selected by the NSA.
The NSA's
ability to collect and retain the communications of people in the US,
even without a warrant, has fuelled congressional demands for an
estimate of how many Americans have been caught up in surveillance.
Two
US senators, Ron Wyden and Mark Udall – both members of the Senate
intelligence committee – have been seeking this information since 2011,
but senior White House and intelligence officials have repeatedly
insisted that the agency is unable to gather such statistics.
US files criminal charges against NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden
Charges include theft of government property and unauthorised communication of national defence information
The US has filed espionage charges against the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and reports say authorities have requested that Hong Kong detain him for extradition. Legislators in Hong Kong responded by calling for mainland China to intervene in the case.
Snowden,
29, is charged with theft of government property, unauthorised
communication of national defence information and wilful communication
of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorised
person, according to court documents.
Snowden is reported to be in hiding in Hong Kong. The Washington Post
said the US had asked the autonomous Chinese territory to detain the
former NSA contractor on a provisional arrest warrent, while other
reports cited US officials as saying preparations were being made to
seek his extradition.
One Hong Kong legislator, Leung Kwok-hung,
said Beijing should instruct Hong Kong to protect Snowden from
extradition before the case was dragged through the court system. Leung
also urged the people of Hong Kong to "take to the streets to protect
Snowden". Another lawmaker, Cyd Ho, vice-chair of the pro-democracy
Labour party, said China "should now make its stance clear to the Hong
Kong SAR [special administrative region] government".
US
prosecutors have 60 days to file an indictment and can then take steps
to secure Snowden's extradition from Hong Kong for a criminal trial in
the US. Snowden would be able to challenge the request for his
extradition in court in Hong Kong.
The US extradition treaty with Hong Kong has an exception for political offences, which might include espionage.
Kristinn Hrafnsson, an Icelandic businessman linked to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, said on Thursday he had readied a private plane in China to fly Snowden to Iceland if Iceland's government would grant asylum. Iceland refused on Friday to say whether it would grant asylum to Snowden.
The
complaint against Snowden was filed at the federal court in the Eastern
District of Virginia where Snowden's former employer, government
contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, is headquartered. The complaint is dated
14 June, five days after Snowden was first revealed as the leaker.
The
US and Hong Kong have a standing agreement on the surrender of
fugitives. However, Snowden's appeal rights could drag out any
extradition proceeding. The success or failure also depends on what the
suspect is charged with under US law and how it corresponds to Hong Kong
law. In order for Hong Kong officials to honour the extradition request
they have to have some applicable statute under their law that
corresponds with a violation of US law.
Advocacy organisation the
Government Accountability Project said Snowden should be shielded from
prosecution by whistleblower protection laws. "He disclosed information
about a secret programme that he reasonably believed to be illegal, and
his actions alone brought about the long-overdue national debate about
the proper balance between privacy and civil liberties, on the one hand,
and national security on the other," the group said in a statement.
It is a well-known fact that Illuminati consist of Multi Millionaires,
BalasHapusBillionaires who have major influence regarding most global affairs,
including the planning of a New World Order. Many world leaders,
Presidents, Prime Ministers, royalty and senior executives of major Fortune
500 companies are members of Illuminati. join a secret cabal of mysterious
forces and become rich with boundless measures of wealth in your company or
any given business, the great Illuminati can make everything possible just
contact : join666cult@gmail.com or WhatsApp +1(646)481-0376 EL
IAI LEXION Thaddeus Iam Vice-President of Citizen Outreach THE ILLUMINATI
ORGANIZATION
Do not hesitate to contact us by WhatsApp.
Whatsapp: +1(646)481-0376
Email : join666cult@gmail.com
BEWARE OF SCAMMERS, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS REGISTRATION FEE AND YOU MUST
BE ABOVE THE AGE OF 18YRS.
THANKS...