Selasa, 10 Januari 2017

.......Meeting of signatories to nuclear deal presents opportunity to shore up support for one of president’s key foreign-policy legacies; Trump has called agreement ‘horrible’ ????....>>>> ....Under the nuclear deal, Iran is limited to a stockpile of low-enriched uranium of 300 kilograms, about 660 pounds, for the next 15 years—a key part of the deal designed to ensure that until at least 2026, it will take Iran over a year to accumulate enough material for a nuclear weapon.....>>...The meeting may also address the decision by the six powers to allow Iran to import large amounts of natural uranium. On Monday, Western diplomats confirmed that the U.S. had backed a request by Russia to export more than 100 tons of natural uranium to Iran. A second export request by Kazakhstan is pending, they said. Despite reservations in some European capitals, the decision to approve the Russian uranium export request was supported by the U.S. administration, according to several Western diplomats. It must still be confirmed by the United Nations Security Council. In its natural form, uranium isn’t useful in a nuclear program, but it can be enriched to produce fuel for a nuclear weapon. White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that “any sort of uranium that’s held by the Iranian government will be subject to very strict limits.”....>>..Tuesday’s proposed legislation would set in stone many of the sanctions the Obama administration levied against Russia after revelations of election-related cyberhacking, and significantly broaden the restrictions against companies seeking to invest in Russia’s energy sector and the state-run corporations that dominate the country’s economy.....>>> ...Russia is reportedly set to ship a huge consignment of natural uranium measuring 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) to Iran, in a move ratified by the outgoing U.S. administration and all other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. The move aimed at solidifying the landmark Iran nuclear deal, signed in July 2015, also compensates Iran for the 40 metric tons of heavy water (reactor coolant) exported by it to Russia, according to anonymous diplomats who spoke ahead of a meeting this week in Vienna of representatives of Iran, the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany to review Iranian complaints, the Associated Press (AP) reported...>>>

Obama Administration Seeks to Secure Iran Deal

Meeting of signatories to nuclear deal presents opportunity to shore up support for one of president’s key foreign-policy legacies; Trump has called agreement ‘horrible’ 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-administration-seeks-to-secure-iran-deal-1484044699

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, right, greeting Mohsen Hashemi, left, son of former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who died Sunday after suffering a heart attack, in a mourning ceremony at the Jamaran mosque in northern Tehran on Monday.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, right, greeting Mohsen Hashemi, left, son of former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who died Sunday after suffering a heart attack, in a mourning ceremony at the Jamaran mosque in northern Tehran on Monday. Photo: Ebrahim Noroozi/Associated Press
BRUSSELS—U.S., European and Iranian officials meet Tuesday in Vienna, a last opportunity for the Obama administration to bolster the Iranian nuclear agreement along with its partners before President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

The officials are meeting under the aegis of the so-called Joint Commission, comprised of representatives of Iran and the six world powers who negotiated the July 2015 nuclear deal. The commission oversees the implementation of the accord and arbitrates disputes among the signatories.

In recent months, the Commission has approved decisions to exempt some Iranian nuclear material from the country’s stockpile limits and sought to shore up the agreement with measures to ensure Iran doesn’t breach the terms of the nuclear accord by exceeding caps on material such as uranium and heavy water.

During the U.S. presidential campaign, Mr. Trump repeatedly attacked the accord, a key foreign-policy legacy of the Obama administration. After the Nov. 8 election, U.S. officials said they were looking for ways to help secure the agreement.

Among the issues set for discussion Tuesday are Iranian complaints about the decision last month by U.S. Congress to extend nonnuclear U.S. sanctions on Tehran, according to diplomats.

The meeting may also address the decision by the six powers to allow Iran to import large amounts of natural uranium. On Monday, Western diplomats confirmed that the U.S. had backed a request by Russia to export more than 100 tons of natural uranium to Iran. A second export request by Kazakhstan is pending, they said.

Despite reservations in some European capitals, the decision to approve the Russian uranium export request was supported by the U.S. administration, according to several Western diplomats. It must still be confirmed by the United Nations Security Council.

In its natural form, uranium isn’t useful in a nuclear program, but it can be enriched to produce fuel for a nuclear weapon. White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that “any sort of uranium that’s held by the Iranian government will be subject to very strict limits.”

U.S. officials say Iran could use the uranium from Russia to fuel its nuclear power plant at Bushehr. Iran was required to submit plans for use of the material, which will be monitored, the officials say, for the next 25 years.

Under the nuclear deal, Iran is limited to a stockpile of low-enriched uranium of 300 kilograms, about 660 pounds, for the next 15 years—a key part of the deal designed to ensure that until at least 2026, it will take Iran over a year to accumulate enough material for a nuclear weapon.
Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear program is for purely civilian purposes.

Iran received shipments of natural uranium before the agreement was fully implemented in January 2016. Those transfers, mandated by the 2015 accord, came after Iran to ship enriched uranium out of the country. Additional imports of natural uranium were neither ruled out nor clearly permitted, requiring Iran to make a specific request to the Joint Commission’s procurement group.

While natural uranium can’t be used directly in a nuclear program, the material would give Iran, if it decided to repudiate the nuclear agreement, an additional supply of ready-to-use material that it could quickly enrich into nuclear fuel. Iran still has the technology, including thousands of centrifuges, to purify the uranium into more dangerous forms.

France and Britain, two signatories of the accord, raised concerns about the uranium exports during weekslong discussions over the Russian export request, according to three diplomats.
Officials pressed for more details on the destination of the material and where it would be stored. Additional explanations, they said, were needed partly because Iran has its own uranium mines.

“We also wanted to know why they needed it,” one of the diplomats said.
While French officials took a hawkish line both during the nuclear talks and the deal’s implementation, several people involved in the discussions said it was the U.K. that had become increasingly skeptical in recent months.

However, neither Britain nor France, which are both represented on the group that makes recommendations on Iran’s procurement requests, blocked Russia’s export request. Moscow’s support will also be needed to approve the Kazakh uranium delivery.
Mr. Trump hasn’t made clear since his election victory how he specifically plans to approach the Iranian nuclear deal. While he frequently denounced the agreement during the presidential campaign, his only public mention of it since the November vote was in a tweet on Israel in which he labeled it “horrible.”

The Obama legacy

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_obama_legacy.html 

Nothing sums up the Obama legacy better than this quote from Edward Luce of the Financial Times:
It will be as if Mr Obama was never here.
Can there be a more concise judgment?
History will remember Barack Obama as the first black president.  Beyond that, what else?  His attempt to transform the nation worsened economic and social conditions.  He transformed his own party to the point where it may not survive.
Mr. Luce explained what will occur domestically:
The Obama erasure will go far deeper than undoing domestic laws, or foreign deals. Mr Trump will repeal Obamacare, or alter it beyond recognition. He will “keep an open mind” about whether to pull the US out of the Paris agreement on climate change and quite probably blow up the US-Iran nuclear deal.
The American people demanded the destruction of Obamaism.  In order to survive, the Democratic Party will disown their Pied Piper, eventually abhorring his policies more than conservatives.
Despite his overall judgment, Mr. Luce's assessment of Barack Obama is more positive and gracious than mine:
Here was a highly intelligent leader, and a fundamentally decent one, who strived to make the case for international co-operation to a world that was not really listening.
… But the world’s attention has wandered. People are highly fearful — and rightly so.
Such an assessment is flattering and fawning in these respects:
  1. The "highly intelligent leader" might be described as painfully ignorant of how the world works or a committed ideologue to a system that always fails.  Given Obama's educational opportunities, stupidity rather than ignorance seems appropriate.
  2. The "fundamentally decent one" routinely lied to the American people in order to pass harmful policies.  He illegally utilized the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service for political purposes and engaged in cover-ups (gun-running to Mexico, Benghazi, etc.) to protect himself.
  3. Obama's approach to governance was dictatorial.  He went around Congress with executive orders, many of which were overturned by the courts.  He famously terminated at least one discussion with: "I won, you lost."
If Obama is to be more than a William Henry Harrison footnote in history, it will be as a result of future events.

Foreign Policy

Mr Luce states:
The global role that Mr Obama inherited – and tried, to some degree, to uphold is now in tatters.
If legacies can be achieved via future disasters, Mr. Obama still has a chance.  His feckless "lead from behind" foreign policy leaves the world vulnerable to conflict.  Like his domestic policies, most international agreements were made without congressional approval.
If the world unravels, Mr. Obama has the potential to become history's next Sir Edward Grey.  

Post-Presidency

Obama is young for an ex-president.  What he does with this time will influence history's assessment.  That may not be a positive. 

Obama's narcissism and need for attention will make it difficult to leave the stage.  As a media favorite, he will always have a platform.  As an ex-president, even a failed one, he may make positive contributions.  These should be welcomed.

If Obama's need for the stage outweighs his positive contributions, he will become a public nuisance.  Past behavior suggests that this should be expected.  Obama is likely to try to become the Community Organizer of The World.  History is unlikely to look kindly on such an effort.
Monty Pelerin blogs on politics, economics and investing at www.economicnoise.com.
 

Senators Propose New Sanctions on Russia 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/senators-propose-new-sanctions-on-russia-1484082480?mod=whatnext&cx_navSource=cx_picks&cx_tag=poptarget&cx_artPos=4#cxrecs_s

Legislation backed by key Republican and Democratic lawmakers could limit Trump’s reset of Russia ties

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., introducing a bipartisan bill to increase sanctions on Russia on Tuesday.
Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., introducing a bipartisan bill to increase sanctions on Russia on Tuesday. Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images

WASHINGTON—Leading U.S. senators from both parties proposed new sanctions against Russia that would markedly increase Moscow’s economic isolation and could limit President-elect Donald Trump’s ability to improve ties with the Kremlin.

Tuesday’s proposed legislation would set in stone many of the sanctions the Obama administration levied against Russia after revelations of election-related cyberhacking, and significantly broaden the restrictions against companies seeking to invest in Russia’s energy sector and the state-run corporations that dominate the country’s economy.

The sanctions, which U.S. officials acknowledge could lead to retaliation by the Kremlin, also would directly target U.S. and foreign banks that help Russia sell sovereign debt, a restriction the Obama administration had previously preferred to assert more informally, through conversations with Wall Street executives.
“We have been attacked by Russia. That’s no longer up to any debate,” said Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.), one of the sponsors of the bill. “It cannot be business as usual.”

The measure, called the “Countering Russian Hostilities Act of 2017,” has been spearheaded as well by Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John McCain of Arizona, Republicans who have differed sharply with Mr. Trump’s skepticism over U.S. intelligence agencies’ finding that the Kremlin was behind last year’s cyberhacking of the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and some Republican-affiliated targets.

Other Republican co-sponsors include Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida, Rob Portman of Ohio and Ben Sasse of Nebraska. The bill so far has bipartisan support among 10 U.S. senators, its backers say.

While any bill introduced by the senators could be scaled back in committee or in the broader Senate or House, Congress in recent years has been willing to take the lead in punishing Russia, even when the Obama administration has urged a more targeted approach.
God created the world in seven days. The Obama administration has two days more than that to destroy it.
—Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova
The measure would provide the White House with the ability to waive the sanctions, but it would have to certify that Russia’s international behavior has improved. “The waiver is not to be used unless progress is made,” Mr. Cardin said.

Responding to the election-year hacking, the proposed legislation would impose visa bans and asset freezes on foreigners tied to cybersecurity breaches, ban transactions with key Russian intelligence agencies and codify in law President Barack Obama’s recent executive order on cybersecurity.

The bill also would take in the sanctions on Russia,Mr. Obama imposed after Moscow’s interference in Ukraine and its move to annex Crimea. It could thus hamstring Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to lobby the Trump administration and European leaders to end those sanctions, a step Mr. Trump hasn’t ruled out.

Moscow’s reaction was dismissive. “Every day I read the news from Washington,” said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. “God created the world in seven days. The Obama administration has two days more than that to destroy it.”
None of us know the position of the president-elect, but we do know and should know the position of the Congress.
—Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.)
Sanctions brought by the U.S. executive branch can be more easily removed as Washington’s relations with other countries improve. But it can take years or decades to roll back punitive laws passed by Congress, such as those that still apply to Cuba and Iran.

It wasn’t clear Tuesday whether the bill is likely to win congressional approval in time for Mr. Obama to sign it, or wait for the start of the Trump administration. Either way, if passed it stands to exert pressure on Mr. Trump’s stance on ties with Mr. Putin.

“None of us know the position of the president-elect, but we do know and should know the position of the Congress,” Mr. McCain said.

Mr. Graham said he was confident the bill would get overwhelming support, but allies of Mr. Trump could seek to block it. Mr. Trump’s transition team didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Trump’s nominee for secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, will strike a tougher line on Russia than some lawmakers anticipated during his confirmation hearing on Wednesday. “We must be cleared-eyed about our relationship with Russia,” Mr. Tillerson will say, according to excerpts of his testimony that were released. “Our NATO allies are right to be alarmed at a resurgent Russia.”

A decision to sign or veto the measure could place Mr. Trump in an awkward position, but having fresh sanctions in place also would strain ties with Russia.
To criticize and try to isolate Russia is a crazy idea.
—Andranik Migranyan of Moscow State University
Mr. Putin refrained from retaliating after Mr. Obama in December imposed the new round of cybersecurity-related sanctions and expelled dozens of alleged Russian intelligence operatives from the U.S. Mr. Putin’s restraint won plaudits from Mr. Trump.

Despite Mr. Putin’s reaction last month, the strict new measures, if enacted, could lead to retaliation from Moscow. After U.S. enactment of the 2012 Magnitsky Act, Moscow banned U.S. adoptions of Russian children and took other measures that soured ties and helped end Mr. Obama’s efforts to “reset” relations with Moscow.

“To criticize and try to isolate Russia is a crazy idea,” said Andranik Migranyan, an top Russian academic at Moscow State University. “Russia has the luxury at the moment to see what Trump will try to do.”

The proposed legislation would take the Ukraine-related sanctions even further by ordering sanctions on investments of $20 million or more that help Russia develop its oil and natural-gas reserves. Most significantly, it would impose mandatory sanctions on U.S. and other companies that help Russia privatize state-owned assets.

Stung by the earlier sanctions, Russia has recently reached out to major international firms to offer stakes in state-run companies in exchange for increasingly precious foreign currency to pay debt. The recent gain in energy prices has alleviated some of Moscow’s near-term financial problems, but the sanctions still take a toll on the economy and the investment climate.
The proposed legislation would establish a unit at the U.S. Treasury Department to track allegedly illicit financial flows emanating from Russia and support programs to counteract Russia’s state-led media, which U.S. intelligence services say was used in the 2016 election in the U.S. and in other countries.

The sanctions legislation could face significant opposition from U.S. energy companies that do business in Russia, including Exxon Mobil Corp., whose former chief executive is Mr. Trump’s pick for secretary of state.
The bill could put immediate pressure on the incoming Trump administration to take a tougher stance on Russia, since broad skepticism of Moscow on Capitol Hill means lawmakers would have a shot at overriding a presidential veto.

Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com and William Mauldin at william.mauldin@wsj.com


 Russia Trading Weapons To Iran? Tehran To Receive Uranium Batch: Report

http://www.ibtimes.com/russia-trading-weapons-iran-tehran-receive-uranium-batch-report-2472948


  • Iranian Nuclear Deal
    Iranian workers stand outside Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant, about 750 miles south of Tehran, on Oct. 26, 2010. Photo: Reuters/Mehr News Agency/Majid Asgaripour 
     
     
    Russia is reportedly set to ship a huge consignment of natural uranium measuring 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) to Iran, in a move ratified by the outgoing U.S. administration and all other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.
    The move aimed at solidifying the landmark Iran nuclear deal, signed in July 2015, also compensates Iran for the 40 metric tons of heavy water (reactor coolant) exported by it to Russia, according to anonymous diplomats who spoke ahead of a meeting this week in Vienna of representatives of Iran, the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany to review Iranian complaints, the Associated Press (AP) reported.
    However, the latest move may unsettle the incoming U.S. administration led by President-elect Donald Trump and several other American lawmakers who have already articulated their criticism of the deal.
    During his election rallies, Trump had already pledged to withdraw support from the deal. Separately, he also told an Israeli lobbying group that “it was the worst deal ever negotiated” and that it was his “number one priority to dismantle it.” Other members of the Trump transition team such as Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who will be the president-elect’s National Security Advisor and Mike Pompeo, who is taking over as director of the CIA, have also similarly denounced the deal.
    Although Iran has pledged to peaceful use of the nuclear technology and diplomats claim that the transferred natural uranium would be under strict overwatch by the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency for 25 years after implementation of the deal, the main concerns for many in the U.S. is whether Iran will continue to be committed to the civilian use of nuclear energy as the uranium can be enriched to produce atomic weapons.

    “No part of the JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] obligates the P5+1 to gift the Iranian regime tons of natural uranium, which can be further enriched to build bombs. ... This is one more reckless unilateral concession that the Obama administration should forgo, particularly amid reports that Iran has been close to exhausting its domestic deposits,” Matan Shamir, executive director at the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, told the Algemeiner.
    Similarly, David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security think tank, that reportedly briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran's nuclear program, was quoted by the AP as saying that Iran could potentially make 10 simple nuclear bombs — “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.”
    However, U.S. officials like State Department spokesman John Kirby and White House spokesman Josh Earnest downplayed the fears. They also did not confirm the reported agreement.
    Kirby, for instance, told reporters there is no ban on such imports by Iran and Earnest reportedly said such arrangements are "subject to the careful monitoring and inspections that are included in the deal toensure that Iran is living up to the commitments that they made." ensure that Iran is living up to the commitments that they made."




    The move aimed at solidifying the landmark Iran nuclear deal, signed in July 2015, also compensates Iran for the 40 metric tons of heavy water (reactor coolant) exported by it to Russia, according to anonymous diplomats who spoke ahead of a meeting this week in Vienna of representatives of Iran, the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany to review Iranian complaints, the Associated Press (AP) reported.
    However, the latest move may unsettle the incoming U.S. administration led by President-elect Donald Trump and several other American lawmakers who have already articulated their criticism of the deal.

    During his election rallies, Trump had already pledged to withdraw support from the deal. Separately, he also told an Israeli lobbying group that “it was the worst deal ever negotiated” and that it was his “number one priority to dismantle it.” Other members of the Trump transition team such as Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who will be the president-elect’s National Security Advisor and Mike Pompeo, who is taking over as director of the CIA, have also similarly denounced the deal.

    Although Iran has pledged to peaceful use of the nuclear technology and diplomats claim that the transferred natural uranium would be under strict overwatch by the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency for 25 years after implementation of the deal, the main concerns for many in the U.S. is whether Iran will continue to be committed to the civilian use of nuclear energy as the uranium can be enriched to produce atomic weapons.

    “No part of the JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] obligates the P5+1 to gift the Iranian regime tons of natural uranium, which can be further enriched to build bombs. ... This is one more reckless unilateral concession that the Obama administration should forgo, particularly amid reports that Iran has been close to exhausting its domestic deposits,” Matan Shamir, executive director at the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, told the Algemeiner.

    Similarly, David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security think tank, that reportedly briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran's nuclear program, was quoted by the AP as saying that Iran could potentially make 10 simple nuclear bombs — “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.”

    However, U.S. officials like State Department spokesman John Kirby and White House spokesman Josh Earnest downplayed the fears. They also did not confirm the reported agreement.
    Kirby, for instance, told reporters there is no ban on such imports by Iran and Earnest reportedly said such arrangements are "subject to the careful monitoring and inspections that are included in the deal to ensure that Iran is living up to the commitments that they made."
    Kirby, for instance, told reporters there is no ban on such imports by Iran and Earnest reportedly said such arrangements are "subject to the careful monitoring and inspections that are included in the deal to ensure that Iran is living up to the commitments that they made."


    Agency for 25 years after implementation of the deal, the main concerns for many in the U.S. is whether Iran will continue to be committed to the civilian use of nuclear energy as the uranium can be enriched to produce atomic weapons.
     

1 komentar:

  1. KAMI SEKELUARGA TAK LUPA MENGUCAPKAN PUJI SYUKUR KEPADA ALLAH S,W,T
    dan terima kasih banyak kepada AKI atas nomor yang AKI
    beri 4 angka [1869] alhamdulillah ternyata itu benar2 tembus .
    dan alhamdulillah sekarang saya bisa melunasi semua utan2 saya yang
    ada sama tetangga.dan juga BANK BRI dan bukan hanya itu KI. insya
    allah saya akan coba untuk membuka usaha sendiri demi mencukupi
    kebutuhan keluarga saya sehari-hari itu semua berkat bantuan AKI..
    sekali lagi makasih banyak ya AKI… bagi saudara yang suka PASANG NOMOR
    yang ingin merubah nasib seperti saya silahkan hubungi KI JAYA,,di no (((085-321-606-847)))
    insya allah anda bisa seperti saya…menang NOMOR 750 JUTA , wassalam.

    BalasHapus