IDE MEMBUNUH BARAK OBAMA..??? ... APAKAH INI HANYA HALUSINASI...??? ATAUKAH SEPETI KEPADA JFK..[JOHN F. KENNEDY..]..???>> SIAPA LAGI YANG INGIN MEMBUNUH PRESIDEN USA...??>> BUKANKAH JFK DAN ABE LINCOLN ...SUDAH DIBUNUH...OLEH...KONON KONSPIRASI...???>> BENARKAH...??>>.........Ide tentang "membunuh Barack Obama" sama sekali bukan sekedar halusinasi. Pemilik dan penerbit koran Atlanta Jewish Times berdarah yahudi, Andrew Adler, secara terbuka bahkan menulis tentang ide tersebut di media miliknya. Menurut Adler, Israel seharusnya mengirimkan tim pembunuh Mossad untuk melakukannya. Alih-alih ditangkap dan dijatuhi hukuman mati karena kejahatan yang sangat serius itu, Adler hanya mengundurkan diri dari jabatan di koran miliknya. ....>>> ....sebagian besar rakyat Amerika yang kini sadar bahwa "teori konspirasi" memang benar ada, mereka berfikir seribu kali untuk melakukannya lagi untuk tidak melihat fenomena "Arab Springs" bangkit di Amerika....>>> ..... Sampai 10 tahun yang lalu orang-orang yahudi itu tidak akan segan untuk membunuh seorang presiden Amerika, sebagaimana mereka lakukan terhadap John F. Kennedy yang menurut Michael Collins Piper dalam bukunya Final Judgement disebabkan karena Kennedy menghalangi program nuklir Israel, atau Abraham Lincoln yang dibunuh karena bermaksud menerbitkan uang pemerintah dan meninggalkan uang kertas buatan bankir yahudi, atau terhadap 2 atau 3 presiden lainnya yang tewas dibunuh saat menjabat sebagai presiden Amerika. ...>>> ....Dominasi yahudi jahat penyembah berhala di segala aspek kehidupan manusia niscaya akan membuat orang "tercerahkan" akan menangis berputus asa. Sistem ekonomi dimana kita hidup yang diliputi oleh praktik ribawi, media massa dan hiburan yang kita tonton, hingga para politisi yang kita pilih, semuanya berada di bawah "kendali" mereka....>>> ....tanda-tanda itu sebenarnya sudah tampak bertahun-tahun lalu. Dimulai dari tumbangnya regim Shah Pahlevi pro-zionis oleh gerakan Revolusi Islam Iran tahun 1979, terusirnya Israel dari Lebanon tahun 2000 dan kegagalan mereka menguasai kembali Lebanon tahun 2006, dan kegagalan menumbangkan pemerintahan Syria yang anti-Israel setelah Presiden Barak Obama secara mengejutkan berani menolak tekanan Israel untuk menyerang Syria dan Iran....>>> ....Salah satu yang membuat Israel melakukan agresi ke Gaza dua bulan silam salah satunya adalah untuk mencari sumber minyak baru dan air. Sudah beberapa waktu belakangan ini, Israel dilanda kekeringan. Sementara Hamas, sebagai penentang Israel nomor 1, seperti diprediksi banyak orang, malah semakin kuat pasca-agresi ke Gaza....>>> ... Paham Anti-Semit terjadi sedemikian rupa di luar perkiraan Israel sendiri. Isyu Holocaust yang selama ini dijadikan pelindung bagi Yahudi, perlahan-lahan mulai surut, dan bahkan banyak masyarakat Eropa sendiri yang tidak percaya kepada Holocaust sebenarnya...>>> ...negara penjajah Israel jelas kehilangan kemampuannya untuk melakukan peleburan dengan bangsa lain di kawasan Timur Tengah. Ini karena Israel hampir tidak beda dengan Barat dan merupakan kepanjangan kepentingan dan politik mereka di Timur Tengah. Misalnya saja dengan Mesir. Walau pada intinya, pemerintah Mesir berkongsi dengan Israel, namun masyarakatnya sendiri jelas-jelas menolak Zionis dalam bentuk apapun....>>> ....“Hati nurani saya tidak bisa diam saja mengetahui pemerintah AS menghancurkan privasi, kebebasan internet dan kebebasan mendasar.” Snowden mengatakan kepada surat kabar The Guardian bahwa dulu dia bekerja di keamanan TI untuk CIA dan pada tahun 2007 dia ditempatkan dengan diplomatik tertutup di Jenewa, Swiss, di mana dia memiliki akses ke berbagai dokumen rahasia. “Banyak dari apa yang saya lihat di Jenewa benar-benar mengecewakan saya tentang bagaimana fungsi pemerintah saya dan apa dampaknya di dunia,” katanya. “Saya menyadari bahwa saya adalah bagian dari sesuatu yang jauh lebih mendekati kejahatan daripada kebaikan.” Dia berhenti pada tahun 2009 dan kemudian mulai bekerja untuk Booz Allen Hamilton, kontraktor untuk NSA, di Hawaii. Di sanalah, tiga minggu yang lalu, dia memutuskan untuk membocorkan informasi tentang Prism. “Saya berharap ini akan menyadarkan penduduk di seluruh dunia mengenai dunia seperti apa yang sebenarnya kita inginkan untuk hidup,” katanya kepada Guardian. “Saya dengan hati nurani saya tidak bisa membiarkan pemerintah AS menghancurkan privasi, kebebasan internet dan kebebasan mendasar orang-orang di seluruh dunia dengan mesin pengawas raksasa yang diam-diam mereka bangun.”...>>> ...Mungkin bagi orang awam, keuntungan penjualan minyak akan dinikmati oleh negara-negara penghasil minyak seperti Arab Saudi, Kuwait, Uni Emirat Arab, Libya dan Indonesia. Namun kenyataannya meskipun ladang produksi minyaknya ada di Arab Saudi dll, namun sebagian besar perusahaan penambang dan pengolah minyaknya dimiliki oleh perusahaan asing, Rockefeller beserta kolega-koleganya. Di Indonesia sendiri, 90% perusahaan minyak yang ada dimiliki oleh perusahaan asing. Maka jangan heran sebagai salah satu negara penghasil minyak, tidak ada sedikitpun jejak keuntungan besar yang diraup oleh negara ini. Sedikitpun dana yang ada belum terkorupsi, dana ini, dana itu yang tidak jelas kemana larinya....>>> SEMOGA SADAR..LAH PARA PEMERINTAHAN NEGARA2...YANG DIJAJAH OLEH PARA MAFIA...MIGAS INTERNASIONAL ITU...???>> ...Politisi sejati haruslah mampu meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat, kesadaran terhadap Islam. Sehingga terbentuk hubungan timbal balik antara rakyat dan penguasa yang saling melengkapi. Penguasa berkewajiban menerapkan aturan Islam dan rakyat juga memiliki kewajiban untuk memperingatkan penguasa agar menerapkan dan tidak melenceng dari aturan tersebut....>>> ...Ada yang mengatakan bahwa kenaikan BBM boleh saja, asalkan uangnya digunakan untuk bangun jalan atau fasilitas lainnya. Hal ini seolah benar, tapi tunggu dulu jangan terlalu cepat mengambil kesimpulan. Bukankah Negeri ini kaya sumber alam yang terbentang dari Aceh hingga Papua? Bukan sekedar cerita penghibur untuk anak sebelum tidur, tapi ini fakta yang tidak bisa dipungkiri adanya. Hampir seluruh SDA Negeri bernama Indonesia dibawah bendera amerika dan negara lainnya. Itu artinya kita belumlah merdeka. Bidang ekonomi masih terjajah melalui tangan Mafia Berkeley penghianat bangsa...>>....Hingga saat ini, 40 perusahan asing sudah memegang izin prinsip pendirian stasiun pengisian bahan bakar umum (SPBU). Masing-masing perusahaan memiliki hak mendirikan 20.000 SPBU. Menurut pengamat ekonomi UGM yokyakarta, Revrison Baswir: Itu artinya, sejumlah 800.000 SPBU milik asing akan menguasai Indonesia. Bayangkan nantinya seluruh kebutuhan minyak harus dibeli dari perusahan asing dan asing akan menguasai seluruh produksi Indonesia dari hulu ke hilir, termasuk warung-warung. Makanya SPBU milik Cevron, Shell, Petronas, akan merajalela di Negeri ini. Dari sini terlihat jelas, jika harga BBM dinaikkan, siapa yang dirugikan dan siapa sebaliknya yang diuntungkan. (Suara Pembaruan,18/6). Kontan saja swasta asing mendapat keuntungan besar ketika naiknya harga minyak mentah dunia. ..>> .....Siapa yang membuat peraturan tersebut? jawabannya tidak lain adalah para politisi yang ada di Senayan. Konon katanya mereka berasal dari berbagai partai politik. Kenapa peraturan itu masih bercokol dan tidak segera dihapus sebagai upaya menghapus penjajahan, katanya Negeri ini anti penjajahan. Tapi kenapa keberadaan UU tersebut masih dipertahankan. Sebenarnya inilah yang menjadi akar persoalan dari carut-marutnya pengelolaan SDA yang dilegalkan....>>> Jika diteliti lebih jauh ternyata penyebab mahalnya harga minyak adalah karena adanya peraturan, berupa UU migas. Swasta asing diperbolehkan melakukan aktivitas ekplorasi dan ekploitasi. Berupa usaha pada sektor hulu dan juga sektor hilirnya (pengolahan, pengangkutan, penyimpanan dan penjualan)....>>> ...... “Memberikan pinjaman kepada suatu pemerintahan akan jauh lebih menguntungkan daripada kepada individu. Nilai pinjaman lebih besar & hutangnya dijamin oleh “Pajak” dari “Rakyatnya” ~ 1760, Mayer Amschel Rothschild....>>> ...... Maka ucapan Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777-1836) ….”Saya tidak peduli ‘siapa boneka’ yang akan dipilih menjadi Raja Inggris untuk memimpin kekaisaran yang mataharinya tidak pernah terbenam. Orang yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris mengendalikan kekaisaran Inggris, dan sayalah yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris!” kini bisa berubah menjadi ….”Saya tidak peduli ‘siapa boneka’ yang akan dipilih menjadi Raja Penguasa Dunia saat ini (presiden Amerika) untuk memimpin kekaisaran yang mataharinya akan terbit dari sini. Orang yang mengontrol suplai uang Dunialah (melalui World Bank & IMF) mengendalikan kekaisaran Dunia, dan keluarga sayalah yang mengontrol suplai uang Dunia!”..>>> ...Tentang Indonesia John Perkins menulis… ”Tolak ukur perekonomian nasional terbukti tak bisa di percaya. Seperti yg sering terjadi, nilai tukar uang yg cantik, neraca perdagangan yg bagus, inflansi yg rendah, dan angka pertumbuhan GDP Indonesia yg mengesankan, hanya mencerminkan kondisi sebagian kecil penduduk kaya. Sementara sebagian besarnya terpinggirkan dari arus perekonomian yg terukur. Merekalah yg menanggung beban luar biasa”………”Berbagai korporasi besar berkaliber internasional, didukung kebijakan “Bank Dunia” (Dajjal) yg mendorong “privatisasi” dan “keringanan pajak” untuk “perusahaan2 asing”, mempekerjakan sendiri atau melimpahkan proyek ke pabrik2 yg mengupah buruhnya terlalu rendah. Dan seandainya mereka protes, mereka akan dihajar atau dibunuh. Para buruh ini hidup penuh penderitaan agar barang bisa dijual dengan harga rendah di toko “Negara2 Maju”...>>> ...Bukankah John F Kennedy sebelum kematiannya pernah mengatakan adanya sesuatu kekuasaan bayangan yang lebih berbahaya? Kata-kata bijak Abraham Lincoln, “Pemerintahlah yg seharusnya mencetak dan mengedarkan uang sesuai dengan kemampuan belanja dari pemerintah dan daya beli masyarakat. Dengan mengadopsi prinsip ini, rakyat bisa di bebaskan dari bunga pajak yg sangat memberatkan. Uang akan menjadi pelayan manusia, bukan majikannya!”..>> ..Leluhur George W Bush, Prescott Bush adalah Managing Director bank investasi Brown Brothers, Harriman 1920-1940, dengan bantuan perusahaan2 Averell HArriman, Rockefeller, DuPont, JP Morgan & Ford sebagai sumber keuangan utama membantu membiayai Hitler dari tanah Amerika di saat tentara Amerika sedang berperang dengan Jerman lewat cara mendanai naiknya Adolf Hitler ke kursi kekuasaan tahun 1923. Perusahaan2 tersebut membiayai secara langsung pasukan khusus Nazi (SS & SA) yg dananya disalurkan melalui berbagai perusahaan Jerman. Prescott melalui perusahaan pelayaran Hamburg-Amerika Steamship, bankir Nazi Fritz Thyssen, Standart Oil Jerman, perusahaan Baja Jerman STeel Trust & IG. Farben memanfaatkan Union Bank Corporation untuk menyalurkan sejumlah besar dana ke Nazi dan mengelola kepentingan mereka. Keuntungan dari investasi di perusahaan Nazi tersebut diterima kembali oleh Prescott dan sekutunya di Wall Street...>> ..... .......HAYOO BERSIHKAN SENAYAN DAN ISTANA...DARI ANTEK2 MAFIA INTERNASIONAL...??>> MAFIA SDA..DAN MIGAS...HARUS SEGERA DIBERSIHKAN..DARI BUMI INDONESIA...??>> HAYYOO KEMBALI KEPADA UUD 1945 YANG ASLI... DAN BEBASKAN NEGARA INI DARI CENGKERAMAN MAFIA JAHAT YANG DIPIMPIN OLEH PARA PENJAJAH KRIMINAL INTERNASIONAL...DAN ANTEK2NYA... DI DALAM NEGERI...???>> SADARLAH WAHAI BANGSA INDONESIA... NAHWA MAFIA2 ITU TERNYATA ADA KOLABORASINYA DINEGERI INI...??>> BANGKITLAH BANGSAKU... BANGSA INDONESIA..SEJATI.... ....>>> ...>>

Pernyataan Para Kapitalis Tentang Penguasaan Dunia

http://votreesprit.wordpress.com/2011/12/10/pernyataan-para-kapitalis-tentang-penguasaan-dunia/

• “Berikan kepada saya kontrol mata uang sebuah bangsa & saya tidak peduli siapa yang membuat hukum!” ~ Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

• ”Saya tidak peduli ‘siapa boneka’ yang akan dipilih menjadi Raja Inggris untuk memimpin kekaisaran yang mataharinya tidak pernah terbenam. Orang yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris mengendalikan kekaisaran Inggris, dan sayalah yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris!” ~ Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777-1836)

• ”Di satu sisi ada sekelompok orang yang memegang kekuasaan karena mereka memiliki kekayaan besar, yang mengendalikan semua pekerja dan perdagangan, yang memanipulasi untuk kepentingan pribadi semua suplai uang, yang bahkan lebih berpengaruh daripada pemerintah sendiri, di sisi lain ada sekelompok besar lainnya yang tidak berdaya dan hidup menderita. Bunga pinjaman (riba) yang sudah berkali-kali dilarang oleh gereja, masih di praktekkan hari ini walaupun dalam bentuk yang berbeda supaya sekelompok kecil orang kaya bisa mendapatkan keuntungan dari orang miskin yang hidup hanya sedikit lebih baik dibanding seorang budak” ~ Paus Leo XIII pada 1898

• ”Kekuatan dari kapitalisme finansial memiliki sebuah rencana yang lebih jauh, yaitu menciptakan sebuah sistem finansial dunia yang dikendalikan oleh tangan swasta yang mana orang2 ini juga dapat mendominasi sistem politik dan ekonomi dari setiap negara secara keseluruhan. Sistem ini dikendalikan dengan model feodal oleh bank sentral di seluruh dunia yang menjalankan rencana ini secara bersama-sama” ~ Carrol Quigley, professor & sejarawan dari Georgetown University AS dalam buku Tragedy & Hope (1975)

• ”Bila pemerintah tergantung pada para bankir untuk mendapatkan uang, maka bankirlah dan bukan pemerintah yang sedang memegang kendali. Tangan yang memberi di atas tangan yang menerima. Uang tidak mengenal Nasionalisme, para bankir tidak memiliki patriotisme, satu-satu tujuan mereka adalah ‘keuntungan’ “ ~ Napoleon (1800)

• “Sistem perbankan modern menciptakan uang tanpa modal. Proses ini kemungkinan adalah ciptaan paling luar biasa yang pernah di temukan. Perbankan dilahirkan dalam ketidaksetaraan dan dosa. Bankir memiliki Dunia. Anda bisa mengambil apapun dari mereka, tapi biarkan hak untuk menciptakan uang ditangan mereka, maka dengan sebatang pena mereka akan menciptakan cukup uang untuk ‘membeli semuanya kembali’. Ambillah kekuasaan besar ini dari tangan mereka, maka kekayaan besar seperti yang saya miliki akan lenyap, dan akan ada sebuah dunia yang lebih baik untuk hidup. Akan tetapi, bila Anda ingin terus menjadi Budak dari Bank dan membayar Harga dari Perbudakan, biarkanlah para Bankir terus menciptakan uang dan mengontrol Kredit!” ~ Sir Josiah Stamp (1928-1941), Direktur Bank of England

• ”Sejak saya bertugas disini, saya mulai menyadari ternyata pemerintah tidak berkuasa atas masalah finansial! Mereka memang tidak di rencanakan untuk berkuasa, pekerjaan sebenarnya mereka adalah melindungi dan menutupi Kekuatan Kaya” ~ William Gladstone (1852), Perdana Mentri Inggris

• ”Penyedot Darah ini adalah penyebab berbagai penderitaan di Eropa selama abad ini dan mengumpulkan kekayaan yang amat besar lewat rekayasa perang antar negara yang sebenarnya tak perlu terjadi. Setiap kali ada keributan di Eropa, rumor bahwa akan terjadi perang akan membawa kecemasan dan ketakutan warga, Anda bisa yakin bahwa Rothschild selalu ada di baliknya!!” ~ 1891, Pemimpin Partai Buruh Inggris

Akhir Abad 19, akibat berita2 miring tentang keluarga Rothschild, mereka lalu membeli agensi Media terbesar Reuters untuk meng-counter berita2 buruk tentang kejahatan mereka.

• ”Inggris adalah budak dari kekuatan Finansial Internasional” ~ David Lloyd (20 Januari 1934)

• ”Pendirian sebuah Bank Sentral adalah 90% dari usaha mengomuniskan sebuah negara” ~ Lenin, pada masa setelah peristiwa Bolshevik yang berakhir dengan terbunuhnya Tsar Nicholas II di Rusia

• ”Dari pimpinan illuminati, Weishaupt, hingga Karl Marx, juga Trotsky, konspirasi dunia ini sudah berkembang dengan mantap. Sekarang akhirnya orang2 luar biasa ini berhasil menggenggam rambut dari setiap kepala orang Rusia dan menjadi tuan di kekaisaran yang luar biasa tersebut” ~ 1920, Winston Churchill, sosok penting berdarah yahudi, menulis artikel di Illustrated Sunday Herald

• Maria Anna Schicklgruber, nenek dari Hitler, pernah bekerja di Rumah Rothschild. Kata Koehler, “Seorang perempuan pelayan pergi ke Wina dan menjadi pelayan rumah tangga di kediaman Rothschild, dan kakek Hitler yg tidak diketahui secara pasti, ada dirumah tersebut!” ~ Hans Jurgen Koehler, Inside The Gestapo (1940)

Leluhur George W Bush, Prescott Bush adalah Managing Director bank investasi Brown Brothers, Harriman 1920-1940, dengan bantuan perusahaan2 Averell HArriman, Rockefeller, DuPont, JP Morgan & Ford sebagai sumber keuangan utama membantu membiayai Hitler dari tanah Amerika di saat tentara Amerika sedang berperang dengan Jerman lewat cara mendanai naiknya Adolf Hitler ke kursi kekuasaan tahun 1923. 

Perusahaan2 tersebut membiayai secara langsung pasukan khusus Nazi (SS & SA) yg dananya disalurkan melalui berbagai perusahaan Jerman. Prescott melalui perusahaan pelayaran Hamburg-Amerika Steamship, bankir Nazi Fritz Thyssen, Standart Oil Jerman, perusahaan Baja Jerman STeel Trust & IG. Farben memanfaatkan Union Bank Corporation untuk menyalurkan sejumlah besar dana ke Nazi dan mengelola kepentingan mereka. Keuntungan dari investasi di perusahaan Nazi tersebut diterima kembali oleh Prescott dan sekutunya di Wall Street.

Senat AS (1945) menemukan bukti hubungan Union Bank Corporation (Prescott Bush sebagai Anggota Dewan Direktur) bekerja sama sangat erat dengan perusahaan Nazi, German Steel Trust yg memproduksi sebagian besar produk baja Jerman!

Kembali pada masa Perang Sipil, Revolusi Amerika, masa Benjamin Franklin ketika disahkannya undang-undang keuangan Currency Act 1764 ketika pemerintahan Franklin menerbitkan mata uang sendiri yg disebut Colonial Script, ketika itu dengan Currency Act 1764 Inggris melarang jajahannya Amerika mengeluarkan mata uang sendiri dan semua pajak diharuskan untuk dibayarkan dalam koin emas maupun perak….”Perkembangan situasi berbalik 100% dalam jangka satu tahun setelah di tetapkannya undang-undang itu! Masa-masa makmur telah berakhir dan berubah menjadi krisis ekonomi terparah sehingga jalan2 dikoloni itu penuh dengan gangguan. Bank of England (dimana Rothschild mengatur peredaran mata uangnya) telah menolak menerima pembayaran lebih dari 50% dari nilai mata uang Amerika, seperti yang berlaku sesuai undang-undang baru. Dengan kata lain, nilainya anjlok 50%!”

Lahirnya beban pajak oleh kerajaan Inggris yang mempengaruhi timbulnya Revolusi Amerika pada masa perang sipil 1775 banyak tidak di ketahui orang dalangnya adalah Rothschild melalui tekanan para bankirnya pada perekonomian Inggris dengan hilangnya hak mengeluarkan mata uang dari tangan Kerajaan Inggris Sendiri pada saat itu! Bahkan kontrol atas sistem keuangan Amerika berganti selama 8 kali sejak 1764!

Konspirasi penguasaan Amerika oleh para Bankir Yahudi pun telah di ketahui sejak saat Perang Sipil 1775 oleh para elite politik saat itu yang banyak menyebabkan kematian para elite politik yang mati tertembak secara misterius!! Abraham Lincoln salah satunya!

Bukankah John F Kennedy sebelum kematiannya pernah mengatakan adanya sesuatu kekuasaan bayangan yang lebih berbahaya?

Kata-kata bijak Abraham Lincoln, “Pemerintahlah yg seharusnya mencetak dan mengedarkan uang sesuai dengan kemampuan belanja dari pemerintah dan daya beli masyarakat. Dengan mengadopsi prinsip ini, rakyat bisa di bebaskan dari bunga pajak yg sangat memberatkan. Uang akan menjadi pelayan manusia, bukan majikannya!”

”Saya menghadapi dua musuh Besar, pasukan Selatan di depan, dan ‘institusi Finansial’ di ‘belakang’ saya! Dari keduanya, yang ‘dibelakang’ saya itulah yang paling berbahaya!!!” ~ 1865, Abraham Lincoln di depan Kongres

14 April 1865…. Lincoln ditembak di theater Ford dan meninggal keesokan harinya pada tanggal 15 April 1865.

”Siapapun yang mengendalikan pasokan uang akan mengendalikan bisnis dan aktivitas semua orang!” ~ Ucapan Presiden Garfield sebelum kematiannya (juga tertembak secara misterius)

Kerusuhan Pittsburgh hingga Chicago 1877, Revolusi Bolshevik hingga Revolusi Prancis, Perang Dunia I hingga Perang Dunia II, Kericuhan Timur Tengah hingga peristiwa2 besar Asia dari negara-negara besar hingga kecil,…. tak ada yang tersentuh oleh perbuatan sang penguasa Lembaga Keuangan tersebut!

John Perkins dalam salah satu penjelasannya tentang Guetemala, El Savador & Nikaragua… ”Ketika gelombang Reformasi menyapu benua tersebut 1980-an…. para pemerintah baru terpilih menghadap para pakar “Bank Dunia” & “IMF” untuk meminta solusi! Terbujuklah mereka untuk menjalankan SAP (Sharing Profit Ala World Bank), mereka menerapkan standart kaku & tegas, mulai dari “privatisasi perusahaan publik” hingga “pemotongan jasa sosial” (bila di Indonesia seperti pemotongan atau penghilangan subsidi minyak/listrik). Mereka menerima sejumlah “pinjaman” yg “luar biasa besar” untuk mengembangkan proyek “infrastruktur” ‘yg tidak jarang’ “hanya melayani” kelas atas “sambil tetap membebani negara dengan hutang”…… Hasilnya adalah Bencana! Indikator2 Ekonomi melorot lebih dalam. Jutaan orang yg dahulunya anggota kelas menengah kini kehilangan pekerjaan & bergabung dengan orang melarat…….”

Tentang Indonesia John Perkins menulis… ”Tolak ukur perekonomian nasional terbukti tak bisa di percaya. Seperti yg sering terjadi, nilai tukar uang yg cantik, neraca perdagangan yg bagus, inflansi yg rendah, dan angka pertumbuhan GDP Indonesia yg mengesankan, hanya mencerminkan kondisi sebagian kecil penduduk kaya. Sementara sebagian besarnya terpinggirkan dari arus perekonomian yg terukur. Merekalah yg menanggung beban luar biasa”………”Berbagai korporasi besar berkaliber internasional, didukung kebijakan “Bank Dunia” (Dajjal) yg mendorong “privatisasi” dan “keringanan pajak” untuk “perusahaan2 asing”, mempekerjakan sendiri atau melimpahkan proyek ke pabrik2 yg mengupah buruhnya terlalu rendah. Dan seandainya mereka protes, mereka akan dihajar atau dibunuh. Para buruh ini hidup penuh penderitaan agar barang bisa dijual dengan harga rendah di toko “Negara2 Maju”.

1913…. awal Penguasaan Sentral Bank Amerika melalui The Federal Reserve Bank of New York…. para bankir AS menyatakan telah terjadi kekurangan mata uang di AS sehingga pemerintah tidak bisa menerbitkan lagi karena semua cadangan emas telah terpakai. Maka sekelompok orang mendirikan The Federal Reserve Bank dimana Bank ini menjual stok yg dimiliki & dibeli oleh mereka senilai 450 juta dollar melalui lembaga2 :

1. Rothschild Bank of London
2. Rothschild Bank of Berlin
3. Warburg Bank of Hamburg
4. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam (bersama klan Rothschild)
5. Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy
6. Lazard Brothers of Paris
7. CityBank
8. Goldman & Seach of New York
9. Lehman & Brothers, new York
10. Chase Manhattan Bank
11. Kuhn & Loeb Bank

Untuk membayar bunganya, pemerintah AS menciptakan income tax. Jadi, sebenarnya warga negara AS membayar Bunga kepada “Federal Reserve”!

Apa Bedanya dengan Pajak yang di publikasikan dan mass2 Media Indonesia tentang cerita2 Dongeng Pembangunan Jalan??? Siapa Pengawas, siapa yang di awasi? Masyarakat mengawasi Pajak? Jawabannya masyarakat sendiri yang tahu kebohongan2 itu! Lihat, jalan mana yang tidak bolong2 berlubang, dan macet!

IMF & World Bank didirikan di Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, AS, pada 1944. Nama awalnya Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), namun berganti nama tahun 1975. Arsiteknya adalah Harry Dexter White serta John Maynard Keynes, dan pada dasarnya sama dengan NAtional Banking Act (1864) & Federal Reserve Act (1913). Bedanya mereka melakukan pada sekala global melalui sistem kartel perbankan yg berisi bank2 sentral dunia (yg sebenarnya dikuasai swasta bukan pemerintah!), yang secara perlahan mendikte kebijakan kredit dari negara2 anggotanya!

Kekuatan suara IMF pada dasarnya ditangan Federal Reserve (AS) dan Bank of England. 1987, Edmond de Rothschild, mendirikan World Conservation Bank yg dirancang untuk mentransfer hutang dari negara2 dunia ke-3 ke bank tersebut. Sebagai gantinya, negara2 miskin akan memberikan tanah mereka kepada bank tersebut & mereka mengontrol dunia ke-3 yg memiliki 30% luas tanah di planet bumi!

Pada 2001, Joseph E Stiglitz, mantan ketua ekonom World Bank mengakui di depan publik, strategi World Bank adalah untuk : Memperbudak Negara demi keuntungan Para Bankir! Langkah2nya adalah: 

Pertama, “Privatisasi”. Pemimpin Nasional akan di tawarkan 10% “komisi” untuk menjual aset2 Nasional! Uang itu disimpan aman di rekening mereka di Swiss!

Kedua, “Liberalisasi Pasar Modal”. Ia menyebutnya sebagai “Siklus Uang Panas”. Dana dari luar negri harus dibiarkan bebas masuk untuk berspekulasi di “real estate” dan “mata uang”. Saat keadaan tampak menjanjikan, uang ditarik kembali keluar untuk menciptakan “kekacauan ekonomi”. Sehingga negara tersebut akan meminta bantuan ke IMF, & IMF menyaratkan untuk menaikkan suku bunga bank antara 30-80%. Cara seperti ini telah berhasil untuk pembangkrutan (bukan pembangunan) negara2 dunia ke 3 seperti Indonesia… Dimana akhirnya menurunkan nilai properti, menghancurkan produksi industri & mengeringkan tabungan nasional! Pemiskinan Bangsa sehingga hanya menjadi Pengontrak di negeri sendiri dengan Pajak dan pemotongan sana sini sebagai uang kontraknya.

Ketiga, “Penentuan Harga Pasar”. Harga makanan, air & gas dibuat situasi yg menyebabkan kenaikan harga melalui permainan supply & demand yg menyebabkan kerusuhan sosial (seperti tahun 1997 kejatuhan Soeharto sendiri senjata makan tuannya! dan pada masa G30 S PKI 1965 yang dalang penyebab antrian beras tersebut adalah Mafia Barkeley klan Soeharto itu sendiri untuk menciptakan kehancuran sosial & ketidak percayaan pada pemerintah pada masa Soekarno yang menolak keuntungan bagi hasil Caltex dengan Pemerintah dengan membalik 60:40 Indonesia dan Caltex serta alih teknologi dalam masa beberapa tahun yang tidak di sukai para Mafia Pengusaha Minyak Dunia (Rockefeller sang pemiliknya!). Dengan murah & jatuhnya harga aset2 negara sehingga dengan mudah di beli oleh keluarga Penguasa Bisnis Yahudi2 tersebut melalui kaki tangan bisnisnya!

Keempat, “Perdagangan Bebas”. Ini adalah tahap ketika memasuki wilayah dunia ke-3, dengan tetap mengenakan tarif masuk bea tinggi bagi produk agrikultur negara dunia ke-3, justru untuk obat2 bermerk mereka mengenakan harga sangat tinggi yg akan menyebabkan tingkat kematian yg tinggi pada negara2 dunia ke-3, dalam sistem ini negara dunia ke-3 akan kalah telak dan semua asetnya akan terjual melalui jaringan Pengusaha para Bankir. Penjualan utilitas seperti perusahaan Listrik, Komunikasi & Air, & Energi adalah syarat mendapat pinjaman, dengan demikian negara2 tersebut tak lagi berdaya dan potensi masyarakatnya dilemahkan sampai titik terendah dan hanya mampu menjadi budak2 korporasi penanam modal asing!

Cara2 World Bank & IMF inilah yg telah diterapkan pada dunia saat ini, maka tak heran mengapa negara2 penentangnya di sebut Poros Setan oleh George W Bush untuk membuat opini2 publik yg terbalik!

Bila mengurut siapa nama2 dibalik Pengusaha & Penguasa Ekonomi Dunia saat ini, maka dari sanalah kekuasaan itu sebenarnya di atur. Exxon Mobil, Arco & Amoco, Penzoil (Shell), Chevron & Conoco…. 

namanya sebenarnya satu pemilik & penguasa Keuangan Dunia, klan Rockefeller… Rockefeller adalah anak keturunan Rothschild melalui darah keturunan anak perempuannya. Perusahaan Caltex yg pernah menjadi awal penggulingan Soekarno sendiri hanya bermigrasi menjadi satu grup dengan Arco, kini, kita mengenal Freeport yg memiliki & pernah menunjukkan satu kepentingan saat menggulingkan pemerintahan Soekarno yg berganti dengan pemerintahan yg korup, pemerintahan Soeharto…. Lalu, tidak ada lagi kebijakan pemerintah yg sanggup menantang penguasa perusahaan yang berkuasa di negeri Indonesia itu kini melalui bermacam manufaktur kilang minyak, gas, dan berbagai macam perusahaan nasional kini hampir semua diprivatisasi di telan habis Penguasa2 Asing yang tergrup dalam divisi2 Pengusaha2 yg tercatat pada World Bank!

Jadi, siapa yang anda kira penguasa Indonesia kini? SBY? Atau Rockefeller & klan2nya? Lihatlah pada wajah para penguasa Bankir swasta anda sendiri!

“Memberikan pinjaman kepada suatu pemerintahan akan jauh lebih menguntungkan daripada kepada individu. Nilai pinjaman lebih besar & hutangnya dijamin oleh “Pajak” dari “Rakyatnya” ~ 1760, Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Maka ucapan Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777-1836) ….”Saya tidak peduli ‘siapa boneka’ yang akan dipilih menjadi Raja Inggris untuk memimpin kekaisaran yang mataharinya tidak pernah terbenam. Orang yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris mengendalikan kekaisaran Inggris, dan sayalah yang mengontrol suplai uang Inggris!” kini bisa berubah menjadi ….”Saya tidak peduli ‘siapa boneka’ yang akan dipilih menjadi Raja Penguasa Dunia saat ini (presiden Amerika) untuk memimpin kekaisaran yang mataharinya akan terbit dari sini. Orang yang mengontrol suplai uang Dunialah (melalui World Bank & IMF) mengendalikan kekaisaran Dunia, dan keluarga sayalah yang mengontrol suplai uang Dunia!”

Konspirasi BBM

 http://votreesprit.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/konspirasi-bbm/

Puluhan trem-trem listrik yang dibiarkan membangkai begitu saja karena kejahatan konspirasi BBM

Berbicara mengenai perbandingan energi yang diaplikasikan dengan jenis transportasi, terkadang sangat jarang kita temukan pembicaraan mengenai hal ini di forum manapun. Mungkin sebagian besar masyarakat sudah “pasrah” dengan ketergantungannya kepada bahan bakar minyak. Atau mungkin “dipaksa pasrah” oleh pihak-pihak tertentu.

Apa kelebihan mobil modern bertenaga listrik dibanding mobil berbahan bakar minyak? Segalanya. Dari sisi kekuatan, mobil bertenaga listrik bisa melaju dalam kecepatan maksimal 370km/jam yang dibuktikan oleh perusahaan mobil Eliicabuatan Jepang. Daya jelajahnya pun lebih jauh, dalam sekali charge bisa menempuh 480km, dibuktikan dalam uji coba mobil listrik Tesla Model S. Akselarasi mantap, bisa mencapai 100km/jam hanya dalam tempo tidak lebih dari 4 detik oleh mobil Tesla Roadster. Bahkan mungkin yang tertangkap oleh logika anak kecil kelebihannya tidak bising dan ramah lingkungan (polusi bahkan depercaya 1:10 dibanding mobil berbahan bakar minyak). Lagipula saat pengisian tenaga, charge tidak memiliki resiko sebesar pengisian BBM yang berpotensi terjadinya kebakaran.

Mobil listrik sudah banyak bertebaran dipenjuru kota-kota besar di Amerika. Kira-kira di tahun 1897, New York sudah dipenuhi oleh mobil-mobil taxi bertenaga batere, kereta-kereta listrik banyak lalu-lalang diseputaran kota, bahkan proyek-proyek trem-trem dalam kota sebagai moda transportasi idola saat itu terus digenjot sebagai upaya pelayanan transportasi kepada masyarakat kota. Nyaris tidak ada satu pun mobil BBM yang bisa ditemukan saat itu. Bahkan tahun 1899 mobil listrik memecahkan rekor kecepatan yang dicapai kendaraan darat yang mencapai 100km/jam, mobil tersebut dibuat oleh tangan jenius Cammile Jenatzy, seorang pembalap berkebangsaan Belgia.

Melihat dominasi dan kemajuan kendaraan-kendaraan tenaga listrik, rasanya sulit membayangkan bagaimana kendaraan BBM bisa bersaing secara ketat. Bahkan di tahun 1930 trem dan kereta listrik antar kota suda mencapai kecepatan 200km/jam. Dan di era yang sama, para pengguna mobil BBM masih harus berkeringat ketika akan menyalakan tuas mobil, dibandingkan mobil listrik yang sekali tekan tombol sudah menyala. Ditambah asap yang tebal dan suara bising yang dimiliki mobil BBM, semakin menjauhkan ekspektasi masyarakat untuk menggunakan kendaraan BBM sebagai transportasi utama.

Namun perlahan kapitalisme merubah semuanya. Tidak seperti masyarakat sosialis yang tidak diperbolehkan memiliki faktor produksi dalam bentuk apapun, dalam masyarakat liberal khususnya di Amerika, kebebasan dalam persaingan ekonomi adalah hal yang lumrah.

Begitu populernya kendaraan listrik, trem-trem dalam kota amat mudah kita jumpai di kota-kota besar Indonesia seperti Jakarta, Medan dan Surabaya. Mungkin kakek buyut kita yang tinggal di seputaran kota tersebut masih mengingat bagaimana kenyamanan transportasi kota yang tanpa polusi, nyaman dan tentunya bebas macet. Bahkan hingga hari ini di San Francisco masih banyak bertebaran trem-trem listrik yang masih rutin beroperasi 24 jam yang sudah berumur lebih dari 100 tahun, hal ini bisa ditemukan juga dalam salah satu game PS2 Grand Thieft Auto : San Andreas di kota San Fierro (San Francisco). Keawetan tersebut sama sekali langka dan mustahil bisa dialami oleh kendaraan-kendaraan BBM yang paling lama hanya bertahan 20 tahun saja, karena bahan bakar yang digunakan sebetulnya bersifat korosif atau menghancurkan.

Perubahan kondisi transportasi secara signifikan berawal dari munculnya keluarga pebisnis Yahudi, Rockefeller yang merupakan tangan kanan keluarga Rotchschild. Yang awalnya mereka bergerak dalam bisnis perminyakan, kemudian mulai memasuki ranah bisnis transportasi. Dia melakukan dua langkah kebijakan untuk mematikan proyek-proyek kendaraan listrik.

Langkah pertama dengan membeli semua perusahaan provider dan operator-operator trem listrik melalui perusahaan bentukannya, National City Lines. Rockefeller membeli sebagian besar perusahaan transportasi massal di seluruh kota besar Amerika. Dalam rentang 1936 sampai 1950 National City Lines sudah membeli lebih dari 100 perusahaan operator trem di 45 kota besar Amerika termasuk Detroit, Cleveland, New York, Oakland, Phoenix, Los Ageles, Baltimore, St. Louis dan Salt Lake City. Setelah itu National City Lines langsung menggantikan trem-trem yang sangat nyaman dan ramah lingkungan itu dengan bus-bus peminum BBM yang jorok, penuh polusi dan serba menyusahkan. Dan ribuan trem yang masih dalam kondisi bagus ditarik dari peredaran dan langsung dikirim ke tempat penampungan besi tua.

Langkah kedua adalah membiayai perusahaan mobil Ford Motor Company dan General Motor untuk besar-besaran memproduksi mobil-mobil BBM yang dijual dengan harga murah kepada masyarakat, karena dengan besarnya angka penjualan, harga murah pun tidak menjadi masalah dan keuntungan tetap bisa didapat secara maksimal oleh Rockefeller. Dengan sistem penjualan yang mudah dan pemberian kredit secara ringan kepada masyarakat semakin mempermudah pemasaran, ditambah pormosi massif di media-media massa kepunyaan Rockefeller dan bantuan dari mafia pimpinan teman Rockefeller, seorang Yahudi yaitu Meyer Lanski yang menjamin akan melibas siapa saja pihak-pihak yang ingin menentang langkah-langkah Rockefeller.

Langkah-langkah Rockefeller membuktikan bahwa peribahasa sekali dayung dua tiga pulau terlewati memang benar adanya. Dengan menyingkirkan dan membunuh perusahaan operator mobil-mobil dan trem-trem listrik lalu menggantikannya dengan kendaraan BBM produksinya, dia tidak hanya mendapatkan keuntungan dari bisnis mobil semata, namun justru dari bisnis penjualan bahan bakar minyaknya lah dia mengeruk keuntungan jauh lebih besar. Dengan perhitungan kasar penjualan minyak secara global. Produksi minyak dunia rata-rata 100 juta barel perhari. Dengan asumsi biaya produksi per-barrelnya $20 dan dijual dengan harga $40 per-barel, berarti $40×100 juta = $4miliar atau sekitar 40triliun seharinya, itu adalah keuntungan bersih! Jadi silakan hitung berapa kekayaan dinasti Rothschild yang telah ditumpuknya selama puluhan tahun.

Mungkin bagi orang awam, keuntungan penjualan minyak akan dinikmati oleh negara-negara penghasil minyak seperti Arab Saudi, Kuwait, Uni Emirat Arab, Libya dan Indonesia. Namun kenyataannya meskipun ladang produksi minyaknya ada di Arab Saudi dll, namun sebagian besar perusahaan penambang dan pengolah minyaknya dimiliki oleh perusahaan asing, Rockefeller beserta kolega-koleganya. Di Indonesia sendiri, 90% perusahaan minyak yang ada dimiliki oleh perusahaan asing. Maka jangan heran sebagai salah satu negara penghasil minyak, tidak ada sedikitpun jejak keuntungan besar yang diraup oleh negara ini. Sedikitpun dana yang ada belum terkorupsi, dana ini, dana itu yang tidak jelas kemana larinya.

BBM dan Politisi Mafia Berkeley

http://votreesprit.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/bbm-dan-politisi-mafia-berkeley/

Oleh : Muhammad Dahrum, M. Pd*

 

Tidak lama lagi kenaikan harga BBM betul-betul akan terjadi. Hal itu berdasarkan hasil voting pada senin malam (17/6). Jumlah yang pro RAPBN-P 2013 menang telak 338 suara, sedangkan yang kontra 181 suara. Dengan demikian artinya pemerintah bisa dengan leluasa menaikkan harga BBM. Meskipun kebijakan tersebut banyak terjadi penolakan, karena dapat memberikan efek buruk bagi kesejahteraan dengan bertambahnya beban hidup.

Kenaikan harga BBM membuat rakyat akan semakin menderita. Bukan hanya argumen rakyat jelata, ketua DPR Marzuki Ali juga mengatakan. Kenaikan harga BBM akan membuat masyarakat yang tadinya hampir miskin, dengan kenaikan akan menjadi miskin. Republika.co.id. (19/4/2013). Ditengah hidup yang serba sulit ini, baik karena kurangnya penghasilan maupun susahnya mencari pekerjaan. Ternyata ditambah dengan beban berat diatas kepala, berupa biaya hidup makin mahal karena harga melambung tinggi. BBM adalah salah satu komoditi yang berperan penting dalam proses produksi. Keberadaan komoditi yang satu ini sangat urgen untuk menggerakkan roda-roda perekonomian. Mulai dari mahal ongkos produksi sampai naiknya tarif transportasi dan semuanya bermuara pada biaya hidup yang serba tinggi atau inflasi.

Politisi Mafia Berkeley

Walaupun bakal terjadi inflasi, namun solusi yang diberikan pemerintah tetap pada ide semula yaitu menaikkan harga BBM. Seakan sudah tidak ada solusi lain. Daripada APBN bangkrut dalam menanggung beban subsidi katanya. Untuk kebutuhan vital rakyat diangap beban, sementara untuk kesejahteraan para tuan-tuan penguasa tidak pernah hitung-hitungan.

Ada yang mengatakan bahwa kenaikan BBM boleh saja, asalkan uangnya digunakan untuk bangun jalan atau fasilitas lainnya. Hal ini seolah benar, tapi tunggu dulu jangan terlalu cepat mengambil kesimpulan. Bukankah Negeri ini kaya sumber alam yang terbentang dari Aceh hingga Papua? Bukan sekedar cerita penghibur untuk anak sebelum tidur, tapi ini fakta yang tidak bisa dipungkiri adanya. Hampir seluruh SDA Negeri bernama Indonesia dibawah bendera Amerika dan negara lainnya. Itu artinya kita belumlah merdeka. Bidang ekonomi masih terjajah melalui tangan Mafia Berkeley penghianat bangsa.

Jika diteliti lebih jauh ternyata penyebab mahalnya harga minyak adalah karena adanya peraturan, berupa UU migas. Swasta asing diperbolehkan melakukan aktivitas ekplorasi dan ekploitasi. Berupa usaha pada sektor hulu dan juga sektor hilirnya (pengolahan, pengangkutan, penyimpanan dan penjualan).

Hingga saat ini, 40 perusahan asing sudah memegang izin prinsip pendirian stasiun pengisian bahan bakar umum (SPBU). Masing-masing perusahaan memiliki hak mendirikan 20.000 SPBU. Menurut pengamat ekonomi UGM yokyakarta, Revrison Baswir: Itu artinya, sejumlah 800.000 SPBU milik asing akan menguasai Indonesia. Bayangkan nantinya seluruh kebutuhan minyak harus dibeli dari perusahan asing dan asing akan menguasai seluruh produksi Indonesia dari hulu ke hilir, termasuk warung-warung. Makanya SPBU milik Cevron, Shell, Petronas, akan merajalela di Negeri ini. Dari sini terlihat jelas, jika harga BBM dinaikkan, siapa yang dirugikan dan siapa sebaliknya yang diuntungkan. (Suara Pembaruan,18/6). Kontan saja swasta asing mendapat keuntungan besar ketika naiknya harga minyak mentah dunia.

Siapa yang membuat peraturan tersebut? jawabannya tidak lain adalah para politisi yang ada di Senayan. Konon katanya mereka berasal dari berbagai partai politik. Kenapa peraturan itu masih bercokol dan tidak segera dihapus sebagai upaya menghapus penjajahan, katanya Negeri ini anti penjajahan. Tapi kenapa keberadaan UU tersebut masih dipertahankan. Sebenarnya inilah yang menjadi akar persoalan dari carut-marutnya pengelolaan SDA yang dilegalkan.

Para politisi pragmatis tidak segan-segan untuk menjual apa yang bisa dijual, selagi jabatan masih disandang. Termasuk menjual UU demi mendapatkan segepok uang. Tidak mengherankan, akhirnya banyak para politisi yang harus berurusan dengan KPK, bukan satu atau dua dan bukan sekedar politisi yang berstatus anggota biasa.

Politisi Sejati

Keberadaan politisi sejati sangatlah dinantikan. Rakyat sudah lama merindukan kehadirannya, mereka lelah menimang mimpi untuk memiliki pemimpin yang benar-benar abdi. Hanya semata-mata berjuang untuk umat dan Islam. Harus dipahami bahwa politik sesungguhnya tidak melulu soal kekuasaan. Namun, upaya mengurusi urusan umat dengan konsekuesi pertanggungjwaban bukan saja pada orang yang dipimpin, tetapi kepada Allah Swt. Tidaklah mudah bagi seorang muslim sebenarnya untuk mengikrarkan diri sebagai orang yang sanggup memikul amanah politik rakyatnya.

Politisi sejati haruslah ideologis yang melihat seluruh persoalan dari sudut pandang Islam. Karena Islam itu sempurna, maka tidak ada yang alpa termasuk urusan politik. Bagaimana pemecahan permasalahan dalam pandangan Islam haruslah diketahui dan diterapkan tanpa kompromi. Bukan berdasarkan maslahat pada diri maupun kelompoknya, karena yang paling ditakutkan adalah azab Allah. Sesuatu yang sudah dinyatakan bertentangan dengan syariah yang sejatinya adalah perintah untuk dilaksanakan, maka tidak bisa dimusyawarahkan lagi. Sebagaimana kasus liberalisasi barang tambang dan kepemilikan publik lainnya yang sudah jelas dalilnya. Sehingga pihak manapun yang akan melakukan privatisasi, walaupun pemerintah maka harus dihentikan. Inilah sikap politik yang ideologis bersandarkan pada petunjuk aturan Islam, bukan pada yang lainnya. Ketika aturan Islam mengatakan bahwa itu tidak boleh yakinlah akan ada kemaslahatan bagi umat manusia. Bukanlah melihat manfaat sebagai tolak ukur yang sebenarnya sangatlah subjektif.

Politisi sejati haruslah mampu meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat, kesadaran terhadap Islam. Sehingga terbentuk hubungan timbal balik antara rakyat dan penguasa yang saling melengkapi. Penguasa berkewajiban menerapkan aturan Islam dan rakyat juga memiliki kewajiban untuk memperingatkan penguasa agar menerapkan dan tidak melenceng dari aturan tersebut.

Kiranya menjadi pengingat tentang isi pidato Khalifah Abu Bakar ra saat pertama kali diangkat menjadi pemimpin: ‘Saudara-saudara, Aku telah diangkat menjadi pemimpin bukanlah karena aku yang terbaik diantara kalian semuanya, untuk itu jika aku berbuat baik bantulah aku, dan jika aku berbuat salah tegurlah aku. Sifat jujur itu adalah amanah, sedangkan kebohongan itu adalah pengkhianatan. ‘Orang lemah’ diantara kalian aku pandang kuat posisinya di sisiku dan aku akan melindungi hak-haknya. ‘Orang kuat’ diantara kalian aku pandang lemah posisinya di sisiku dan aku akan mengambil hak-hak mereka yang mereka peroleh dengan jalan yang jahat untuk aku kembalikan kepada yang berhak menerimanya. Patuhlah kalian kepadaku selama aku mematuhi Allah dan Rasul-Nya. Jika aku durhaka kepada Allah dan Rasul-Nya maka tidak ada kewajiban bagi kalian untuk mematuhiku’. WalLahu a’lam bi ash-shawab.

*PNS Aceh Barat Daya.
Email: dahrumdahrum@yahoo.co.id

Mantan Karyawan CIA Beberkan Program Mata-mata AS

• http://votreesprit.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/mantan-karyawan-cia-beberkan-program-mata-mata-as/

Edward Snowden

Seorang mantan karyawan yang bekerja untuk CIA telah mengungkapkan dirinya sebagai sumber kebocoran informasi program mata-mata rahasia AS yang memanen dokumen internet dan telepon warga AS dan warga asing, lansir Al Jazeera pada Senin (10/6/2013).

Edward Snowden yang sekarang menjadi seorang karyawan pertahanan kontraktor Booz Allen Hamilto mengatakan bahwa dia membocorkan informasi tentang program Prism untuk melindungi “kebebasan dasar bagi orang-orang di seluruh dunia.

“Saya tidak ingin hidup di dunia di mana segala sesuatu yang saya lakukan dan saya katakan direkam. Saya tidak bersedia untuk mendukung hal itu atau pun hidup di dunia yang seperti itu.”

Dalam sebuah wawancara dengan surat kabar The Guardian, pria berusia 29 tahun itu mengatakan bahwa dia tidak berniat menyembunyikan [pembocoran itu], “karena saya tidak melakukan kesalahan apa pun”, tetapi menyadari bahwa tindakannya telah membuatnya menjadi target bagi lembaga AS.

Snowden membocorkan presentasi tentang sistem pengawasan Prism, yang memungkinkan Badan Keamanan Nasional AS (NSA) dan FBI bisa mengakses langsung ke server perusahaan internet AS seperti Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook dan AOL.

Ini mencakup email, chatting video, pesan singkat dan terlebih juga untuk melacak “tersangka” asing. NSA juga mengumpulkan rekaman telepon dari jutaan warga AS, tetapi bukan percakapan yang aktual.

“Hati nurani saya tidak bisa diam saja mengetahui pemerintah AS menghancurkan privasi, kebebasan internet dan kebebasan mendasar.”

Snowden mengatakan kepada surat kabar The Guardian bahwa dulu dia bekerja di keamanan TI untuk CIA dan pada tahun 2007 dia ditempatkan dengan diplomatik tertutup di Jenewa, Swiss, di mana dia memiliki akses ke berbagai dokumen rahasia.

“Banyak dari apa yang saya lihat di Jenewa benar-benar mengecewakan saya tentang bagaimana fungsi pemerintah saya dan apa dampaknya di dunia,” katanya. “Saya menyadari bahwa saya adalah bagian dari sesuatu yang jauh lebih mendekati kejahatan daripada kebaikan.”

Dia berhenti pada tahun 2009 dan kemudian mulai bekerja untuk Booz Allen Hamilton, kontraktor untuk NSA, di Hawaii. Di sanalah, tiga minggu yang lalu, dia memutuskan untuk membocorkan informasi tentang Prism.

“Saya berharap ini akan menyadarkan penduduk di seluruh dunia mengenai dunia seperti apa yang sebenarnya kita inginkan untuk hidup,” katanya kepada Guardian.

“Saya dengan hati nurani saya tidak bisa membiarkan pemerintah AS menghancurkan privasi, kebebasan internet dan kebebasan mendasar orang-orang di seluruh dunia dengan mesin pengawas raksasa yang diam-diam mereka bangun.”

Booz Allen mengkonfirmasi pada Ahad bahwa Snowden adalah seorang karyawan perusahaan mereka. Perusahaan itu menambahkan bahwa mereka akan bekerja sama dengan segala bentuk penyelidikan.

Snowden berbicara di Hong Kong, di mana dia yakin akan ada upaya yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah AS untuk mengekstradisinya.

Setiap permintaan ekstradisi bisa dihambat jika Snowden dapat menunjukkan kepada otoritas China bahwa dia bisa menghadapi kekerasan, penyiksaan atau perlakuan tidak adil di AS.

Kebocoran ini telah membuka kembali perdebatan mengenai masalah privasi versus tindakan “perlindungan” terhadap serangan, dan membuat NSA meminta Departemen Kehakiman untuk melakukan investigasi kriminal.

Direktur intelijen nasional, James Clapper, telah mengklaim pembocoran rahasia program pengumpulan-intelijen sebagai sesuatu yang sembrono, dan belakangan ini telah mengambil langkah langka deklasifikasi beberapa rincian tentang hal itu untuk menanggapi laporan media tentang teknik kontra-”terorisme” yang dipekerjakan oleh pemerintah AS.

Obama, Clapper dan lain-lain telah mengklaim bahwa program itu telah disahkan oleh Kongres dan tunduk pada pengawasan ketat pengadilan rahasia.

Thomas Drake

Thomas Drake, seorang mantan eksekutif NSA senior yang juga menjadi seorang pembocor atau “pengungkap aib”, mengatakan: “intelijen AS akan melakukan segala yang bisa mereka lakukan untuk mengadili Snowden. Tindakan Snowden begitu ‘wah’, pembangkangan sipil yang luar biasa.”

Dia mengatakan Prism “jauh melampaui setiap mandat hukum, setiap perang melawan ‘terorisme’, atau ancaman apapun. Maksud saya kira-kira apa penyebabnya? Karena mereka mungkin akan memerlukan data-data itu beberapa waktu ke depan.” (banan/arrahmah.com)

 

Tanda-Tanda Kehancuran Yahudi

http://votreesprit.wordpress.com/2012/08/07/tanda-tanda-kehancuran-yahudi/

• 97 Komentar

TAHUN ini, penjajahan Israel atas bumi Palestina memasuki tahun ke-63. Sebuah catatan yang panjang sekali. Selama dalam kurun waktu tersebut, sekarang ini, hampir 80% wilayah Palestina sudah berhasil dikuasai oleh para Zionis tersebut. Sehubungan dengan paham Anti-Semit yang merebak, banyak bangsa Yahudi yang “kembali” ke Israel (dalam bahasa Ibrani disebut dengan istilah aliyaa).

Paham Anti-Semit terjadi sedemikian rupa di luar perkiraan Israel sendiri. Isyu Holocaust yang selama ini dijadikan pelindung bagi Yahudi, perlahan-lahan mulai surut, dan bahkan banyak masyarakat Eropa sendiri yang tidak percaya kepada Holocaust sebenarnya. 

Di dalam negeri pun, Israel tengah “bertempur”. Para pemimpinnya saling sikut dan berebut kekuasaan. Friksi ini diyakini akan mengakibatkan tersendatnya kesatuan paham di antara mereka sendiri. Di sisi ekonomi, negara-negara yang selama ini memberikan bantuan kepada Israel mulai menuai protes dari rakyatnya untuk menghentikan kebijakan itu. Otomatis, Israel menjadi sedikit limbung. 

Salah satu yang membuat Israel melakukan agresi ke Gaza dua bulan silam salah satunya adalah untuk mencari sumber minyak baru dan air. Sudah beberapa waktu belakangan ini, Israel dilanda kekeringan. Sementara Hamas, sebagai penentang Israel nomor 1, seperti diprediksi banyak orang, malah semakin kuat pasca-agresi ke Gaza.

Beberapa hal ini oleh beberapa pengamat dijadikan sebagai indikasi ambang kehancuran negara Zionis yang ilegal. Uniknya, para analis Israel sendiri tidak menampik kekhawatiran ini. Inilah beberapa indikasi lain kehancuran Israel:

1. Sebagai negara penjajah Israel jelas kehilangan kemampuannya untuk melakukan peleburan dengan bangsa lain di kawasan Timur Tengah. Ini karena Israel hampir tidak beda dengan Barat dan merupakan kepanjangan kepentingan dan politik mereka di Timur Tengah. Misalnya saja dengan Mesir. Walau pada intinya, pemerintah Mesir berkongsi dengan Israel, namun masyarakatnya sendiri jelas-jelas menolak Zionis dalam bentuk apapun.

2. Israel mengalami ketimpangan secara demografi melawan pertumbuhan warga Arab. Hal ini nyata menimbulkan rasialisme terhadap warga Israel dari keturunan Arab dan terhadap warga Palestina. Israel akan berubah, seperti nasib Afrika Selatan pada masa rasialisme Apartheid. Pada akhirnya legalitas Israel akan tercerabut dan mereka akan dimusuhi. Fenomena ini sekarang sudah muncul secara internasional. Meski dukungan terhadap Yahudi di Amerika begitu kuat, mayoritas negara dunia tidak sepakat dalam hal ini. Apalagi jika strategi politik Arab menyerukan solusi satu negara dan bukan dua negara dalam menyelesaikan masalah konflik Palestina Israel.

3. Dunia semakin sadar tentang apa yang terjadi di Timur Tengah. Ini artinya tekanan masyarakat internasional terhadap pemerintah-pemerintahan mereka akan semakin kuat agar memiliki politik tegas terhadap Israel. Di Israel sendiri mulai ada sejumlah organisasi swasta mendukung aksi anti Israel dan melakukan aksi internasional melawan cara-cara Israel menghancurkan rumah warga Palestina dan pengusiran mereka. Dengan berangsurnya kemajuan ekonomi Negara-negara Timur Tengah, perimbangan dan bargaining perdagangan dengan sejumlah Negara akan mulai memaksa negara lain untuk mendukung kepentingan Arab. Secara otomatis Israel akan tercekik. Resesi ekonomi global menjadi jalan pembukanya.

4. Menurunnya jumlah militer Israel sebab jumlah kelompok usia tua militer Israel semakin tinggi. Di samping naiknya jumlah kelompok Yahudi ekstrem “harayadam” yang menolak bergabung dalam militer Israel. Sekarang ini, persentase mereka sudah menapai 9 persen dari warga Israel. Perang yang dilakukan Israel akan menimbulkan kerugian nyawa yang tidak terkira. Sementara bangsa Palestina, seperti yang sudah-sudah dan telah dibuktikan, akan selalu bisa bertahan dalam kondisi seperti ini.

5. Israel mengalami masalah sosial dan politik internal yang krusial. Perpecahan antara Kadima dan Likud akan terus berlanjut. Kadima, sebagai pemenang pemilu 2009 tidak mendapatkan pembagian yang adil dari sisi ekonomi dan kekuasaan. Tawaran dari Benjamin Netanyahu (ketua Likud) ditolak mentah-mentah oleh Tzipi Livni (Kadima). Kondisi ini akan berlangsung lama dan akan menjadi api dalam sekam bagi Israel.

6. Kelas terpelajar sekuler dari Barat mereka eksodus balik. Sehingga di Israel hanya akan tersisa kelompok akstrem dalam politik dan agama. Perseteruan dua kelompok ini sangat panas sebab satu sama lain mengkafirkan.

7. Ekstremis dan fanatisme kelompok di Israel akan saling menghabisi. Ini barangkali yang digambarkan dalam Al-Quran “kalian kira mereka berkumpul tapi hati mereka terpecah.”

DOMINASI YAHUDI MEREDUP DI EROPA, JUGA AMERIKA 

http://cahyono-adi.blogspot.com/2013/07/dominasi-yahudi-meredup-di-eropa-juga.html#more

 

 

Dominasi yahudi jahat penyembah berhala di segala aspek kehidupan manusia niscaya akan membuat orang "tercerahkan" akan menangis berputus asa. Sistem ekonomi dimana kita hidup yang diliputi oleh praktik ribawi, media massa dan hiburan yang kita tonton, hingga para politisi yang kita pilih, semuanya berada di bawah "kendali" mereka.
Namun semua itu ada batasnya. Saat kejatuhan tiba, semua aspek kehidupan akan menjadi musuh para yahudi jahat itu. Sebagaimana digambarkan oleh hadits Rosulullah Muhammad S.A.W yang menyebutkan bahwa suatu saat "batu dan pohon" pun akan memusuhi mereka. Atau dalam hadits lainnya tentang kematian Dajjal (anti-christ) di tangan Nabi Isa (Yesus), yang meleleh seperti lilin terkena api.

Dan tanda-tanda itu sebenarnya sudah tampak bertahun-tahun lalu. Dimulai dari tumbangnya regim Shah Pahlevi pro-zionis oleh gerakan Revolusi Islam Iran tahun 1979, terusirnya Israel dari Lebanon tahun 2000 dan kegagalan mereka menguasai kembali Lebanon tahun 2006, dan kegagalan menumbangkan pemerintahan Syria yang anti-Israel setelah Presiden Barak Obama secara mengejutkan berani menolak tekanan Israel untuk menyerang Syria dan Iran.
Sampai 10 tahun yang lalu orang-orang yahudi itu tidak akan segan untuk membunuh seorang presiden Amerika, sebagaimana mereka lakukan terhadap John F. Kennedy yang menurut Michael Collins Piper dalam bukunya Final Judgement disebabkan karena Kennedy menghalangi program nuklir Israel, atau Abraham Lincoln yang dibunuh karena bermaksud menerbitkan uang pemerintah dan meninggalkan uang kertas buatan bankir yahudi, atau terhadap 2 atau 3 presiden lainnya yang tewas dibunuh saat menjabat sebagai presiden Amerika. 

 

Namun dengan sebagian besar rakyat Amerika yang kini sadar bahwa "teori konspirasi" memang benar ada, mereka berfikir seribu kali untuk melakukannya lagi untuk tidak melihat fenomena "Arab Springs" bangkit di Amerika.

Ide tentang "membunuh Barack Obama" sama sekali bukan sekedar halusinasi. Pemilik dan penerbit koran Atlanta Jewish Times berdarah yahudi, Andrew Adler, secara terbuka bahkan menulis tentang ide tersebut di media miliknya. Menurut Adler, Israel seharusnya mengirimkan tim pembunuh Mossad untuk melakukannya. Alih-alih ditangkap dan dijatuhi hukuman mati karena kejahatan yang sangat serius itu, Adler hanya mengundurkan diri dari jabatan di koran miliknya.

Tentang penolakan Obama terhadap tekanan yahudi meski Obama merupakan antek mereka, Mark Glen dalam blognya yang terkenal, The Ugly Truth menyebutnya sebagai "pelacur yang menolak untuk bunuh diri". Obama tidak sendirian, jajaran militer di bawahnya adalah yang paling mengerti bahwa melibatkan di dalam perang di Syria atau terhadap Iran, setelah kegagalan menyakitkan di Afghanistan dan Irak, juga menganggap intervensi militer atas Syria dan Iran merupakan tindakan bunuh diri.

Dan "fenomena" penolakan terhadap dominasi yahudi kini tampak jelas di Eropa setelah beberapa negara menolak dengan tegas praktik jagal hewan cara yahudi  yang disebut "kosher".

Sementara Uni Eropa baru saja mengeluarkan larangan pemberian bantuan terhadap lembaga-lembaga Israel yang beroperasi di wilayah Palestina yang diduduki, Polandia mengeluarkan larangan praktik "kosher" pada tgl 12 Juli lalu.

Polandia bukan negara Eropa pertama yang melarang praktik itu. Norwegia, Swiss, Latvia, Swedia dan Islandia adalah negara Eropa lainnya yang melarang praktik itu. Pada tahun 2011 parlemen Belanda juga melarang praktik itu, meski kemudian dibatalkan oleh Senat.

Namun itu belum semuanya. Uni Eropa juga mengeluarkan aturan kepada negara-negara anggotanya untuk hanya menjalin hubungan dengan Israel berdasar satu kondisi yang tidak menyenangkan Israel, yaitu pengakuan Israel bahwa pendudukan mereka atas wilayah Palestina paska perang tahun 1967 adalah illegal.

Menurut laporan Times of Israel baru-baru ini, PM Israel Benjamin Netanyahu mengatakan bahwa dirinya kini mengalami kesulitan menjalin komunikasi dengan elemen-elemen ekstrem dalam pemerintahan koalisi yang dipimpinnya akibat kebijakan Uni Eropa tersebut. Laporan yang sama juga menyebutkan bahwa menteri Economi dan Perdagangan Naftali Bennett mengatakan, "Uni Eropa telah mentorpedo perundingan (Palestina-Israel) tersebut.

Sementara menteri perumahan Uri Ariel menuduh langkah Uni Eropa akan bisa menimbulkan "kerusakan terhadap proses perundingan Palestina-Israel".

REF:
"Jewish Supremacists on Retreat in Poland and EU"; thetruthseeker.co.uk; 18 Juli 2013

Diposkan oleh cahyono adi di 08.18

PEMBUNUHAN JF KENNEDY... KONON PENUH MISTERI...???>> ..MYSTERIES...OF ..THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK -THE PRESIDENT OF USA ..0N 22 NOV 1963...??? ..WHO PLAY THE GAME OF KILLING THE PRESIDENT...???>> ...IS THERE SOME CONSPIRACY PLAYING THE GAMES....???>> WHY AND WHAT THE MAIN OBJECTIVE...??>> ....... ACCORDING TO THE POLITICIAN EXPERT...THERE IS NO EVENT..OR POLITICICAL TRAGEDY...OR ASSASSINATION..WITHOUT..THE WELL PLANNING...??>> ... SO WHAT WAS ACTUALLY HAPPENED ON THE JFK ASSASSINATION...?? >> ....nearly 20% of Americans suspected Lyndon B. Johnson of being involved in the assassination of Kennedy.[2..>>....Suspicions that Johnson was involved in covering-up facts about the assassination were supported by Parkland Hospital doctor Charles Crenshaw. (Dr. Crenshaw had worked to save Oswald's life at Parkland after he was shot by Jack Ruby, just as Crenshaw had worked to save President Kennedy's life two days earlier.) While treating Oswald, Crenshaw said he received a phone call from the new U.S. president, Lyndon Johnson. Crenshaw gave his account of the phone conversation in his book Trauma Room One: Johnson: "Dr. Crenshaw, how is the accused assassin?" Crenshaw: "Mr. President, he's holding his own at the moment." Johnson: "Would you mind taking a message to the operating surgeon?" Crenshaw: "Dr. Shires is very busy right now, but I will convey your message." Johnson: "Dr. Crenshaw, I want a death-bed confession from the accused assassin. There's a man in the operating room who will take the statement. I will expect full cooperation in this matter." Crenshaw: "Yes, sir." Dr. Crenshaw said that he relayed Johnson's message to Dr. Shires, but that Oswald was in no condition to give any statement.[..>>. ......Jim Marrs, in his book Crossfire, presented the theory that Kennedy was trying to rein in the power of the Federal Reserve, and that forces opposed to such action might have played at least some part in the assassination.[331][332][333] According to Marrs, the issuance of Executive Order 11110 was an effort by Kennedy to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the United States Department of the Treasury by replacing Federal Reserve Notes with Silver Certificates.[332] Actor and author Richard Belzer named the responsible parties in this theory as American "billionaires, power brokers, and bankers ... working in tandem with the CIA and other sympathetic agents of the government."[194]...>>> ....David Wrone's The Zapruder Film (2003) concludes that the shot that killed JFK came from in front of the limousine, and that JFK's throat and back wounds were caused by an in-and-through shot originating from the grassy knoll. Three shots were fired from three different angles, none of them from Lee Harvey Oswald's window at the Texas School Book Depository. Wrone is a professor of history (emeritus) at the University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point. ISBN 0-7006-1291-2....>>........... Based on the "consensus among the witnesses at the scene" and "in particular the three spent cartridges", the Warren Commission determined that "the preponderance of the evidence indicated that three shots were fired".[90] In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded there were four shots, one coming from the direction of the grassy knoll.[3][93].....>>>........ According to some assassination researchers, the grassy knoll was identified by the majority of witnesses as the area from where shots were fired.[33][97] In March 1965, Harold Feldman wrote that there were 121 witnesses to the assassination with 51 indicating that the shots that killed Kennedy came from the area of the grassy knoll.[97] In 1967, Josiah Thompson examined the statements of 64 witnesses and found that 33 of them thought that the shots emanated from the grassy knoll.[98]...>>> ......The presidential limousine makes it's way through the streets of Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. Weeks before the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's assassination this fall, ReelzChannel will take another look at the killing in a docudrama that suggests a Secret Service agent fired one of the bullets that felled Kennedy....>>

Did an FBI agent fire the shot that killed JFK? Killing of Kennedy to be re-examined in cable docudrama

http://www.theprovince.com/news/agent+fire+shot+that+killed+Killing+Kennedy+examined+cable+docudrama/8719114/story.html

The Associated Press July 29, 2013

The presidential limousine makes it's way through the streets of Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. Weeks before the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's assassination this fall, ReelzChannel will take another look at the killing in a docudrama that suggests a Secret Service agent fired one of the bullets that felled Kennedy.

Photograph by: James Altgens , Google Images

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — Weeks before the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's assassination this fall, a TV network will take another look at the killing in a docudrama that suggests a Secret Service agent fired one of the bullets that felled Kennedy.

ReelzChannel's "JFK: The Smoking Gun" is based on the work of retired Australian police Detective Colin McLaren and the book "Mortal Error: The Shot that Killed JFK" by Bonar Menninger.

McLaren spent four years combing through evidence from Kennedy's death on Nov. 22, 1963, in Dallas. He and Menninger also relied on ballistics evidence from an earlier book by Howard Donahue.

The two-hour docudrama airs Nov. 3 in the U.S., Canada and Australia. It suggests that agent George Hickey fired one of the bullets that hit Kennedy. Hickey, who is now dead, was riding in the car behind Kennedy's limo that day.

"What we're saying is that we believe it was a tragic accident in the heat of that moment," McLaren told the Television Critics Association on Sunday.

When Lee Harvey Oswald fired his first shot, McLaren said Hickey responded by trying to fire back on Oswald's position using his Secret Service-issued rifle. But because he was inexperienced with the weapon and the car lurched forward, McLaren said the shot went awry and accidentally hit Kennedy, who was struck in the neck but quite possibly not fatally wounded by Oswald's second shot.

"We don't suggest that he was in any way involved in a conspiracy," McLaren said of Hickey.
The Warren Commission report in the 1960s concluded that Oswald was the lone gunman in officially explaining the assassination.

The program is ReelzChannel's second Kennedy-related offering. In 2011, the cable channel aired "The Kennedys" after History Channel dropped the miniseries amid reports that the real-life Kennedy family was unhappy about the project.

© Copyright (c)

1963: Kennedy shot dead in Dallas

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/22/newsid_2451000/2451143.stm

 

The President of the United States has been assassinated by a gunman in Dallas, Texas. John F Kennedy was hit in the head and throat when three shots were fired at his open-topped car.
The presidential motorcade was travelling through the main business area of the city.
Texas Governor John Connally was also seriously injured when one of the unknown sniper's bullets hit him in the back.
The men were accompanied by their wives, who were both uninjured.
Vice-president Lyndon Johnson - who was following in a different car - has been sworn in as the new US leader.
The presidential party was driving from Dallas airport to the city centre when witnesses said shots were fired from the window of a building overlooking the road.
The president collapsed into Jackie Kennedy's arms, who was heard to cry "Oh no". Seconds later Governor Connally was also hit.
Dallas Times Herald photographer Bob Jackson was in the motorcade close behind the Democrat leader's car and heard the shots as it entered Dealey Plaza.
"As I looked up I saw a rifle being pulled back from a window - it might have been resting on the windowsill - I didn't see a man," he said.
Mr Kennedy's limousine was driven at speed to Parklands Hospital immediately after the shooting.

This is terrible - I cannot find words Senator Mike Mansfield

The president was alive when he was admitted, but died at 1400 local time (1900 GMT) - 35 minutes after being shot. Police and Secret Service agents stormed the School Book Depository building moments after the shots were fired and recovered a rifle with a telescopic sight, said to be the assassination weapon.
The mood of shock in the US was echoed by Senator Mike Mansfield in an emergency forum of the senate.
"This is terrible - I cannot find words," he said. 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/22/newsid_2451000/2451143.stm

In Context

A little under an hour after the shooting, a policeman approached Lee Harvey Oswald, believing he recognised his description. The policeman was shot dead. Oswald was arrested almost immediately under suspicion of murder. Shortly afterwards, he was also charged with the assassination of President Kennedy. The suspect was never tried as he was shot dead himself two days later by nightclub owner Jack Ruby. The Warren Report, commissioned to investigate the president's death, concluded he had been killed by shots fired by Mr Oswald from the School Book Depository building. But conspiracy enthusiasts quickly turned the assassination into one of the most disputed events in modern history, with theories ranging from claims it was an elaborately staged suicide to the driver being the murderer.

Photos: 48th anniversary of JFK assassination

On Nov. 22, it was the 48th anniversary of the date John F. Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas, Texas.

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Photos+48th+anniversary+assassination/5754757/story.html

November 22, 2011

 

President John F. Kennedy greets supporters in Dallas, Texas before his fateful limousine ride.

Photograph by: Houston Chronicle/AP, Google Images

 

 

Jacqueline Kennedy greets spectators in Dallas, Texas before the fateful trip on November 22, 1963.

Photograph by: PNG, Google Images

 

 

The presidential limousine makes it's way through the streets of Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963.

Photograph by: James Altgens, Google Images

 

 

Secret Service agent jumps on to the rear of the presidential limousine as Jacqueline Kennedy climbs from beside her husband in this frame from the famous Zapruder film.

Photograph by: PNG, Google Images

 

Secret Service agent jumps on the back of the open limousine that President John F. Kennedy and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy are riding in through downtown Dallas, Texas, on Nov. 22, 1963.

Photograph by: Justin Newman/AP, Google Images

 

 

Lyndon B. Johnson takes the oath of office aboard Air Force One shortly after the death of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963.

Photograph by: Cecil W. Stoughton, WHPO, Google Images

 

 

Spectators react moments after the assassination of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963.

Photograph by: FRANK CANCELLARE, Google Images

 

 

The casket of assassinated U.S. president John F. Kennedy is loaded on a plane.

Photograph by: CECIL STOUGHTON, Google Images

 

Jacqueline Kennedy with family members and children at funeral of John F. Kennedy.

Photograph by: Keystone via Getty Images, Google Images

 

Lee Harvey Oswald is arrested in The Texas Theater for the murder of Patrolman J. D. Tippit.

Photograph by: Stuart Reed, Google Images

1963: 'I was injured by Kennedy killer'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/witness/november/22/newsid_3223000/3223926.stm

President Kennedy was hit by at least two bullets

Click below to see a graphic showing the assassination scene  Enlarge Image

James Tague's evidence was crucial to the Warren Commission's findings

A chip of debris from this section of kerb hit Mr Tague in the fac

 

Dallas car salesman James Tague was late for a lunch date when he was caught in traffic in Dealey Plaza on 22 November 1963. Seconds after the 27-year-old got out of his car, two shots were fired into the presidential limousine. A third bullet hit the kerb near Mr Tague, exploding debris into his face. His evidence was ignored, but his eventual testimony to the Warren Commission proved at least one shot missed President Kennedy.
The traffic in front of me was stopped and I got out of my car to see what was going on.
I thought maybe there'd been an automobile accident or something.

	With those last two shots I felt something sting me in the face

I was standing there at the east edge of the triple underpass and noticed a big crowd around the Schoolbook Depository.
About that time the president's limousine turned the corner. I noticed the two flags and it dawned on me I had read in the paper a few days before that the president was in town.
So I stood there for a moment and then heard the pop of what I thought was a firecracker - but was actually the first shot.
I looked up into the crowd and wondered what kind of fool would let off a firecracker with the president coming by. Then I heard the crack of a couple of rifle shots.
And with those last two shots I felt something sting me in the face.
Sobbing man
I felt in danger and ducked back behind the concrete in the triple underpass.
I stayed there for a couple of seconds and there were no more sounds so I walked out, standing there trying to figure out what had happened.
A guy came running up to me in a suit and asked me what had happened and I said, "I don't know." I later learnt it was a deputy-sheriff named Buddy Walthers.
We'd noticed a motorcycle policeman over by the grassy knoll and so we walked over there just in time to here a man sobbing to the policeman, "His head exploded! His head exploded!"
Blood
The policeman said, "Whose head?"
And the man answered, "The president's."
I remember the deputy-sheriff turned to the grass right beside the sidewalk and kicked the grass with his toes as hard as he could and said, "Damn, damn, damn!"
As we were talking the deputy-sheriff looked at my face and said, "You've got blood on your face."
I reached up and on the palm of my hand there were two or three drops of blood. I remembered then that something had stung me during the shooting.

	I learnt later that other people had seen debris fly up as the bullet hit the kerb

He asked me were I was standing and I told him. So we walked back over there and waited for the traffic to clear before we crossed the street and Buddy Walthers said, "Look! What's that mark on the kerb?"
You could see it through three lanes of traffic.
We went over there, looked at the mark and eyeballed where it might have come from. It came from the direction of the Schoolbook Depository.
I learnt later that other people had seen debris fly up as the bullet hit the kerb.
Prime suspect
I went onto Dallas police station and they sent me to Homicide. I sat there for 30 or 40 minutes. A detective named Gus Rose came in and started taking my statement.
We were about through with giving the statement when there was a commotion. A couple of policemen brought a guy in handcuffs in.
Detective Rose asked, "Who is that guy?"
And a policeman said, "This is the man who killed a policeman over in Oak Cliff section of Dallas."
That night on TV they showed Oswald and that was they same guy they'd brought in.
Cover-up
He passed within three feet of me. There were glassed-in cubicles and they put him in the cubicle right next to me. I could have touched him if the glass hadn't been there.
I do not know why the FBI tried to cover up the missed shot. The only thing I can think of was that Hoover [the head of the FBI] in his report to President Johnson a few days after the assassination said the first shot hit Kennedy, the second hit Connally and the third hit Kennedy in the head.
If you go back and talk to some of the old FBI agents they will tell you that you didn't question Hoover. If he said something, that was it.
If you look at the Zapruder film when Kennedy is hit in the head there's a slight move forwards and then a violent move backwards. His head moves so violently back it throws his shoulders into his seat.
And of course you see his head does explode.

	We will never know the truth about the Kennedy assassination

He could have been hit simultaneously by two shots, one from the front and one from the rear. There's definitely one from the rear because there was over 40 fragments of bullet in the frontal part of the head.
When Malcolm Killduff, the assistant White House press secretary announced to the public at Parklands [Hospital] the president had died, he pointed to his right temple as a point of entry for a bullet.
And the doctors at Parklands all testified the back of the President's head had blown out, but the Warren Commission ignored that for some reason. I do not know why.
I don't know the answers - this is one of the reasons I wrote my book. We will never know the truth about the Kennedy assassination.

National Geographic casts Rob Lowe as JFK in film 'Killing Kennedy'

http://www.theprovince.com/entertainment/movie-guide/National+Geographic+casts+Lowe+film+Killing/8446280/story.html

The Associated Press May 28, 2013

This April 25, 2012 file photo shows actor Rob Lowe posing for a portrait in New York. Lowe will will portray President John F. Kennedy in a National Geographic film about the former president's 1963 assassination. The National Geographic Channel said Tuesday, May 28, 2013, that filming for “Killing Kennedy” would begin next month in Richmond, Va. The film is expected to air around the 50th anniversary of the shooting later this year and is based on the book by Bill O'Reilly. (AP Photo/Amy Sussman, file)

NEW YORK, N.Y. - Rob Lowe will portray President John F. Kennedy in a National Geographic film about the former president's 1963 assassination.
The National Geographic Channel said Tuesday that filming for "Killing Kennedy" would begin next month in Richmond, Va. The film is expected to air around the 50th anniversary of the shooting later this year and is based on the book by Bill O'Reilly.
National Geographic already had a hit earlier this year with an adaptation of another of the Fox News Channel anchor's books, "Killing Lincoln."
In addition to Lowe, the movie will feature Ginnifer Goodwin as the first lady and Michelle Trachtenberg as Marina Oswald.

© Copyright (c)

John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

  

President John F. Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy, Nellie Connally, and Governor John Connally, moments before the assassination.

The circumstances surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963 spawned suspicions of a conspiracy. These suspicions were mitigated somewhat when an official investigation by the Warren Commission concluded the following year that there was no conspiracy. Since then, doubts have arisen regarding the Commission's finding that Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible for the assassination of Kennedy, and most Americans today believe that others besides Oswald were also involved in the assassination.^[1] Critics have argued that the Commission and the government have covered up crucial information pointing to a conspiracy.

Subsequent official investigations confirmed most of the conclusions of the Warren Commission. However, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded that Kennedy was probably assassinated as the result of a conspiracy, with "...a high probability that two gunmen fired at [the] President."^[2][3] No person or organization was identified by the HSCA as being a co-conspirator of Oswald. Most current theories put forth a criminal conspiracy involving parties as varied as the CIA, the mafia, anti-Castro Cuban exile groups, the military industrial complex, sitting Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, Cuban President Fidel Castro, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, the KGB, or some combination of those entities.

Contents

• 1 Background
  • 1.1 Public opinion
• 2 Possible evidence of a cover-up
• 3 Allegations of witness tampering, intimidation, and foul play
  • 3.1 Witness intimidation
  • 3.2 Witness deaths
• 4 Allegations of evidence suppression, tampering, and fabrication
  • 4.1 Suppression of evidence
    • 4.1.1 Ignored testimony
    • 4.1.2 Confiscated film and photographs
    • 4.1.3 Withheld documents
  • 4.2 Tampering of evidence
    • 4.2.1 The "backyard" photos
    • 4.2.2 The Zapruder film
    • 4.2.3 Kennedy's body
  • 4.3 Fabrication of evidence
    • 4.3.1 Murder weapon
    • 4.3.2 Bullets and cartridges
• 5 Allegations of multiple gunmen
  • 5.1 Number of shots
  • 5.2 Origin of the shots
    • 5.2.1 Testimony of eyewitnesses
    • 5.2.2 Physical evidence
    • 5.2.3 Film and photographic evidence
    • 5.2.4 Acoustical evidence
    • 5.2.5 Medical evidence
  • 5.3 Oswald's marksmanship
  • 5.4 Role of Oswald
  • 5.5 Alternative gunmen
  • 5.6 Three tramps
• 6 Allegations of other conspirators
  • 6.1 E. Howard Hunt
  • 6.2 J. D. Tippit
  • 6.3 Bernard Weissman
  • 6.4 Roscoe White
  • 6.5 Unnamed accomplice or accomplices in the murder of J. D. Tippit
    • 6.5.1 Allegations regarding witness testimony and physical evidence
    • 6.5.2 Allegations regarding timeline
• 7 Conspiracy theories
  • 7.1 New Orleans conspiracy
  • 7.2 CIA conspiracy
  • 7.3 Shadow government conspiracy
  • 7.4 Military-industrial complex
  • 7.5 Secret Service conspiracy
  • 7.6 Cuban exiles
  • 7.7 Organized crime conspiracy
  • 7.8 Lyndon B. Johnson conspiracy
  • 7.9 Cuban conspiracy
  • 7.10 Soviet conspiracy
  • 7.11 Decoy hearse and wound alteration
  • 7.12 Federal Reserve conspiracy
  • 7.13 Israeli conspiracy
• 8 Other published theories
• 9 See also
• 10 Notes
• 11 References
• 12 External links

Background

Handbill circulated on November 21, 1963, one day before the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by gunfire as he traveled in a motorcade in an open-top limousine in Dallas, Texas on Friday, November 22, 1963 (12:30 pm, CST); Texas Governor John Connally was wounded during the shooting, but survived. Within two hours, Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested for the murder of Dallas policeman J.D. Tippit and arraigned that evening. Shortly after 1:30 am, Saturday, Oswald was arraigned for murdering President Kennedy as well.^[4][5] On Sunday, November 24, at 11:21 am, nightclub owner Jack Ruby shot and killed Oswald as he was being transferred to the county jail.
Immediately after the shooting, many people suspected that the assassination was part of a larger plot.^[6] Ruby's shooting of Oswald compounded initial suspicions.^[6] Among conspiracy theorists, Mark Lane has been described as writing "the first literary shot" with his article, "Defense Brief for Oswald," in the December 19, 1963 edition of the National Guardian.^[7][8] Thomas Buchanan's Who Killed Kennedy?, published in May 1964, has been credited as the first book alleging a conspiracy.^[9]
In 1964, the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald acted alone and that no credible evidence supported the contention that he was involved in a conspiracy to assassinate the president.^[10] The Commission also indicated that Dean Rusk, the Secretary of State; Robert S. McNamara, the Secretary of Defense; C. Douglas Dillon, the Secretary of the Treasury; Robert F. Kennedy, the Attorney General; J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the FBI; John A. McCone, the Director of the CIA; and James J. Rowley, the Chief of the Secret Service, each independently reached the same conclusion on the basis of information available to them.^[11]
In 1979, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) agreed with the Warren Commission that Oswald assassinated Kennedy, but concluded that the Commission's report and the original FBI investigation were seriously flawed. The HSCA concluded that at least four shots were fired with a "high probability" that two gunmen fired at the President, and that a conspiracy was probable.^[3] The HSCA stated that "the Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President."^[2]
The Ramsey Clark Panel and the Rockefeller Commission both supported the Warren Commission's conclusions, while New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison unsuccessfully prosecuted Clay Shaw for conspiring to assassinate Kennedy.

Public opinion

According to John McAdams: “The greatest and grandest of all conspiracy theories is the Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory.”^[12] Others have frequently referred to it as "the mother of all conspiracies".^[13][14] The number of books written about the assassination of Kennedy has been estimated to be in the range of one thousand^[15][16] to two thousand.^[6] According to Vincent Bugliosi, 95% of those books are "pro-conspiracy and anti-Warren Commission".^[15]
Kennedy assassination enthusiasts have been described as belonging to "conspiracy theorists" on one side and "debunkers" on the other.^[12] The great amount of controversy surrounding the event has led to bitter disputes between those who support the conclusion of the Warren Commission and those who reject it or are critical of the official explanation with each side leveling toward the other accusations of "naivete, cynicism, and selective interpretation of the evidence".^[14]
Public opinion polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans believe there was a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. However, on the question of a government cover-up, different polls show both a minority and majority of Americans who believe the government engaged in one.^[17] These same polls also show that there is no agreement on who else may have been involved. A 2003 Gallup poll reported that 75% of Americans do not believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.^[18] That same year an ABC News poll found that 70% of respondents suspected that the assassination involved more than one person.^[19] A 2004 Fox News poll found that 66% of Americans thought there had been a conspiracy while 74% thought there had been a cover-up.^[20]

Possible evidence of a cover-up

Numerous researchers, including Mark Lane,^[21] Henry Hurt,^[22] Michael L. Kurtz,^[23] Gerald D. McKnight,^[24] Anthony Summers,^[25] and others have pointed out what they characterize as inconsistencies, oversights, exclusions of evidence, errors, changing stories, or changes made to witness testimony in the official Warren Commission investigation, which they say could suggest a cover-up.
Michael Benson wrote that the Warren Commission received only information supplied to it by the FBI, and that its purpose was to rubber stamp the lone gunman theory.^[26]
Richard Schweiker, United States senator and member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told author Anthony Summers in 1978, "I believe that the Warren Commission was set up at the time to feed pabulum to the American public for reasons not yet known, and that one of the biggest cover-ups in the history of our country occurred at that time.^[27]
James H. Fetzer took issue with a 1998 statement from Federal Judge John R. Tunheim, the Chair of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), who stated that no "smoking guns" indicating a conspiracy or cover-up were discovered during their efforts in the early 1990s to declassify documents related to the assassination. Fetzer identified 16 "smoking guns" which he claims prove the official narrative is impossible, and therefore a conspiracy and cover-up occurred. He claims that evidence released by the ARRB substantiates these concerns. These include problems with bullet trajectories, the murder weapon, the ammunition used, inconsistencies between the Warren Commission's account and the autopsy findings, inconsistencies between the autopsy findings and what was reported by witnesses at the scene of the murder, eyewitness accounts that conflict with x-rays taken of the President's body, indications that the diagrams and photos of the President's brain in the National Archives are not the President's, testimony by those who took and processed the autopsy photos that the photos were altered, created, or destroyed, indications that the Zapruder film had been tampered with, allegations that the Warren Commission's version of events conflicts with news reports from the scene of the murder, an alleged change to the motorcade route which facilitated the assassination, an alleged lax Secret Service and local law enforcement security, and statements by people who claim that they had knowledge of, or participated in, a conspiracy to kill the President.^[28]

Allegations of witness tampering, intimidation, and foul play

Witness intimidation

Richard Buyer wrote that many witnesses whose statements pointed to a conspiracy were either ignored or intimidated by the Warren Commission.^[29] In JFK: The Last Dissenting Witness, a 1992 biography of Jean Hill, Bill Sloan wrote that Arlen Specter, assistant counsel for the Warren Commission, attempted to humiliate, discredit, and intimidate Jean Hill into changing her story. Jean Hill also told Sloan that she was abused by Secret Service agents, harassed by the FBI, and was the recipient of death threats.^[30] A later book by Sloan, JFK: Breaking the Silence, quotes several assassination eyewitnesses as saying that Warren Commission interviewers repeatedly cut short or stifled any comments casting doubt on the conclusion that Oswald acted alone. An updated version of Sloan's book, retitled The Kennedy Conspiracy: 12 Startling Revelations About the JFK Assassination, was published as an e-book in 2012. It includes the only comprehensive interview ever conducted with the late Ed Hoffman, a deaf-mute eyewitness. Through a sign-language interpreter, Hoffman tells of seeing gunmen behind the wooden fence in Dealey Plaza as Kennedy's motorcade passed by.
In his book Crossfire, Jim Marrs gave accounts of several people who said they were intimidated by FBI agents, or intimidated by anonymous individuals, into altering or suppressing what they knew about the assassination, including Richard Carr, Acquilla Clemmons, Sandy Speaker, and A. J. Millican.^[31] Marrs also wrote that Texas School Book Depository employee Joe Molina "...was intimidated by authorities and lost his job soon after the assassination,"^[32] and that witness Ed Hoffman was warned by an FBI agent that he "might get killed" if he revealed what he had observed in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination.^[33]

Witness deaths

Allegations of mysterious or suspicious deaths of witnesses connected with the Kennedy assassination originated with Penn Jones, Jr.^[34][35][36] and were brought to national attention by the 1973 film Executive Action.^[34][35] Jim Marrs later presented a list of 103 people he believed died "convenient deaths" under suspect circumstances. He noted that the deaths were grouped around investigations conducted by the Warren Commission, New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the House Select Committee on Assassinations.^[37] Marrs pointed out that "these deaths certainly would have been convenient for anyone not wishing the truth of the JFK assassination to become public."^[38]
Vincent Bugliosi has described the death of journalist Dorothy Kilgallen—who claimed she was granted a private interview with Jack Ruby—as "perhaps the most prominent mysterious death" cited by assassination researchers.^[39] According to author Jerome Kroth, Mafia figures Sam Giancana, John Roselli, Carlos Prio, Jimmy Hoffa, Charles Nicoletti, Leo Moceri, Richard Cain, Salvatore Granello, and Dave Yaras were likely murdered to prevent them from revealing their knowledge.^[40] According to author Matthew Smith, others with some tie to the case who have died suspicious deaths include Lee Bowers, Gary Underhill, William Sullivan, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, George de Mohrenschildt, four showgirls who worked for Jack Ruby, and Ruby himself.^[41]
The House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated another alleged "mysterious death"—that of Rose Cheramie.^[42] The Committee reported that Louisiana State Police Lieutenant Francis Fruge traveled to Eunice, Louisiana on November 20, 1963—two days before the assassination—to pick up Rose Cherami, who had sustained minor injuries after she was hit by a car.^[43][44] Fruge drove Cherami to the hospital and said that on the way there, she "...related to [him] that she was coming from Florida to Dallas with two men who were Italians or resembled Italians." Fruge asked her what she planned to do in Dallas, to which she replied: "...number one, pick up some money, pick up [my] baby, and ... kill Kennedy."^[44] Cherami was admitted and treated at State Hospital in Jackson, Louisiana for alcohol and heroin addiction. State Hospital physician, Dr. Victor Weiss later told a House Select Committee investigator that on November 25—three days after the assassination—one of his fellow physicians told him "...that the patient, Rose Cherami, stated before the assassination that President Kennedy was going to be killed."^[45] Dr. Weiss further reported that Cherami told him after the assassination that she had worked for Jack Ruby and that her knowledge of the assassination originated from "word in the underworld."^[44] After the assassination, Lt. Fruge contacted Dallas Police Captain Will Fritz regarding what he had learned from Cherami, but Captain Fritz told him he "wasn't interested".^[46] Cherami was found dead by a highway near Big Sandy, Texas on September 4, 1965; she had been run over by a car.^[47]
Another "suspicious death" cited by Jim Marrs was that of Joseph Milteer, director of the Dixie Klan of Georgia. Milteer was secretly tape-recorded thirteen days before the assassination telling Miami police informant William Somersett that the murder of Kennedy was "in the working." Milteer died in 1974 when a heater exploded in his house.^[48][49][50] The House Select Committee on Assassinations reported in 1979 that Milteer's information on the threat to the President "was furnished [to] the agents making the advance arrangements before the visit of the President" to Miami, but that "the Milteer threat was ignored by Secret Service personnel in planning the trip to Dallas." Robert Bouck, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Secret Service's Protective Research Section, "...testified to the committee that threat information was transmitted from one region of the country to another if there was specific evidence it was relevant to the receiving region."^[51]
The House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the allegation "that a statistically improbable number of individuals with some direct or peripheral association with the Kennedy assassination died as a result of that assassination, thereby raising the specter of conspiracy".^[34] The committee's chief of research testified: "Our final conclusion on the issue is that the available evidence does not establish anything about the nature of these deaths which would indicate that the deaths were in some manner, either direct or peripheral, caused by the assassination of President Kennedy or by any aspect of the subsequent investigation."^[34]
According to author Gerald Posner, Marrs' list was taken from a group of about 10,000 people who were connected only in the most tenuous way to the assassination. Posner claims that it would be surprising if a hundred people out of ten thousand did not die in "unnatural ways" and says that over half of the people on Marrs' list did not die mysteriously, but of natural causes.^[52]

Allegations of evidence suppression, tampering, and fabrication

According to Bugliosi, allegations that the evidence against Oswald was planted, forged, or tampered with is a main argument among those who believe a conspiracy took place.^[53]

Suppression of evidence

Ignored testimony

Some assassination researchers assert that witness statements indicating a conspiracy were ignored by the Warren Commission. In 1967, Josiah Thompson stated that the Commission ignored the testimony of seven witnesses who saw gunsmoke in the area of the stockade fence on the grassy knoll, as well as an eighth witness who smelled gunpowder at the time of the assassination.^[54] In 1989, Jim Marrs wrote that the Commission failed to ask for the testimony of witnesses on the triple overpass whose statements pointed to a shooter on the grassy knoll.^[32]

Confiscated film and photographs

Other researchers reported that witnesses who captured the assassination in photographs or on film had their cameras and/or film confiscated by police or other authorities. Author Jim Marrs and documentary producer Nigel Turner presented the account of Gordon Arnold who said that his film of the motorcade was taken by two policemen shortly after the assassination.^[33][55] Another witness, Beverly Oliver, came forward in 1970 and said she was the "Babushka Lady" who is seen, in the Zapruder film, filming the motorcade. She said that after the assassination she was contacted at work by two men who she thought "...were either FBI or Secret Service agents." According to Oliver, the men told her that they wanted to develop her film and would return it to her within ten days, but they never returned the film.^[56][55]

Withheld documents

Richard Buyer and others have complained that many documents pertaining to the assassination have been withheld over the years, including documents from the Warren Commission investigation, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigation, and the Church Committee investigation.^[29] These documents at one time included the President's autopsy records. Some documents are still not scheduled for release until 2029. Many documents were released during the mid-to-late 1990s by the Assassination Records Review Board under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. However, some of the material released contains redacted sections. Tax return information, which would identify employers and sources of income, has not yet been released.^[57]
The existence of large numbers of secret documents related to the assassination, and the long period of secrecy, suggests to some the possibility of a cover-up. One historian noted, "There exists widespread suspicion about the government's disposition of the Kennedy assassination records stemming from the beliefs that Federal officials (1) have not made available all Government assassination records (even to the Warren Commission, Church Committee, House Assassination Committee) and (2) have heavily redacted the records released under FOIA in order to cover up sinister conspiracies."^[58] According to the Assassination Records Review Board, "All Warren Commission records, except those records that contain tax return information, are (now) available to the public with only minor redactions."^[59] In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by journalist Jefferson Morley, the CIA stated that it had approximately 1,100 JFK assassination-related documents, about 2,000 pages in total, that have not been released for reasons of national security.^[60]

Tampering of evidence

Some researchers have alleged that various items of physical evidence have been tampered with, including: the "single bullet", also known as the "magic bullet" by critics of the official explanations; various bullet cartridges and fragments; the limousine's windshield; the paper bag in which the Warren Commission said Oswald hid the rifle; the so-called "backyard" photos which depict Oswald holding the rifle; the Zapruder film; the photographs and radiographs obtained at Kennedy's autopsy; and Kennedy's body itself.^[61]

The "backyard" photos

Among the evidence against Oswald are the photographs of Oswald posing in his backyard with a Carcano rifle—the weapon identified by the Warren Commission as the assassination weapon. Some researchers, including Robert Groden, assert that these photos are fake.^[62] However, the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that the photographs of Oswald are genuine^[63] and Oswald's wife, Marina says that she took them.^[64]

The Zapruder film

The House Select Committee on Assassinations described the Zapruder film as "the best available photographic evidence of the number and timing of the shots that struck the occupants of the Presidential limousine."^[65] The Assassination Records Review Board said it "is perhaps the single most important assassination record."^[66] According to Vincent Bugliosi, the film was "originally touted by the vast majority of conspiracy theorists as incontrovertible proof of [a] conspiracy" but is now believed by many assassination researchers to be a "sophisticated forgery".^[67] Among those who believe the Zapruder film has been altered are John Costello,^[67] James H. Fetzer,^[67] David Lifton,^[67] David Mantik,^[67] Jack White,^[67] Noel Twyman,^[68] and Harrison Livingstone, who has called it "the biggest hoax of the twentieth century".^[67] In 1996 Roland Zavada, a former product engineer for Kodak, was requested by the Assassination Records Review Board to undertake a thorough technical study of the Zapruder Film.^[69] Zavada concluded that there was no detectable evidence of manipulation or image alteration on the Zapruder in-camera original.^[70]
David Lifton wrote that the Zapruder film was in the possession of the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center, the night of the assassination.^[71][72] Jack White, researcher and photographic consultant to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, claimed that there are anomalies in the Zapruder film, including an "unnatural jerkiness of movement or change of focus ... in certain frame sequences."^[73]

Kennedy's body

In his 1981 book Best Evidence, David Lifton presented the thesis that President Kennedy’s body (i.e., the "best evidence") had been altered between the Dallas hospital and the autopsy site at Bethesda for the purposes of creating erroneous conclusions about the number and direction of the shots.^[74]

Fabrication of evidence

Murder weapon

The Warren Commission found that the shots which killed Kennedy and wounded Connally were fired from the Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5-millimeter Italian rifle owned by Oswald.^[75] Deputy Sheriff Eugene Boone and Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman both initially identified the rifle found in the Texas School Book Depository as a 7.65 Mauser. Weitzman signed an affidavit the following day describing the weapon as a "7.65 Mauser bolt action equipped with a 4/18 scope, a thick leather brownish-black sling on it".^[76][77] Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig claimed that he saw "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the barrel of the weapon.^[78]
Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade told the press that the weapon found in the Book Depository was a 7.65 Mauser, and this was reported by the media.^[79] But investigators later identified the rifle as a 6.5 Italian Mannlicher Carcano.^{[80] [81]} According to Mark Lane:

The strongest element in the case against Lee Harvey Oswald was the Warren Commission's conclusion that his rifle had been found on the 6th floor of the Book Depository building. Yet Oswald never owned a 7.65 Mauser. When the FBI later reported that Oswald had purchased only a 6.5 Italian Mannlicher-Carcano, the weapon at police headquarters in Dallas miraculously changed its size, its make and its nationality. The Warren Commission concluded that a 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano, not a 7.65 German Mauser, had been discovered by the Dallas deputies.^[82]

In Matrix for Assassination, author Richard Gilbride suggested that both weapons were involved and that Dallas Police Captain Will Fritz and Lieutenant J. Carl Day might have been conspirators.^[83]
Addressing "speculation and rumors", the Commission identified Weitzman as "the original source of the speculation that the rifle was a Mauser" and stated that "[p]olice laboratory technicians subsequently arrived and correctly identified the weapon as a 6.5 Italian rifle."^[84]

Bullets and cartridges

The Warren Commission determined that three bullets were fired at Kennedy. One of the three bullets missed the vehicle entirely; another bullet hit Kennedy, passed through his body and then struck Governor John Connally; and the third bullet was the fatal head shot to the President. Some claim that the bullet that passed through President Kennedy’s body before striking Governor Connally—dubbed by critics of the Commission as the "magic bullet"—was missing too little mass to account for the total weight of bullet fragments later found by the doctors who operated on Connally. Those making this claim included Connally’s chief surgeon, Dr. Robert Shaw,^[85] as well as two of the Kennedy autopsy surgeons, Commander James Humes,^[86] and Lt. Colonel Pierre Finck.^[87] However, in the book Six Seconds in Dallas, author Josiah Thompson took issue with this claim. Thompson added up the weight of the bullet fragments listed in the doctor reports and concluded that their total weight "could" have been less than the mass missing from the bullet.^[88]
With Connally's death in 1993, forensic pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht and the Assassination Archives and Research Center petitioned Attorney General Janet Reno to recover the remaining bullet fragments from Connally's body, contending that the fragments would disprove the Warren Commission's single-bullet, single-gunman conclusion. The Justice Department replied that it "...would have no legal authority to recover the fragments unless Connally's family gave [it] permission." Connally's family refused permission.^[89]

Allegations of multiple gunmen

Dealey Plaza in 2003.

The Warren Commission concluded that "three shots were fired [from the Texas School Book Depository] in a time period ranging from approximately 4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds."^[90] Some assassination researchers, including Anthony Summers, dispute the Commission's findings. They point to evidence that brings into question the number of shots fired, the origin of the shots, and the ability of Oswald to accurately fire three shots in a short amount of time. These researchers suggest the involvement of multiple gunmen.^[91]

Governor Connally, seated in the limousine's jump seat directly in front of Kennedy, testified before the Warren Commission that "...the thought immediately passed through my mind that there were either two or three people involved, or more, in this—or someone was shooting with an automatic rifle."^[92]

Number of shots

Based on the "consensus among the witnesses at the scene" and "in particular the three spent cartridges", the Warren Commission determined that "the preponderance of the evidence indicated that three shots were fired".^[90] In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded there were four shots, one coming from the direction of the grassy knoll.^[3][93]
The Warren Commission, and later the House Select Committee on Assassinations, concluded that one of the shots hit President Kennedy in "the back of his neck", exited his throat, continued on to strike Governor Connally in the back, exited Connally's chest, shattered his right wrist, and embedded itself in his left thigh.^[94] This conclusion came to be known as the "single bullet theory".

Mary Moorman said in a TV interview immediately after the assassination that there were three or four shots close together, that shots were still being fired after she took her photograph of the President being hit, and that she was in the line of fire.^[95] In 1967, Josiah Thompson concluded that four shots were fired in Dealey Plaza, with one wounding Connally and three hitting Kennedy.^[54]

Origin of the shots

The wooden fence on the grassy knoll.

The Warren Commission concluded that all of the shots fired at President Kennedy originated from the sixth-floor window at the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository. The Commission based its conclusion on the "cumulative evidence of eyewitnesses, firearms and ballistic experts and medical authorities," including onsite testing, as well as analysis of films and photographs conducted by the FBI and Secret Service.^[90]

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations agreed to publish a report from Warren Commission critic Robert Groden, in which he named "nearly [two] dozen suspected firing points in Dealey Plaza".^[96] These sites included multiple locations in or on the roof of the Texas School Book Depository, the Dal-Tex Building, and the Dallas County Records Building, as well as the railroad overpass, a storm drain located along the north curb of Elm street, and various spots near the "grassy knoll".^[96] Josiah Thompson concluded that the shots fired on the motorcade came from three locations: the Texas School Book Depository, the area of the grassy knoll, and the Dal-Tex Building.^[54]

Testimony of eyewitnesses

According to some assassination researchers, the grassy knoll was identified by the majority of witnesses as the area from where shots were fired.^[33][97] In March 1965, Harold Feldman wrote that there were 121 witnesses to the assassination with 51 indicating that the shots that killed Kennedy came from the area of the grassy knoll.^[97] In 1967, Josiah Thompson examined the statements of 64 witnesses and found that 33 of them thought that the shots emanated from the grassy knoll.^[98]

In 1966, Esquire magazine credited Feldman with "advanc[ing] the theory that there were two assassins: one on the grassy knoll and one in the Book Depository."^[99] Jim Marrs also wrote that the weight of evidence suggested shots came from both the grassy knoll and the Texas School Book Depository.^[33]
Lee Bowers operated a railroad tower that overlooked the parking lot on the north side of the grassy knoll. He reported that he saw two men behind the picket fence at the top of the grassy knoll before the shooting. The men did not appear to be acting together and did not appear to be doing anything suspicious. After the shooting, Bowers said that one of the men remained behind the fence. Bowers said that he lost track of the second man whose clothing blended into the foliage. When interviewed by Mark Lane, Bowers noted that he saw something that attracted his attention, either a flash of light, or maybe smoke, from the knoll, leading him to believe "something out of the ordinary" had occurred there. Bowers told Lane he heard three shots, the last two in quick succession. Bowers opined that they could not have come from the same rifle.^[100]
William and Gayle Newman were standing at the curb on the north side of Elm St. with their two children. Mr. Newman said that the shot to Kennedy's head was fired from behind him (from the knoll).
Jesse Price was the building engineer for the Terminal Annex Building, located across from the Texas School Book Depository on the opposite side of Dealey Plaza. Price viewed the presidential motorcade from the Terminal Annex Building's roof. In an interview with Mark Lane, Price said that he believed the shots came from "just behind the picket fence where it joins the underpass."^[101] He claimed to have seen a "...man run towards the passenger cars on the railroad siding after the volley of shots."^[102]

Physical evidence

Several conspiracy theories posit that at least one shooter was located in the Dal-Tex Building, which is located across the street from the Texas School Book Depository.^[103] According to L. Fletcher Prouty, the physical location of James Tague when he was injured by a bullet fragment is not consistent with the trajectory of a missed shot from the Texas School Book Depository, leading Prouty to theorize that Tague was instead wounded by a missed shot from the second floor of the Dal-Tex Building.^[104]
Some assassination researchers claim that FBI photographs of the presidential limousine show a bullet hole in its windshield above the rear-view mirror, and a crack in the windshield itself. When Robert Groden, author of The Killing of a President, asked for an explanation, the FBI responded that what Groden thought was a bullet hole "occurred prior to Dallas".^[105][106]

Film and photographic evidence

Film and photographic evidence of the assassination have led viewers to different conclusions regarding the origin of the shots. In the Zapruder film, the President's head and upper torso move backwards after the last, fatal shot—an indication to many that a bullet was fired from the front. However, close inspection of frames 312 and 313 show Kennedy's head moving forward by as much as 1.9  inches, before his head moves backwards.^[107] Researchers, including Robert Groden and Cyril Wecht, state that the film is evidence of a "double hit" to Kennedy's head.^[108][109] Wecht believes that the film depicts the President's head being "struck twice in a synchronized fashion, from the rear and the right front side."^[109] Paul Chambers argues that Frame Z313 shows multiple jets of blood, bone and brain matter exiting just above Kennedy's right ear and claims this is consistent with a high velocity (approx. 4,000 ft/sec) rifle rather than the medium velocity (2,000 ft/sec) Mannlicher-Carcano.^[110] Chambers also claims that analysis of the Zapruder film at normal speed shows the President's limousine comes to a complete stop moments before the final fatal head shot.^[111]

Acoustical evidence

According to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, a Dictabelt recording of the Dallas Police Department radio dispatch transmissions from November 22, 1963 was analyzed to "resolve questions concerning the number, timing, and origin of the shots fired in Dealey Plaza".^[112] The Committee concluded that the source of the recording was from an open microphone on the motorcycle of H.B. McLain escorting the motorcade^[113] and that "the scientific acoustical evidence established a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."^[114]

The acoustical analysis firm hired by the Committee recommended that the Committee conduct an acoustical reconstruction of the assassination in Dealey Plaza to determine if any of the six impulse patterns on the dispatch tape were fired from the Texas School Book Depository or the grassy knoll. The reconstruction would entail firing from two locations in Dealey Plaza—the depository and the knoll—at particular target locations and recording the sounds through numerous microphones. The purpose was to determine if the sequences of impulses recorded during the reconstruction would match any of those on the dispatch tape. If so, it would be possible to determine if the impulse patterns on the dispatch tape were caused by shots fired during the assassination from shooter locations in the depository and on the knoll.^[115]
In 1978, at the behest of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, members of the Dallas Police Pistol Team participated in an acoustical reconstruction by firing both rifles and pistols from the locations selected by the researchers. During the acoustical reconstruction, the Dallas Police marksmen had no difficulty hitting the targets. The House Select Committee's firearms experts "...testified that given the distance and angle from the sixth floor window to the location of the President's limousine, it would have been easier to use the open iron sights." The Warren Commission tests had been carried out on the assumption that Oswald, who they and the Committee concluded fired the shots, used the telescopic sight.^[115]
An article which appeared in Science & Justice, a quarterly publication of Britain's Forensic Science Society, found there was a 96% certainty, based on analysis of audio recordings made during the assassination, that a shot was fired from "the grassy knoll" in front of and to the right of the President's limousine.^[116][117]

Medical evidence

Some assassination researchers have pointed to testimony or medical evidence suggesting that at least one of the shots fired at President Kennedy came from a location other than the Book Depository.^[118][119] Roy Kellerman, the Secret Service agent seated next to the driver in the presidential limousine, testified that he saw a 5-inch-diameter (130 mm) hole in the back right-hand side of the President's head.^[120] Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who sheltered the President with his body on the way to the hospital, said: "The right rear portion of his head was missing."^[121] Later, in a National Geographic Channel documentary, Hill described the wound as a "gaping hole above his right ear, about the size of my palm."^[122]
Robert McClelland, one of the Parkland Hospital doctors who attended to Kennedy, testified to the Warren Commission that the back right part of Kennedy's head was blown out, with posterior cerebral tissue and some cerebellar tissue missing.^[123][124]
Some critics skeptical of the official "single bullet theory" state that the trajectory of the bullet, which hit Kennedy above the right shoulder blade and passed through his neck (according to the autopsy), would have had to change course to pass through Connally's rib cage and wrist.^{[125][126][page needed]} Kennedy's death certificate, signed by his personal physician Dr. George Burkley, locates the bullet at the third thoracic vertebra—which some claim is too low to have exited his throat.^[127][128] Moreover, the bullet was traveling downward, since the shooter was in a sixth floor window. The autopsy descriptive sheet displays a diagram of Kennedy's body with the same low placement at the third thoracic vertebra.^[129] The hole in back of Kennedy's shirt and jacket are also claimed to support a wound too low to be consistent with the "single bullet theory".^{[130][better source needed][131][132][better source needed]}
On the day of the assassination, Nellie Connally was seated in the presidential car next to her husband, Governor John Connally. In her book From Love Field: Our Final Hours, Nellie Connally said that she believed that her husband was hit by a bullet that was separate from the two that hit Kennedy.^[133]
There is conflicting testimony about the autopsy performed on Kennedy's body, particularly as to when the examination of his brain took place, who was present, and whether or not the photos submitted as evidence are the same as those taken during the examination.^[134] Douglas Horne, the Assassination Record Review Board's chief analyst for military records, said he was "90 to 95% certain" that the photographs in the National Archives are not of President Kennedy's brain. Supporting Horne was Dr. Gary Aguilar who stated: "According to Horne’s findings, the second brain—which showed an exit wound in the front—allegedly replaced Kennedy's real brain—which revealed much greater damage to the rear, consistent with an exit wound and thus evidence of a shot from the front."^[135]
Paul O'Connor, a laboratory technologist who assisted in the autopsy of President Kennedy, claimed that the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital was conducted in obedience to a high command.^[136][137]
In his book JFK and the Unspeakable, James Douglass cites Dr. Pierre Finck’s testimony at the trial of Clay Shaw as evidence that Finck was "...a reluctant witness to the military control over the doctors' examination of the president's body".^[138][139]

Oswald's marksmanship

The Warren Commission examined the capabilities of the Carcano rifle and ammunition, as well as Oswald's military training and post-military experience, and determined that Oswald had the ability to fire three shots within a time span of 4.8 to 5.6 seconds.^[140] According to their report, an army specialist using Oswald's rifle was able to duplicate the feat and even improved on the time. The report also states that the Army Infantry Weapons Evaluation Branch test fired Oswald's rifle 47 times and found that it was "quite accurate", comparing it to the accuracy of an M-14 rifle. Also contained in the Commission report is testimony by Marine Corps Major Eugene Anderson confirming that Oswald's military records show that he qualified as "sharpshooter" in 1956. But this is confronted with more detailed record of his shooting abilities. According to official Marine Corps records Oswald was tested in shooting, scoring 212 in December 1956 (slightly above the minimum for qualification as a sharpshooter - the intermediate category), but in May 1959 scoring only 191 (barely earning the lower designation of marksman - the lowest category of skilled shooter, but still above undesignated shooters). He never approached the highest marksmanship category in the Marine Corps - the Expert. Conspiracy theorists such as Walt Brown and authors such as Richard H. Popkin contend that Oswald was a notoriously poor shot, his rifle was inaccurate, and that no one has ever been able to duplicate his ability to fire three shots within the time frame given by the Warren Commission.^[141][142] FBI marksman Robert Frazier who tested the rifle in two sets of tests testified to the Warren Commission that he could not reach the 5.6 second mark for firing three shots and all his shots fired five inches high and five inches to the right due to an uncorrectable deficiency in the telescopic sight.^[143]

Role of Oswald

Assassination researchers differ as to the role of Oswald in the assassination of President Kennedy. Some researchers believe that Oswald was an uninvolved patsy, while others believe he was actively involved in a plot. Oswald's ability to move to Russia, then return as an avowed communist to the United States with help from the State Department – who gave him a repatriation loan of $435.71^[144][145] – has led some theorists to speculate that he was working for the CIA and/or the FBI.^{[146][147][148]}
Oswald contacted the FBI twice in 1963. The first occasion was on August 9 when Oswald was arrested in New Orleans for disturbing the peace. After his arrest, Oswald asked to speak with an FBI agent. Agent John Quigley arrived and spent over an hour talking to Oswald.^[149][150] Also, Oswald visited the Dallas FBI office in November 1963, about 2 to 3 weeks before the assassination, and attempted to deliver a note to Special Agent James Hosty.^{[151][152][153]}
Jim and Elsie Wilcott, former husband and wife employees of the Tokyo CIA station, told the San Francisco Chronicle in 1978: "It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.... Right after the President was killed, people in the Tokyo station were talking openly about Oswald having gone to Russia for the CIA. Everyone was wondering how the agency was going to be able to keep the lid on Oswald. But I guess they did."^[154]
Marguerite Oswald [Lee Oswald's mother] "...frequently expressed the opinion that her son was recruited by an agency of the U.S. Government and sent to Russia in 1959."^[155]
New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison, who in 1967 brought Clay Shaw to trial for the assassination of President Kennedy, stated in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy, "[Oswald] was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency and was obviously drawn into a scapegoat situation and made to believe ultimately that he was penetrating the assassination. And then when the time came, they took the scapegoat—the man who thought he was working for the United States government—and killed him real quick. And then the machinery, disinformation machinery, started turning and they started making a villain out of a man who genuinely was probably a hero."^[156]
James Botelho, a former roommate of Oswald who would later become a California judge, stated in an interview with Mark Lane, "Oswald, it was said, was the only Marine ever to defect from his country to another country, a Communist country, during peacetime.... When the Marine Corps and American intelligence decided not to probe the reasons for the 'defection', I knew then what I know now: Oswald was on an assignment in Russia for American intelligence."^[157][158]
Senator Richard Schweiker, who was a member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, stated: "We do know Oswald had intelligence connections. Everywhere you look with him, there're fingerprints of intelligence."^[159] Richard Sprague, interim staff director and chief counsel to the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, said, "If he had it to do over again, he would begin his investigation of the Kennedy assassination by probing Oswald's ties to the Central Intelligence Agency."^[160] In 2003, Robert Blakey, staff director and chief counsel for the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, stated: "I no longer believe that we were able to conduct an appropriate investigation of the [Central Intelligence] Agency and its relationship to Oswald."^[161]
According to Richard Buyer, Oswald never fired a shot at the President.^[162] James W. Douglass described Oswald as "a questioning, dissenting CIA operative who had become a security risk" and "the ideal scapegoat".^[163] According to Josiah Thompson, Oswald was in the Texas School Book Depository during the assassination, but it is "quite likely" he was not the shooter on the sixth floor.^[54]
In a 2013 interview with CBS journalist Charlie Rose, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said that his father Robert F. Kennedy was "fairly convinced" that others besides Oswald were involved in the assassination.^[164]

Alternative gunmen

In addition to Oswald, Jerome Kroth has named 26 people as "Possible Assassins In Dealey Plaza".^[165] They include: Orlando Bosch^[165], James Files^[166][165], Desmond Fitzgerald^[165], Charles Harrelson^[167][165], Gerry Hemming^[165], Chauncey Holt^[165], Howard Hunt^[165], Charles Nicoletti^[167][165], Charles Rogers^[165], Johnny Roselli^[165], Lucien Sarti^[167][165], and Frank Sturgis^[165].
Vincent Bugliosi provides a "partial list of assassins...whom one or more conspiracy theorists have actually named and identified as having fired a weapon at Kennedy" on pages 1495-1498 of "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy".

Three tramps

Main article: Three tramps

The three tramps are three men photographed by several Dallas-area newspapers under police escort near the Texas School Book Depository shortly after the assassination. Since the mid-1960s, various allegations have been made about the identities of the men and their involvement in a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. Records released by the Dallas Police Department in 1989 identified the men as Gus Abrams, Harold Doyle, and John Gedney.^[168]

Allegations of other conspirators

E. Howard Hunt

Main article: E Howard Hunt#JFK conspiracy allegations

The theory that former CIA agent and Watergate burglar, E. Howard Hunt, was a participant in the assassination of Kennedy garnered much publicity from 1978 to 2000.^[169] In 1981, he won a libel judgment against Liberty Lobby's paper The Spotlight who in 1978 printed an allegation by Victor Marchetti suggesting Hunt's involvement in a conspiracy; the libel award was thrown out on appeal and the newspaper was successfully defended by Mark Lane in a second trial.^[170] Former KGB archivist Vasili Mitrokhin indicated in 1999 that Hunt was made part of a fabricated conspiracy theory disseminated by a Soviet "active measures" program designed to discredit the CIA and the United States.^[171][172] After his death in 2007, an audio-taped "deathbed confession" in which Hunt claimed knowledge of a conspiracy was released by his sons;^[173] the authenticity of the confession was met with some skepticism.^{[clarification needed][169][174][175]}
In 2012, journalist Jefferson Morley reported that "...the JFK Assassination Records Collection at the National Archives contains 366 pages of CIA documents on Howard Hunt that have never been made public."^[176]

J. D. Tippit

Dallas Police Officer J. D. Tippit has been named in some conspiracy theories as a renegade CIA operative sent to silence Oswald^[177][178] and as the "badge man" assassin on the grassy knoll.^[178] According to some Warren Commission critics, Oswald was set up to be killed by Tippit, but Tippit was killed by Oswald before he could carry out his assignment.^[179] Other critics doubt that Tippit was killed by Oswald and assert he was shot by other conspirators.^[177][179] (See section below.) Some critics have alleged that Tippit was associated with organized crime or right-wing politics.^[177]

Bernard Weissman

Advertisement in the November 22, 1963, Dallas Morning News, placed by Bernard Weissman and three others.

According to the Warren Commission, the publication of a full page, paid advertisement critical of Kennedy in the November 22, 1963, Dallas Morning News, which was signed by "The American Fact-Finding Committee" and noted Bernard Weissman as its chairman, was investigated to determine whether any members of the group claiming responsibility for it were connected to Oswald or to the assassination.^[180] The Commission stated that "The American Fact-Finding Committee" was a fictitious sponsoring organization and that there was no evidence linking the four men responsible for the genesis of the ad with either Oswald or Ruby, or to a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy.^[180] During the Commission's hearings, Mark Lane testified that an informant whom he refused to name told him that Weismann had met with Tippit and Ruby eight days before the assassination.^[180][a] In Rush to Judgment, Lane disputed the government's findings and indicated that the source of his information was reporter Thayer Waldo of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. ^[182]

Roscoe White

In 1990, Ricky Don White claimed that his father, Roscoe White, was one of three people ordered by the CIA to assassinate Kennedy.^[183] According to the son, Oswald, who was involved in the plot but did not fire any shots, was picked up after the assassination by Roscoe White and J. D. Tippit to be transported to Red Bird Airport.^[183] Ricky White stated that Tippit, who had no knowledge of the assassination or plot, became suspicious after Oswald panicked and got out of the car.^[183] He indicated that his father shot Tippit after Tippit indicated that he would need to take Oswald to police headquarters for questioning.^[183] Jack Shaw, Roscoe White's pastor, said that Roscoe White had spoken to him about the assassination on several occasions and was "killed by a witness elimination team activated after Kennedy's death."^[183] According to Shaw, Roscoe White's wife, Geneva, said to him she had overheard conversations between White and Jack Ruby in which White would "take care of" Kennedy and Tippit and that Ruby would "take care of Oswald".^[183] The allegations were denied as "ludicrous" by a CIA spokesman.^[183] The FBI released a statement indicating that they had investigated the allegations in 1988 and determined that the information was not credible.^[183]

Unnamed accomplice or accomplices in the murder of J. D. Tippit

The Warren Commission concluded that Oswald "...killed Dallas Police Officer J. D. Tippit in an apparent attempt to escape."^[184] The evidence that formed the basis for this conclusion was: "(1) two eyewitnesses who heard the shots and saw the shooting of Dallas Police Patrolman J. D. Tippit and seven eyewitnesses who saw the flight of the gunman with revolver in hand positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man they saw fire the shots or flee from the scene, (2) the cartridge cases found near the scene of the shooting were fired from the revolver in the possession of Oswald at the time of his arrest, to the exclusion of all other weapons, (3) the revolver in Oswald's possession at the time of his arrest was purchased by and belonged to Oswald, and (4) Oswald's jacket was found along the path of flight taken by the gunman as he fled from the scene of the killing."^[185]
Some researchers have alleged that the murder of Officer Tippit was part of a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. Jim Marrs hypothesized that "the slaying of Officer J. D. Tippit may have played some part in [a] scheme to have Oswald killed, perhaps to eliminate co-conspirator Tippit or simply to anger Dallas police and cause itchy trigger fingers."^[186] Researcher James Douglass said that "...the killing of [Tippit] helped motivate the Dallas police to kill an armed Oswald in the Texas Theater, which would have disposed of the scapegoat before he could protest his being framed."^[187] Harold Weisberg offered a simpler explanation: "Immediately, the [flimsy] police case [against Oswald] required a willingness to believe. This was proved by affixing to Oswald the opprobrious epithet of 'cop-killer.'"^[187] Jim Garrison alleged that evidence was altered to frame Oswald, stating: "If Oswald was innocent of the Tippit murder the foundation of the government's case against him collapsed."^[188]
Some critics doubt that Tippit was killed by Oswald and assert he was shot by other conspirators.^[177][179] They allege discrepancies in witness testimony and physical evidence which they feel call into question the Commission's conclusions regarding the murder of Tippit. According to Jim Marrs, Oswald's guilt in the assassination of Kennedy is placed in question by the presence of "a growing body of evidence to suggest that [he] did not kill Tippit".^[189] Others say that multiple men were directly involved in Tippit's killing. Conspiracy researcher Kenn Thomas has alleged that the Warren Commission omitted testimony and evidence that two men shot Tippit and that one left the scene in a car.^[190]
William Alexander—the Dallas assistant district attorney who recommended that Oswald be charged with the Kennedy and Tippit murders—later became skeptical of the Warren Commission's version of the Tippit murder. He stated that the Commission's conclusions on Oswald's movements "don't add up," and that "certainly [Oswald] may have had accomplices."^[191]
According to Brian McKenna's review of Henry Hurt's book, Reasonable Doubt, Hurt reported that "Tippit may have been killed because he impregnated the wife of another man" and that Dallas police officers lied and altered evidence to set up Oswald to save Tippit's reputation.^[192]

Allegations regarding witness testimony and physical evidence

The Warren Commission identified Helen Markham and Domingo Benavides as two witnesses who actually saw the shooting.^[193] Conspiracy theorist Richard Belzer criticized the Commission for, in his description, "relying" on the testimony of Markham whom he described as "imaginative".^[194] Jim Marrs also took issue with Markham's testimony, stating that her "credibility ... was strained to the breaking point".^[189] Joseph Ball, senior counsel to the Commission, referred to Markham's testimony as "full of mistakes," characterizing her as an "utter screwball."^[195] The Warren Commission addressed concerns regarding Markham's reliability as a witness and concluded: "However, even in the absence of Mrs. Markham's testimony, there is ample evidence to identify Oswald as the killer of Tippit."^[193]
Domingo Benavides initially said that he did not think he could identify Tippit's assailant and was never asked to view a police lineup,^[196] even though he was the person closest to the killing.^[197] Benavides later testified that the killer resembled pictures he had seen of Oswald.^[198] Other witnesses were taken to police lineups. However, critics have questioned these lineups in that they consisted of people who looked very different from Oswald.^[197][199]
Additionally, witnesses who did not appear before the Commission identified an assailant who was not Oswald. Acquilla Clemons saw two men near Tippit’s car just before the shooting.^[156] After the shooting, she ran outside of her house and saw a man with a gun whom she described as "kind of heavy." He waved to the second man, urging him to "go on."^[200] Frank Wright emerged from his home and observed the scene seconds after the shooting. He described a man standing by Tippit’s body who had on a long coat and who ran to a parked car and drove away.^[201][202]
Critics have questioned whether the cartridge cases recovered from the scene were the same as those that were subsequently entered into evidence. Two of the cases were recovered by witness Domingo Benavides and turned over to police officer J.M. Poe. Poe told the FBI that he marked the shells with his own initials, "J.M.P." to identify them.^[203] Sergeant Gerald Hill later testified to the Warren Commission that it was he who had ordered police officer Poe to mark the shells.^[204] However, Poe's initials were not found on the shells produced by the FBI six months later.^{[203][205][206]} Testifying before the Warren Commission, Poe said that although he recalled marking the cases, he "couldn’t swear to it."^[205][207] The identification of the cases at the crime scene raises more questions. Sergeant Gerald Hill examined one of the shells and radioed the police dispatcher, saying: "The shell at the scene indicates that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 rather than a pistol."^[208] However, Oswald was reportedly arrested carrying a non-automatic .38 Special revolver.^[201][209]

Allegations regarding timeline

The Warren Commission investigated Oswald's movements between the time of the assassination and the shooting of Tippit, to ascertain whether Oswald might have had an accomplice who helped him flee the Book Depository. The Commission concluded "...through the testimony of seven witnesses [that] Oswald was always alone."^[210] According to their final report, Oswald was seen by his housekeeper leaving his rooming house shortly after 1:00 pm and had enough time to travel nine-tenths of a mile (1.4 km) to the scene where Tippit was killed at 1:16 pm.^{[211][212][b]}
Some Warren Commission critics believe that Oswald did not have enough time to get from his house to the scene where Tippit was killed.^[177] The Commission’s own test and estimation of Oswald’s walking speed demonstrated that one of the longer routes to the Tippit shooting scene took 17 minutes and 45 seconds to walk.^[214] No witness ever surfaced who saw Oswald walk from his rooming house to the murder scene.^[215]
Conspiracy researchers Anthony Summers and Robert Groden believe that Tippit's murder may have occurred earlier than the time given in the Warren Report.^[216][217] They note that the Commission established the time of the shooting as 1:16 pm from police tapes that logged Domingo Benavides' use of the radio in Tippit's car.^[213] However, Benavides testified that he did not approach the car until "a few minutes" after the shooting, because he was afraid that the gunman might return.^[218] He was assisted in using the radio by witness T. F. Bowley who testified to Dallas police that at the time he arrived to help, "several people were at the scene," and that the time was 1:10 pm.^[216][219]
Witness Helen Markham initially told the FBI that the shooting occurred "possibly around 1:30 pm,"^[220] but she later told the Warren Commission: "I wouldn't be afraid to bet it wasn't 6 or 7 minutes after 1."^[221][222] In an unpublished manuscript titled When They Kill a President, Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig stated that when he heard the news that Tippit had been shot, he noted that the time was 1:06 pm.^[223] However, in a later statement to the press, Craig seemed confused about the time of the shooting.^[224]
Warren "Butch" Burroughs, who ran the concession stand at the Texas Theater where Oswald was arrested, told author James Douglass in 2007 that Oswald came into the theater between 1:00 and 1:07 pm, which if true would make Oswald's alleged 1:16 pm shooting of Officer J. D. Tippit impossible.^[225] This was a claim that Burroughs had made earlier in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy.^[226]

Conspiracy theories

According to researchers, conspiracy theorists consider four or five groups, alone or in combination, to be the primary suspects in the assassination of Kennedy: the CIA^[227],^[228] the military-industrial complex^[227],^[228] organized crime^[227],^[228][229] the government of Cuba,^[228][229] and Cuban exiles.^[228] Other domestic individuals, groups, or organizations implicated in various conspiracy theories include Lyndon Johnson^[230],^[228][229] George H. W. Bush,^[228][229] Sam Giancana^[230], J. Edgar Hoover,^[229] Earl Warren^[230], the Federal Bureau of Investigation,^[228] the United States Secret Service,^[228][229] the John Birch Society,^[228][229] and far-right wealthy Texans.^[228] Some other alleged foreign conspirators include Fidel Castro^[230], the KGB and Nikita Krushchev^[230],^[228] Aristotle Onassis,^[229] the government of South Vietnam,^[231] and international drug lords^[228] including a French heroin syndicate.^[231]

New Orleans conspiracy

Further information: Trial of Clay Shaw, People involved in the trial of Clay Shaw, and David Ferrie

Soon after the assassination, allegations began to surface of a conspiracy between Oswald and persons with whom he was or may have been acquainted, while living in New Orleans. On November 25, 1963, New Orleans attorney Dean Andrews told the FBI that he received a telephone call three days earlier (the day of the assassination) from a man named Clay Bertrand, asking him to defend Oswald. Andrews would later repeat this claim in testimony to the Warren Commission.^[232]

David Ferrie (second from left) and Lee Harvey Oswald (far right) in a group photo of the New Orleans Civil Air Patrol in 1955 (click to enlarge)

Also, in late November 1963, an employee of New Orleans private investigator Guy Banister named Jack Martin began making accusations of possible involvement in the assassination by fellow Banister employee David Ferrie.^[233] According to witnesses, in 1963 Ferrie and Banister were working for lawyer G. Wray Gill on behalf of Gill's client, New Orleans Mafia boss Carlos Marcello.^[234] Ferrie had also attended Civil Air Patrol meetings in New Orleans in the 1950s that were also attended by a teenage Lee Harvey Oswald.^[235]
In 1966, New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison began an investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy. Garrison's investigation led him to conclude that a group of right-wing extremists, including David Ferrie and Guy Banister, were involved in a conspiracy to kill Kennedy.^[236] Garrison also came to believe that New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw was part of the conspiracy and that Clay Shaw used the pseudonym "Clay Bertrand".^[237] Garrison further believed that Shaw, Banister, and Ferrie conspired to set up Oswald as a patsy in the JFK assassination.^[238] On March 1, 1967, Garrison arrested and charged Shaw with conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy. On January 29, 1969, Clay Shaw was brought to trial on these charges, and the jury found him not guilty.
In 2003, Judyth Vary Baker—whose employment records show that she worked at the Reily Coffee Company in New Orleans at the same time Oswald did—appeared in an episode of Nigel Turner's documentary television series, The Men Who Killed Kennedy.^[239] Baker claimed that in 1963 she was recruited by Dr. Canute Michaelson to work with Dr. Alton Ochsner and Dr. Mary Sherman on a clandestine CIA project to develop a biological weapon that could be used to assassinate Fidel Castro. According to Baker, she and Oswald were hired by Reily in the spring of 1963 as a "cover" for the operation.^[240] Baker further claimed that she and Oswald began an affair, and that later Oswald told her about Merida, Mexico—a city where he suggested they might begin their lives over again.^[239][241] According to John McAdams, Baker presents a "classic case of pushing the limits of plausibility too far."^[122] Others on both sides of the research community have widely dismissed her claims.^[242] However, other researchers, including Jim Marrs and James Fetzer, have concluded the opposite—that Baker's claims are credible.

CIA conspiracy

Main article: CIA Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory

The House Select Committee on Assassinations reported that "[t]here was no indication in Oswald's CIA file that he had ever had contact with the Agency" and concluded that the CIA was not involved in the assassination of Kennedy.^[243]
Gaeton Fonzi, an investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, wrote that investigators were pressured not to look into the relationship between Lee Harvey Oswald and the CIA. He stated that CIA agent David Atlee Phillips, using the pseudonym "Maurice Bishop", was involved with Oswald prior to the Kennedy assassination in connection with anti-Castro Cuban groups.^[244]

In 1995, former U.S. Army Intelligence officer and National Security Agency executive assistant John M. Newman published evidence that both the CIA and FBI deliberately tampered with their files on Lee Harvey Oswald both before and after the assassination. Furthermore, he found that both agencies withheld information that might have alerted authorities in Dallas that Oswald posed a potential threat to the President. Subsequently, Newman expressed a belief that CIA chief of counter-intelligence James Angleton was probably the key figure in the assassination. According to Newman, only Angleton "had the access, the authority, and the diabolically ingenious mind to manage this sophisticated plot." However, Newman surmised that the cover operation was not under James Angleton, but under Allen Dulles (the former CIA director who had been dismissed by Kennedy after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion).^[245]
According to investigative reporter Joseph Trento, among senior government officials, only James Angleton continued to express the belief that Kennedy assassination was not carried out by a lone gunman.^{[246][page needed]}

Shadow government conspiracy

One conspiracy theory suggests that a secret or shadow government including wealthy industrialists and right-wing politicians ordered the assassination of Kennedy.^[247] Peter Dale Scott has indicated that Kennedy's death allowed for policy reversals desired by the secret government to escalate the United States' military involvement in Vietnam.^[248]

Military-industrial complex

Some conspiracy theorists have argued that Kennedy planned to end the involvement of the United States in Vietnam and was therefore targeted by those who had an interest in sustained military conflict, including the Pentagon and defense contractors.^[249]
Former Texas Senator Ralph Yarborough in 1991 stated: "Had Kennedy lived, I think we would have had no Vietnam War, with all of its traumatic and divisive influences in America. I think we would have escaped that."^[250]
According to author James Douglass, Kennedy was assassinated because he was turning away from the Cold War and seeking a negotiated peace with the Soviet Union.^[251] Douglass argued that this "was not the kind of leadership the CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military-industrial complex wanted in the White House."^[252]
In his farewell speech, President Dwight D. Eisenhower had warned, "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted."^[253]
Oliver Stone's 1991 movie JFK explored the possibility that Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy involving the military-industrial complex.^[254] L. Fletcher Prouty, Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Kennedy, and the person who inspired the character "Mr. X" in Stone's movie, wrote that Kennedy's assassination was actually a coup d'état.^[255]

Secret Service conspiracy

The House Select Committee on Assassinations reported that it investigated "alleged Secret Service complicity in the assassination" and concluded that the Secret Service was not involved.^[243] However, the HSCA declared that "the Secret Service was deficient in the performance of its duties."^[256] Among its findings, the HSCA noted: that President Kennedy had not received adequate protection in Dallas; that the Secret Service possessed information that was not properly analyzed, investigated, or used by the Secret Service in connection with the President's trip to Dallas; and finally that the Secret Service agents in the motorcade were inadequately prepared to protect the President from a sniper.^[257] The HSCA specifically noted:

No actions were taken by the agent in the right front seat of the Presidential limousine [ Roy Kellerman ] to cover the President with his body, although it would have been consistent with Secret Service procedure for him to have done so. The primary function of the agent was to remain at all times in close proximity to the President in the event of such emergencies.^[258]

Some argue that the lack of Secret Service protection occurred because Kennedy himself had asked that the Secret Service make itself discreet during the Dallas visit.^[259] However, Vince Palamara, who interviewed several Secret Service agents assigned to the Kennedy detail, disputes this. Palamara reports that Secret Service driver Sam Kinney told him that requests—such as removing the bubble top from the limousine in Dallas, not having agents positioned beside the limousine's rear bumper, and reducing the number of Dallas police motorcycle outriders near the limousine's rear bumper—were not made by Kennedy.^{[260][261][262]}
In The Echo from Dealey Plaza, Abraham Bolden—the first African American on the White House Secret Service detail—claimed to have overheard agents say that they would not protect Kennedy from would-be assassins:

[President Kennedy] alienated Southerners and conservatives around the country, most of whom were already suspicious of him. In this, the Secret Service reflected the more backward elements of America. Many of the agents with whom I worked were products of the South.... I heard some members of the White House detail say that if shots were fired at the president, they'd take no action to protect him. A few agents vowed that they would quit the Secret Service rather than give up their lives for Kennedy.^[263]

Questions regarding the forthrightness of the Secret Service increased in the 1990s when the Assassination Records Review Board—which was created when Congress passed the JFK Records Act—requested access to Secret Service records. The Review Board was told by the Secret Service that in January 1995, in violation of the JFK Records Act, the Secret Service destroyed protective survey reports that covered JFK's trips from September 24 through November 8, 1963.^{[264][265][relevant? – discuss]}

Cuban exiles

The House Select Committee on Assassinations wrote: "The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved".^[243]
With the 1959 Cuban Revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power, thousands of Cubans left their homeland to take up residence in the United States. Many exiles hoped to overthrow Castro and return to Cuba. Their hopes were dashed with the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion in 1961, and many exiles blamed President Kennedy for the failure.^[266]
The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that some militant Cuban exiles might have participated in Kennedy's murder. These exiles worked closely with CIA operatives in violent activities against Castro's Cuba. In 1979, the committee reported:

President Kennedy's popularity among the Cuban exiles had plunged deeply by 1963. Their bitterness is illustrated in a tape recording of a meeting of anti-Castro Cubans and right-wing Americans in the Dallas suburb of Farmer's Branch on October 1, 1963.^[267]

Holding a copy of the September 26 edition of The Dallas Morning News, featuring a front-page account of the President's planned trip to Texas in November, Cuban exile Nestor Castellanos vented his hostility:

CASTELLANOS ...we're waiting for Kennedy the 22d, [the date Kennedy was murdered] buddy. We're going to see him in one way or the other. We're going to give him the works when he gets in Dallas. Mr. good ol' Kennedy. I wouldn't even call him President Kennedy. He stinks.^[267]

Author Joan Didion explored the Miami anti-Castro Cuban theory in her 1987 non-fiction book Miami.^[268][269] She discussed Marita Lorenz' testimony regarding Guillermo Novo, a Cuban exile who was involved in shooting a bazooka at the U.N. building from the East River during a speech by Che Guevara. Allegedly, Novo was affiliated with Lee Harvey Oswald and Frank Sturgis and carried weapons with them to a hotel in Dallas just prior to the assassination. These claims, though put forth to the House Assassinations Committee by Lorenz, were never substantiated by a conclusive investigation.

Organized crime conspiracy

The House Select Committee on Assassinations wrote: "The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved".^[243]
Documents never seen by the Warren Commission have revealed that some Mafiosi worked with the CIA on assassination attempts against Cuban leader Fidel Castro.^[270] CIA documents released in 2007 confirmed that in the summer of 1960, the CIA recruited ex-FBI agent Robert Maheu to approach the West Coast representative of the Chicago mob, Johnny Roselli. When Maheu contacted Roselli, Maheu hid the fact that he was sent by the CIA, instead portraying himself an advocate for international corporations. He offered to pay $150,000 to have Castro killed, but Roselli declined any pay. Roselli introduced Maheu to two men he referred to as "Sam Gold" and "Joe." "Sam Gold" was Sam Giancana; "Joe" was Santo Trafficante, Jr., the Tampa, Florida boss and one of the most powerful mobsters in pre-revolution Cuba.^[271][272] Glenn Kessler of The Washington Post explained: "After Fidel Castro led a revolution that toppled a friendly government in 1959, the CIA was desperate to eliminate him. So the agency sought out a partner equally worried about Castro—the Mafia, which had lucrative investments in Cuban casinos."^[273]
In his memoir, Bound by Honor, Bill Bonanno, son of New York Mafia boss Joseph Bonanno, disclosed that several Mafia families had long-standing ties with the anti-Castro Cubans through the Havana casinos operated by the Mafia before the Cuban Revolution. Many Cuban exiles and Mafia bosses disliked President Kennedy, blaming him for the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion.^[274] They also disliked his brother, the young and idealistic Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who had conducted an unprecedented legal assault on organized crime.^[91][275] This was especially provocative because several Mafia "families" had allegedly worked with JFK's father, Joseph Kennedy, to get JFK elected.^{[citation needed]} Both the Mafia and the anti-Castro Cubans were experts in assassination—the Cubans having been trained by the CIA.^[276] Bonanno reported that he recognized the high degree of involvement of other Mafia families when Jack Ruby killed Oswald, since Bonanno was aware that Ruby was an associate of Chicago mobster Sam Giancana.^[277]
Some conspiracy researchers have alleged a plot involving elements of the Mafia, the CIA and the anti-Castro Cubans, including Anthony Summers who stated: "Sometimes people sort of glaze over about the notion that the Mafia and U.S. intelligence and the anti-Castro activists were involved together in the assassination of President Kennedy. In fact, there's no contradiction there. Those three groups were all in bed together at the time and had been for several years in the fight to topple Fidel Castro."^[278] News reporter Ruben Castaneda wrote in 2012: "Based on the evidence, it is likely that JFK was killed by a coalition of anti-Castro Cubans, the Mob, and elements of the CIA."^[279]
Carlos Marcello allegedly threatened to assassinate the President to short-circuit his younger brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who was leading the administration's anti-Mafia crusade.^[280][281] Information released in 2006 by the FBI has led some to conclude that Carlos Marcello confessed^{[to whom?]} to having organized Kennedy's assassination, and that the FBI covered-up this information which it had in its possession.^{[282][dead link]}
In his book, Contract on America, David Scheim provided evidence that Mafia leaders Carlos Marcello, Santo Trafficante, Jr. and Jimmy Hoffa ordered the assassination of President Kennedy. Scheim cited in particular a 25-fold increase in the number of out-of-state telephone calls from Jack Ruby to associates of these crime bosses in the months before the assassination, and to an attempted confession by Jack Ruby while in prison.^[283] David E. Kaiser has also suggested mob involvement in his book, The Road to Dallas.^[284]
Investigative reporter Jack Anderson concluded that Fidel Castro worked with organized crime figures to arrange the JFK assassination. In his book Peace, War, and Politics, Anderson claimed that Mafia member Johnny Roselli gave him extensive details of the plot. Anderson said that although he was never able to independently confirm Roselli's entire story, many of Roselli's details checked out. Anderson said that Oswald may have played a role in the assassination, but that more than one gunman was involved. Johnny Roselli, as previously noted, had worked with the CIA on assassination attempts against Castro.
The History Channel program, The Men Who Killed Kennedy presented additional evidence for organized crime involvement.^[285] Christian David was a Corsican Mafia member interviewed in prison. He said that he was offered the assassination contract on President Kennedy, but that he did not accept it. However, he said that he knew the men who did accept the contract. According to David, there were three shooters. He provided the name of one—Lucien Sarti. David said that since the other two shooters were still alive, it would break a code of conduct for him to identify them. When asked what the shooters were wearing, David noted their modus operandi was to dress in costumes such as official uniforms. Much of Christian David's testimony was confirmed by former Corsican member Michelle Nicole, who was part of the DEA witness protection program.
The book Ultimate Sacrifice, by Lamar Waldron and Thom Hartman, attempted to synthesize these theories with new evidence. The authors argued that government officials felt obliged to help the assassins cover up the truth because the assassination conspiracy had direct ties to American government plots to assassinate Castro. Outraged at Robert Kennedy's attack on organized crime, mob leaders had President Kennedy killed to remove Robert from power. A government investigation of the plot was thwarted, the authors allege, because it would have revealed embarrassing evidence of American government involvement with organized crime in plots to kill Castro.^[286]

Lyndon B. Johnson conspiracy

A 2003 Gallup poll indicated that nearly 20% of Americans suspected Lyndon B. Johnson of being involved in the assassination of Kennedy.^[287] Critics of the Warren Commission have accused Johnson of plotting the assassination because he hated the Kennedys and feared that he would be dropped from the Democratic ticket for the 1964 election.^[288] With his 1968 book The Dark Side of Lyndon Baines Johnson, Joachim Joesten is credited as being the first conspiracy author to accuse Johnson of having a role in the assassination.^[289] According to Joesten, Johnson "played the leading part" in a conspiracy that involved "the Dallas oligarchy and ... local branches of the CIA, the FBI, and the Secret Service".^[289] Other assassination authors who have indicated there was complicity on the part of Johnson include Jim Marrs,^[289] Ralph D. Thomas,^[289] J. Gary Shaw,^[289] Larry Harris,^[289] Walt Brown,^[289] Noel Twyman,^[289] Barr McClellan,^[289] Craig Zirbel,^[36] Penn Jones, Jr.,^[36] and Madeleine Brown.^[290]

In 2003, researcher Barr McClellan published the book, Blood, Money & Power.^[291] McClellan claims that Johnson, motivated by the fear of being dropped from the Kennedy ticket in 1964 and the need to cover up various scandals, masterminded Kennedy's assassination with the help of his friend, Austin attorney Edward A. Clark. The book suggests that a smudged partial fingerprint from the sniper's nest likely belonged to Johnson's associate Malcolm "Mac" Wallace, and that Mac Wallace was, therefore, on the sixth floor of the Depository at the time of the shooting. The book further claims that the killing of Kennedy was paid for by oil magnates, including Clint Murchison and H. L. Hunt. McClellan states that the assassination of Kennedy allowed the oil depletion allowance to be kept at 27.5 percent. It remained unchanged during the Johnson presidency. According to McClellan, this resulted in a saving of over 100 million dollars to the American oil industry. McClellan's book subsequently became the subject of an episode of Nigel Turner's ongoing documentary television series, The Men Who Killed Kennedy. The episode, entitled "The Guilty Men", drew angry condemnation from the Johnson family, President Johnson's former aides, and ex-Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter following its airing on The History Channel. The History Channel assembled a committee of historians who concluded the accusations in the documentary were without merit, and The History Channel apologized to the Johnson family and agreed not to air the series in the future.^[292]

Madeleine Brown, who alleged she was the mistress of Lyndon Johnson, also implicated Johnson in a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. In 1997, Brown said that Johnson, along with H. L. Hunt, had begun planning Kennedy's demise as early as 1960. Brown claimed that by its fruition in 1963, the conspiracy involved dozens of persons, including the leadership of the FBI and the Mafia, as well as prominent politicians and journalists.^[293] In the documentary The Men Who Killed Kennedy, Madeleine Brown and May Newman (an employee of Texas oilman Clint Murchison) both placed J. Edgar Hoover at a social gathering at Murchison's mansion the night before the assassination.^[294] Also in attendance, according to Brown, were John McCloy, Richard Nixon, George Brown, R. L. Thornton, and H. L. Hunt.^[295] Madeleine Brown claimed that Johnson arrived at the gathering late in the evening and, in a "grating whisper," told her that the "...Kennedys will never embarrass me again—that's no threat—that's a promise."^{[295][296][297][298]} In addition, Brown said that on New Year's Eve 1963, she met Johnson at the Adolphus Hotel in Dallas and that he confirmed the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, insisting that "the fat cats of Texas and [U.S.] intelligence" had been responsible.^[294] Brown reiterated her allegations against Johnson in the 2006 documentary, Evidence of Revision. In the same documentary, several other Johnson associates also voiced their suspicions of Johnson.
Suspicions that Johnson was involved in covering-up facts about the assassination were supported by Parkland Hospital doctor Charles Crenshaw. (Dr. Crenshaw had worked to save Oswald's life at Parkland after he was shot by Jack Ruby, just as Crenshaw had worked to save President Kennedy's life two days earlier.) While treating Oswald, Crenshaw said he received a phone call from the new U.S. president, Lyndon Johnson. Crenshaw gave his account of the phone conversation in his book Trauma Room One:

Johnson: "Dr. Crenshaw, how is the accused assassin?"

Crenshaw: "Mr. President, he's holding his own at the moment."

Johnson: "Would you mind taking a message to the operating surgeon?"

Crenshaw: "Dr. Shires is very busy right now, but I will convey your message."

Johnson: "Dr. Crenshaw, I want a death-bed confession from the accused assassin. There's a man in the operating room who will take the statement. I will expect full cooperation in this matter."

Crenshaw: "Yes, sir."

Dr. Crenshaw said that he relayed Johnson's message to Dr. Shires, but that Oswald was in no condition to give any statement.^[294][299]
Former CIA agent and Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt accused Johnson (along with several CIA agents who he names) of complicity in the assassination in his posthumously released autobiography American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate, and Beyond.^[300] Referencing that section of the book, Tim Weiner of The New York Times and Joseph C. Goulden of the The Washington Times called into question the sincerity of the charges, and William F. Buckley, Jr., who wrote the foreword, said material "was clearly ghostwritten".^{[301][302][303]} Shortly afterwards, an audio-taped "deathbed confession" in which Hunt claimed knowledge of a conspiracy was released by his sons;^[173] the authenticity of the confession was also met with some skepticism.^{[169][174][175]}
Historian Michael L. Kurtz wrote that there is no evidence suggesting that Johnson ordered the assassination of Kennedy.^[304] According to Kurtz, Johnson believed Fidel Castro was responsible for the assassination and that Johnson covered-up the truth because he feared the possibility that retaliatory measures against Cuba might escalate to nuclear war with the Soviet Union.^[304] In 2012, investigative biographer Robert Caro published his fourth volume on Johnson's career, The Passage of Power, which detailed Johnson's communications and actions as vice president, and described the events leading up to the assassination.^[305] Caro wrote that "nothing that I have found in my research" points to involvement by Johnson.^[306]

Cuban conspiracy

The Warren Commission reported that they investigated "dozens of allegations of a conspiratorial contact between Oswald and agents of the Cuban Government" and that they found no evidence that Cuba was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.^[307] The House Select Committee on Assassinations also wrote: "The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy".^[243]
Conspiracy theories frequently implicate Fidel Castro as having ordered the assassination of Kennedy in retaliation for the CIA's previous attempts to assassinate him.^[275]
In the early 1960s, Clare Booth Luce, wife of Time-Life publisher Henry Luce, was one of a number of prominent Americans who sponsored anti-Castro groups. This support included funding exiles in commando speedboat raids against Cuba. In 1975, Clare Luce said that on the night of the assassination, she received a call from a member of a commando group she had sponsored. According to Luce, the caller's name was "something like" Julio Fernandez and he claimed he was calling her from New Orleans.^[308][309]
According to Luce, Fernandez told her that Oswald had approached his group with an offer to help assassinate Castro. Fernandez further claimed that he and his associates eventually found out that Oswald was a communist and supporter of Castro. He said that with this new-found knowledge, his group kept a close watch on Oswald until Oswald suddenly came into money and went to Mexico City and then Dallas.^[310] Finally, according to Luce, Fernandez told her, "There is a Cuban Communist assassination team at large and Oswald was their hired gun."^[311]
Luce said that she told the caller to give his information to the FBI. Subsequently, Luce would reveal the details of the incident to both the Church Committee and the HSCA. Both committees investigated the incident, but were unable to uncover any evidence to corroborate the allegations.^[312]
In May 1967, CIA Director Richard Helms told President Lyndon Johnson that the CIA had tried to assassinate Castro. Helms further stated that the CIA had employed members of the Mafia in this effort, and "...that CIA plots to assassinate Fidel Castro dated back to August of 1960—to the Eisenhower Administration." Helms also said that the plots against Castro continued into the Kennedy Administration and that Attorney General Robert Kennedy had known about both the plots and the Mafia's involvement.^[313]
On separate occasions, Johnson told two prominent television newsmen that he believed that JFK's assassination had been organized by Castro as retaliation for the CIA's efforts to kill Castro. In October 1968, Johnson told veteran newsman Howard K. Smith of ABC that "Kennedy was trying to get to Castro, but Castro got to him first." In September 1969, in an interview with Walter Cronkite of CBS, Johnson said that in regard to the assassination he could not "honestly say that I've ever been completely relieved of the fact that there might have been international connections," and referenced unnamed "others." Finally, in 1971, Johnson told his former speechwriter Leo Janos of Time magazine that he "never believed that Oswald acted alone".^[313]
In 1977, Castro was interviewed by newsman Bill Moyers. He denied any involvement in Kennedy's death, saying:

It would have been absolute insanity by Cuba.... It would have been a provocation. Needless to say, it would have been to run the risk that our country would have been destroyed by the United States. Nobody who's not insane could have thought about [killing Kennedy in retaliation].^[276][314]

President Lyndon Johnson also implicated the CIA in the assassination. According to a FBI document released in 1977, Johnson's postmaster general, Marvin Watson told the FBI "...that [Johnson] was now convinced there was a plot in connection with the assassination. Watson stated the President felt the CIA had something to do with this plot."^{[315][316][317][318][319]}

Soviet conspiracy

The Warren Commission reported that they found no evidence that the Soviet Union was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.^[11] The House Select Committee on Assassinations also wrote: "The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy".^[243]
According to some conspiracy theorists, the Soviet Union, with Nikita Khrushchev motivated by having to back down during the Cuban Missile Crisis, was responsible for the assassination.^[275]
According to a 1966 FBI document, Colonel Boris Ivanov—chief of the KGB at the time of the assassination—stated that it was his personal opinion that the assassination had been planned by an organized group, rather than a lone individual. The same document stated, "...officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union believed there was some well-organized conspiracy on the part of the 'ultraright' in the United States to effect a 'coup.'"^[320]
Much later, the highest-ranking Soviet Bloc intelligence defector, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa said that he had a conversation with Nicolae Ceauşescu who told him about "ten international leaders the Kremlin killed or tried to kill": "László Rajk and Imre Nagy of Hungary; Lucreţiu Pătrăşcanu and Gheorghiu-Dej in Romania; Rudolf Slánský, the head of Czechoslovakia, and Jan Masaryk, that country's chief diplomat; the Shah of Iran; Palmiro Togliatti of Italy; American President John F. Kennedy; and Mao Zedong." Pacepa provided some additional details, such as a plot to kill Mao Zedong with the help of Lin Biao organized by KGB and claimed that "among the leaders of Moscow's satellite intelligence services there was unanimous agreement that the KGB had been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy."^[321] Pacepa later released a book, Programmed to Kill: Lee Harvey Oswald, the Soviet KGB, and the Kennedy Assassination, in 2007.

Decoy hearse and wound alteration

David Lifton presented a scenario in which conspirators on Air Force One removed Kennedy's body from its original bronze casket and placed it in a shipping casket, while en route from Dallas to Washington. Once the presidential plane arrived at Andrews Air Force Base, the shipping casket with the President's body in it was surreptitiously taken by helicopter from the side of the plane that was out of the television camera's view. Kennedy's body was then taken to an unknown location—most likely Walter Reed Army Medical Center^[322]—to surgically alter the body to make it appear that he was shot only from the rear.^{[323][324][325][326]}
Part of Lifton's theory comes from a House Select Committee on Assassinations report of an interview of Lt. Richard Lipsey on January 18, 1978 by committee staff members Donald Purdy and Mark Flanagan. According to the report, Lt. Richard Lipsey said that he and General Wehle had met President Kennedy's body at Andrews Air Force Base. Lipsey "...placed [the casket] in a hearse to be transported to Bethesda Naval Hospital. Lipsey mentioned that he and Wehle then flew by helicopter to Bethesda and took [the body of] JFK into the back of Bethesda." Lipsey said that "a decoy hearse had been driven to the front [of Bethesda]."^[327] With Lipsey's mention of a "decoy hearse" at Bethesda, Lifton theorized that the casket removed by Lipsey from Air Force One—from the side of the plane exposed to television—was probably also a decoy and was likely empty.^[328][329]
Laboratory technologist Paul O'Connor was one of the major witnesses supporting another part of David Lifton's theory that somewhere between Parkland and Bethesda the President's body was made to appear as if it had been shot only from the rear. O'Connor said that President Kennedy's body arrived at Bethesda inside a body bag in "a cheap, shipping-type of casket", which differed from the description of the ornamental bronze casket and sheet that the body had been wrapped in at Parkland Hospital.^[326] O'Connor said that the brain had already been removed by the time it got to Bethesda,^[326] and that there were "just little pieces" of brain matter left inside the skull.^[330]
Researcher David Wrone dismissed the theory that Kennedy's body was surreptitiously removed from the presidential plane, stating that as is done with all cargo on airplanes for safety precautions, the coffin and lid were held by steel wrapping cables to prevent shifting during takeoff and landing and in case of air disturbances in flight.^[325] According to Wrone, the side of the plane away from the television camera "was bathed in klieg lights, and thousands of persons watched along the fence that bent backward along that side, providing, in effect, a well-lit and very public stage for any would-be body snatchers".^[325]

Federal Reserve conspiracy

Jim Marrs, in his book Crossfire, presented the theory that Kennedy was trying to rein in the power of the Federal Reserve, and that forces opposed to such action might have played at least some part in the assassination.^{[331][332][333]} According to Marrs, the issuance of Executive Order 11110 was an effort by Kennedy to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the United States Department of the Treasury by replacing Federal Reserve Notes with Silver Certificates.^[332] Actor and author Richard Belzer named the responsible parties in this theory as American "billionaires, power brokers, and bankers ... working in tandem with the CIA and other sympathetic agents of the government."^[194]
A 2010 article in Research magazine discussing various controversies surrounding the Federal Reserve stated that "the wildest accusation against the Fed is that it was involved in Kennedy's assassination."^[332] Critics of the theory note that Kennedy called for and signed legislation phasing out Silver Certificates in favor of Federal Reserve Notes, thereby enhancing the power of the Federal Reserve; and that Executive Order 11110 was a technicality that only delegated existing presidential powers to the Secretary of the Treasury for administrative convenience during a period of transition.^[332][333]

Israeli conspiracy

Immediately following Kennedy's death, speculation that he was assassinated by a "Zionist conspiracy" was prevalent in much of the Arab world and the Middle East.^[334] Among these views were that Zionists were motivated to kill Kennedy due to his opposition to an Israeli nuclear program, that Lyndon B. Johnson received orders from Zionists to have Kennedy killed, and that the assassin was a Zionist agent.^[334]
According to Michael Collins Piper in Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Controversy, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion orchestrated the assassination after learning that Kennedy planned to keep Israel from obtaining nuclear weapons.^[335] Piper said that the assassination "was a joint enterprise conducted on the highest levels of the American CIA, in collaboration with organized crime—and most specifically, with direct and profound involvement by the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad."^[336] The theory also alleges involvement of Meyer Lansky and the Anti-Defamation League.^[335] In 2004, Mordechai Vanunu stated that the assassination was Israel's response to "pressure [Kennedy] exerted on... Ben-Gurion, to shed light on Dimona's nuclear reactor."^[337] In a speech before the United Nations General Assembly in 2009, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi also alleged that Kennedy was killed for wanting to investigate Dimona.^[338]

Other published theories

• Appointment in Dallas (1975) by Hugh McDonald suggests that Oswald was lured into a plot that he was told was a staged fake attempt to kill JFK to embarrass the Secret Service and to alert the government of the necessity for beefed-up Secret Service security. Oswald’s role was to shoot at the motorcade but deliberately miss the target. The plotters then killed JFK themselves and framed Oswald for the crime. McDonald claims that, after being told the "truth" about JFK's death by CIA agent Herman Kimsey in 1964, he spent years trying to locate a man known as “Saul.” Saul was supposedly the unidentified man who was photographed exiting the Russian embassy in Mexico City in September 1963, whose photos were subsequently sent to the FBI in Dallas on the morning of November 22, 1963 (before the assassination), and mislabelled "Lee Harvey Oswald". McDonald claims to have finally tracked Saul down in London in 1972 at which time Saul revealed the details of the plot to him.

• Reasonable Doubt (1985) by Henry Hurt, who writes about his Warren Commission doubts. Mr. Hurt pins the plot on professional crook Robert Easterling, along with Texas oilmen and the supposed Ferrie/Shaw alliance. ISBN 0-03-004059-0.

• Behold a Pale Horse (1991) by William Cooper alleges that Kennedy was shot by the Presidential limousine's driver, Secret Service agent William Greer. In the Zapruder film, Greer can be seen turning to his right and looking backwards just before speeding away from Dealey Plaza. This theory has come under severe criticism from others in the research community.^[339] ISBN 0-929385-22-5.

• Mark North's Act of Treason: The Role of J. Edgar Hoover in the assassination of President Kennedy, (1991) implicates the FBI Director. North documents that Hoover was aware of threats against Kennedy by organized crime before 1963, and suggests that he failed to take proper action to prevent the assassination. North also charges Hoover with failure to work adequately to uncover the truth behind Kennedy's murder. ISBN 0-88184-877-8.

• Mortal Error: The Shot That Killed JFK (1992) by Bonar Menninger (ISBN 0-312-08074-3) alleges that while Oswald did attempt to assassinate JFK and did succeed in wounding him, the fatal shot was accidentally fired by Secret Service agent George Hickey, who was riding in the Secret Service follow-up car directly behind the Presidential Limousine. The theory alleges that after the first two shots were fired the motorcade sped up while Hickey was attempting to respond to Oswald's shots and he lost his balance and accidentally pulled the trigger of his AR-15 and shot JFK. Hickey's testimony says otherwise: "At the end of the last report (shot) I reached to the bottom of the car and picked up the AR 15 rifle, cocked and loaded it, and turned to the rear." (italics added).^[340] George Hickey sued Menninger in April 1995 for what he had written in Mortal Error. The case was dismissed as its statute of limitations had run out.

• Who Shot JFK? : A Guide to the Major Conspiracy Theories (1993) by Bob Callahan and Mark Zingarelli explores some of the more obscure theories regarding JFK's murder, such as "The Coca-Cola Theory." According this theory, suggested by the editor of an organic gardening magazine, Oswald killed JFK due to mental impairment stemming from an addiction to refined sugar, as evidenced by his need for his favorite beverage immediately after the assassination. ISBN 0-671-79494-9.

• Passport to Assassination (1993) by Oleg M. Nechiporenko, the Soviet consular official (and highly placed KGB officer) who met with Oswald in Mexico City in 1963. He was afforded the unique opportunity to interview Oswald about his goals including his genuine desire for a Cuban visa. His conclusions were (1) that Oswald killed Kennedy due to extreme feelings of inadequacy versus his wife’s professed admiration for JFK, and (2) that the KGB never sought intelligence information from Oswald during his time in the USSR as they did not trust his motivations. ISBN 1-55972-210-X.

• Norman Mailer's Oswald's Tale: An American Mystery (1995) concludes that Oswald was guilty, but holds that the evidence may point to a second gunman on the grassy knoll, who, purely by coincidence, was attempting to kill JFK at the same time as Oswald. "If there was indeed another shot, it was not necessarily fired by a conspirator of Oswald's. Such a gun could have belonged to another lone killer or to a conspirator working for some other group altogether."^[341] ISBN 0-679-42535-7.

• The Kennedy Mutiny (2002) by Will Fritz (not the same as police captain J. Will Fritz), claims that the assassination plot was orchestrated by General Edwin Walker, and that he framed Oswald for the crime. ISBN 0-9721635-0-6.

• JFK: The Second Plot (2002) by Matthew Smith explores the strange case of Roscoe White. In 1990, Roscoe's son Ricky made public a claim that his father, who had been a Dallas police officer in 1963, was involved in killing the president. Roscoe's widow Geneva also claimed that before her husband's death in 1971 he left a diary in which he claims he was one of the marksmen who shot the President, and that he also killed Officer J. D. Tippit. ISBN 1-84018-501-5.

• David Wrone's The Zapruder Film (2003) concludes that the shot that killed JFK came from in front of the limousine, and that JFK's throat and back wounds were caused by an in-and-through shot originating from the grassy knoll. Three shots were fired from three different angles, none of them from Lee Harvey Oswald's window at the Texas School Book Depository. Wrone is a professor of history (emeritus) at the University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point. ISBN 0-7006-1291-2.

• The Gemstone File: A Memoir (2006), by Stephanie Caruana, posits that Oswald was part of a 28-man assassination team which included three U.S. Mafia hitmen (Jimmy Fratianno, John Roselli, and Eugene Brading). Oswald's role was to shoot John Connally. Bruce Roberts, author of the Gemstone File papers, claimed that the JFK assassination scenario was modeled after a supposed attempted assassination of President F.D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt was riding in an open car with Mayor Anton Cermak of Chicago. Cermak was shot and killed by Giuseppe Zangara. In Dallas, JFK was the real target, and Connally was a secondary target. The JFK assassination is only a small part of the Gemstone File's account. ISBN 1-4120-6137-7.

• Joseph P. Farrell's LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy (2011) attempts to show multiple interests had reasons to remove President Kennedy: The military, CIA, NASA, anti-Castro factions, Hoover's FBI and others. He concludes that the person that allowed all of these groups to form a "coalescence of interests" was Vice President Lyndon Johnson. ISBN 978-1-935487-18-0

• In "Allegations of PFC Eugene Dinkin",^[342] the Mary Farrell Foundation summarizes and archives documents related to Private First Class Eugene B. Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator stationed in Metz, France, who went AWOL in early November 1963, entered Switzerland using a false ID, and visited the United Nations' press office and declared that officials in the U.S. government were planning to assassinate President Kennedy, adding that "something" might happen to the Commander in Chief in Texas. Dinkin was arrested nine days before Kennedy was killed, placed in psychiatric care (deemed a mad man?), and released shortly thereafter. His allegations eventually made their way to the Warren Commission, but, according to the Ferrell Foundation account, the Commission "took no interest in the matter, and indeed omitted any mention of Dinkin from its purportedly encyclopedic 26 volumes of evidence."^[343]

See also

• JFK (film), a 1991 film that examines the events leading to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and alleged subsequent cover-up, through the eyes of former New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison.
• American Tabloid, a 1995 novel by James Ellroy, which portrays the five years leading up to the assassination from the point of view of a group of Mafia associates and CIA operatives, who become embroiled in the Bay of Pigs Invasion and eventually help plan the crime.
• An American Affair, a 2009 film that portrays the assassination and the relation between Kennedy and Mary Pinchot Meyer.
• The Cold Six Thousand, a 2001 novel by James Ellroy, the sequel to American Tabloid. The first third of the novel portrays a cover-up of the JFK assassination, while the remainder concerns the events leading up to the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy.
• Executive Action, a 1973 film by David Miller that portrays the assassination from the point of view of the conspirators, who are right-wing tycoons and former covert ops specialists.
• JFK: 3 Shots That Changed America, a 2009 documentary film complied from archived news .

Notes

1. ^ Addressing Lane's testimony alleging a meeting between Ruby, Tippit, and Weissman, the Commission reported that they "found no evidence that such a meeting took place anywhere at any time".^[181]
2. ^ According to the Warren Commission, after Earlene Roberts saw Oswald standing near the bus stop outside his rooming house, "[he] was next seen about nine-tenths of a mile (1.4 km) away at the southeast corner of 10th Street and Patton Avenue, moments before the Tippit shooting."^[213]