Obama Administration Seeks to Secure Iran Deal
Meeting of signatories to nuclear deal presents opportunity to shore up support for one of president’s key foreign-policy legacies; Trump has called agreement ‘horrible’
http://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-administration-seeks-to-secure-iran-deal-1484044699
 
        
  
        Iranian President 
Hassan Rouhani, right, greeting Mohsen Hashemi, left, son of former 
President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who died Sunday after suffering a 
heart attack, in a mourning ceremony at the Jamaran mosque in northern 
Tehran on Monday. 
        
          
            Photo: 
          
          Ebrahim Noroozi/Associated Press
        
      
BRUSSELS—U.S., European and Iranian officials meet Tuesday in 
Vienna, a last opportunity for the Obama administration to bolster the 
Iranian nuclear agreement along with its partners before President-elect
 Donald Trump takes office.
The officials are meeting under the 
aegis of the so-called Joint Commission, comprised of representatives of
 Iran and the six world powers who negotiated the July 2015 nuclear 
deal. The commission oversees the implementation of the accord and 
arbitrates disputes among the signatories.
In recent months, the 
Commission has approved decisions to exempt some Iranian nuclear 
material from the country’s stockpile limits and sought to shore up the 
agreement with measures to ensure Iran doesn’t breach the terms of the 
nuclear accord by exceeding caps on material such as uranium and heavy 
water.
During
 the U.S. presidential campaign, Mr. Trump repeatedly attacked the 
accord, a key foreign-policy legacy of the Obama administration. After 
the Nov. 8 election, U.S. officials said they were looking for ways to 
help secure the agreement.
Among the issues set for discussion 
Tuesday are Iranian complaints about the decision last month by U.S. 
Congress to extend nonnuclear U.S. sanctions on Tehran, according to 
diplomats.
The meeting may also address the decision by the six 
powers to allow Iran to import large amounts of natural uranium. On 
Monday, Western diplomats confirmed that the U.S. had backed a request 
by Russia to export more than 100 tons of natural uranium to Iran. A 
second export request by Kazakhstan is pending, they said.
Despite
 reservations in some European capitals, the decision to approve the 
Russian uranium export request was supported by the U.S. administration,
 according to several Western diplomats. It must still be confirmed by 
the United Nations Security Council.
In its natural form, uranium
 isn’t useful in a nuclear program, but it can be enriched to produce 
fuel for a nuclear weapon. White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that “any sort of uranium that’s held by the Iranian government will be subject to very strict limits.”
U.S.
 officials say Iran could use the uranium from Russia to fuel its 
nuclear power plant at Bushehr. Iran was required to submit plans for 
use of the material, which will be monitored, the officials say, for the
 next 25 years.
Under the nuclear deal, Iran is limited to a 
stockpile of low-enriched uranium of 300 kilograms, about 660 pounds, 
for the next 15 years—a key part of the deal designed to ensure that 
until at least 2026, it will take Iran over a year to accumulate enough 
material for a nuclear weapon.
Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear program is for purely civilian purposes.
Iran
 received shipments of natural uranium before the agreement was fully 
implemented in January 2016. Those transfers, mandated by the 2015 
accord, came after Iran to ship enriched uranium out of the country. 
Additional imports of natural uranium were neither ruled out nor clearly
 permitted, requiring Iran to make a specific request to the Joint 
Commission’s procurement group.
While natural uranium can’t be 
used directly in a nuclear program, the material would give Iran, if it 
decided to repudiate the nuclear agreement, an additional supply of 
ready-to-use material that it could quickly enrich into nuclear fuel. 
Iran still has the technology, including thousands of centrifuges, to 
purify the uranium into more dangerous forms.
France and Britain,
 two signatories of the accord, raised concerns about the uranium 
exports during weekslong discussions over the Russian export request, 
according to three diplomats.
Officials pressed for more details 
on the destination of the material and where it would be stored. 
Additional explanations, they said, were needed partly because Iran has 
its own uranium mines.
“We also wanted to know why they needed it,” one of the diplomats said.
While
 French officials took a hawkish line both during the nuclear talks and 
the deal’s implementation, several people involved in the discussions 
said it was the U.K. that had become increasingly skeptical in recent 
months.
However, neither Britain nor France, which are both 
represented on the group that makes recommendations on Iran’s 
procurement requests, blocked Russia’s export request. Moscow’s support 
will also be needed to approve the Kazakh uranium delivery.
Mr. 
Trump hasn’t made clear since his election victory how he specifically 
plans to approach the Iranian nuclear deal. While he frequently 
denounced the agreement during the presidential campaign, his only 
public mention of it since the November vote was in a tweet on Israel in
 which he labeled it “horrible.”
—Carol E. Lee contributed to this article. 
November 30, 2016
The Obama legacy
Nothing sums up the Obama legacy better than this quote from Edward Luce of the Financial Times:
It will be as if Mr Obama was never here.
Can there be a more concise judgment?
History
 will remember Barack Obama as the first black president.  Beyond that, 
what else?  His attempt to transform the nation worsened economic and 
social conditions.  He transformed his own party to the point where it 
may not survive.
Mr. Luce explained what will occur domestically:
The Obama erasure will go far deeper than undoing domestic laws, or foreign deals. Mr Trump will repeal Obamacare, or alter it beyond recognition. He will “keep an open mind” about whether to pull the US out of the Paris agreement on climate change and quite probably blow up the US-Iran nuclear deal.
The
 American people demanded the destruction of Obamaism.  In order to 
survive, the Democratic Party will disown their Pied Piper, eventually 
abhorring his policies more than conservatives.
Despite his overall judgment, Mr. Luce's assessment of Barack Obama is more positive and gracious than mine:
Here was a highly intelligent leader, and a fundamentally decent one, who strived to make the case for international co-operation to a world that was not really listening.
… But the world’s attention has wandered. People are highly fearful — and rightly so.
Such an assessment is flattering and fawning in these respects:
- The "highly intelligent leader" might be described as painfully ignorant of how the world works or a committed ideologue to a system that always fails. Given Obama's educational opportunities, stupidity rather than ignorance seems appropriate.
- The "fundamentally decent one" routinely lied to the American people in order to pass harmful policies. He illegally utilized the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service for political purposes and engaged in cover-ups (gun-running to Mexico, Benghazi, etc.) to protect himself.
- Obama's approach to governance was dictatorial. He went around Congress with executive orders, many of which were overturned by the courts. He famously terminated at least one discussion with: "I won, you lost."
If Obama is to be more than a William Henry Harrison footnote in history, it will be as a result of future events.
Foreign Policy
Mr Luce states:
The global role that Mr Obama inherited – and tried, to some degree, to uphold – is now in tatters.
If
 legacies can be achieved via future disasters, Mr. Obama still has a 
chance.  His feckless "lead from behind" foreign policy leaves the world
 vulnerable to conflict.  Like his domestic policies, most international
 agreements were made without congressional approval.
If the world unravels, Mr. Obama has the potential to become history's next Sir Edward Grey.  
Post-Presidency
Obama
 is young for an ex-president.  What he does with this time will 
influence history's assessment.  That may not be a positive. 
Obama's narcissism
 and need for attention will make it difficult to leave the stage.  As a
 media favorite, he will always have a platform.  As an ex-president, 
even a failed one, he may make positive contributions.  These should be 
welcomed.
If
 Obama's need for the stage outweighs his positive contributions, he 
will become a public nuisance.  Past behavior suggests that this should 
be expected.  Obama is likely to try to become the Community Organizer 
of The World.  History is unlikely to look kindly on such an effort.
Monty Pelerin blogs on politics, economics and investing at www.economicnoise.com.
 
        
  
KAMI SEKELUARGA TAK LUPA MENGUCAPKAN PUJI SYUKUR KEPADA ALLAH S,W,T
BalasHapusdan terima kasih banyak kepada AKI atas nomor yang AKI
beri 4 angka [1869] alhamdulillah ternyata itu benar2 tembus .
dan alhamdulillah sekarang saya bisa melunasi semua utan2 saya yang
ada sama tetangga.dan juga BANK BRI dan bukan hanya itu KI. insya
allah saya akan coba untuk membuka usaha sendiri demi mencukupi
kebutuhan keluarga saya sehari-hari itu semua berkat bantuan AKI..
sekali lagi makasih banyak ya AKI… bagi saudara yang suka PASANG NOMOR
yang ingin merubah nasib seperti saya silahkan hubungi KI JAYA,,di no (((085-321-606-847)))
insya allah anda bisa seperti saya…menang NOMOR 750 JUTA , wassalam.